Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2016-06-13 · Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce · Notices

Notices. Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce

415 words·~2 min read·/register/2016/06/13/2016-13953·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 3510-FP-P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-036] Certain Biaxial Integral Geogrid Products from the People's Republic of China: Postponement of Preliminary Determination of Antidumping Duty Investigation AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. DATES: June 13, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julia Hancock or Susan Pulongbarit, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202)482-1394, or
(202)482-4031, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Postponement of Preliminary Determination On February 16, 2016, the Department of Commerce (“Department”) published a notice initiating an antidumping duty investigation of certain biaxial integral geogrid products from the People's Republic of China (“PRC”). 1 Section 733(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (“the Act”), and 19 CFR 351.205(b)(1) state that the Department will make a preliminary determination no later than 140 days after the date of the initiation ( *i.e.,* February 8, 2016). Accordingly, the preliminary determination of this antidumping duty investigation is currently due no later than June 27, 2016. 1 *See Certain Biaxial Integral Geogrid Products from the People's Republic of China: Initiation of Antidumping Duty Investigation,* 81 FR 7755 (February 16, 2016). On May 27, 2016, Tensar Corporation (“Petitioner”), made a timely request, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.205(e), for postponement of the preliminary determination, in order to facilitate the Department's analysis of respondents' questionnaire responses and interested parties' surrogate value data submissions. Because there are no compelling reasons to deny the request, in accordance with section 733(c)(1)(A) of the Act, the Department is postponing the deadline for the preliminary determination by 50 days. 2 2 *See* Letter to the Secretary of Commerce from Petitioner “Request to Postpone Preliminary Determination” (May 27, 2016). For the reasons stated above, the Department, in accordance with section 733(c)(1)(A) of the Act, is postponing the deadline for the preliminary determination to no later than 190 days after the date on which the Department initiated this investigation. Therefore, the new deadline for the preliminary determination is August 16, 2016. In accordance with section 735(a)(1) of the Act, the deadline for the final determination of this investigation will continue to be 75 days after the date of the preliminary determination, unless postponed at a later date. This notice is issued and published pursuant to section 733(c)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1). Dated: June 7, 2016. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2016-13953 Filed 6-10-16; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 1
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.