Unknown. Petition for rulemaking; denial
6,569 words·~30 min read·
/register/2016/05/13/2016-11212·A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
--- schema: federal-register doc_type: fedreg source_file: FR-2016-05-13.xml --- 81 93 Friday, May 13, 2016 Contents Agricultural Marketing Agricultural Marketing Service NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals, 29833-29834 2016-11318 Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Generic Fruit Crops, 29832-29833 2016-11319 Agriculture Agriculture Department See Agricultural Marketing Service See Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Alcohol Tobacco Tax Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities;
Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals, 29950-29953 2016-11334 Animal Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service NOTICES Evaluation of the Classical Swine Fever, Swine Vesicular Disease, African Swine Fever, Foot-and-Mouth Disease, and Rinderpest Status of Malta, 29834-29836 2016-11316 Requests for Nominations: General Conference Committee of the National Poultry Improvement Plan; Corrections, 29834 2016-11314 Army Army Department NOTICES Environmental Impact Statements; Availability, etc.:
Training Mission and Mission Support Activities at Fort Campbell, KY, 29849-29850 2016-11285 Centers Medicare Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services NOTICES Meetings: Medicare Program; New and Reconsidered Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Test Codes for the Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule for Calendar Year 2017, 29863-29865 2016-11269 Children Children and Families Administration NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals, 29865-29866 2016-11325 Civil Rights Civil Rights Commission NOTICES Meetings;
Sunshine Act, 29836 2016-11451 Coast Guard Coast Guard RULES Drawbridge Operations: Grassy Sound Channel, Middle Township, NJ, 29770 2016-11349 Safety Zones: National Grid—Beck Lockport 104 and Beck Harper 106 Removal Project; Niagara River, Lewiston, NY, 29774-29776 2016-11363 Navy UNDET, Apra Outer Harbor and Piti, GU, 29772-29774 2016-11361 Security Zones: Tall-Ship CUAUHTEMOC; Thames River, New London Harbor, New London, CT, 29770-29772 2016-11253 Special Local Regulations:
Lake of the Ozarks, Lakeside, MO, 29768-29770 2016-11339 PROPOSED RULES Safety Zones: Allegheny River Mile 12.0 to 12.5, Oakmont, PA, 29819-29821 2016-11365 Commerce Commerce Department See First Responder Network Authority See Foreign-Trade Zones Board See International Trade Administration See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration See National Telecommunications and Information Administration NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals, 29836-29837 2016-11241 Committee for Purchase Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled NOTICES Procurement List;
Additions and Deletions, 29848-29849 2016-11330 2016-11331 Commodity Futures Commodity Futures Trading Commission NOTICES Meetings; Sunshine Act, 29849 2016-11548 Defense Acquisition Defense Acquisition Regulations System NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Quality Assurance, 29850-29851 2016-11373 Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Radio Frequency Identification Advance Shipment Notices, 29851 2016-11374 Defense Department Defense Department See Army Department See Defense Acquisition Regulations System NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities;
Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals, 29851-29852 2016-11290 Charter Renewals: Department of Defense Federal Advisory Committees, 29852-29853 2016-11308 Meetings: Defense Health Board, 29853-29854 2016-11342 Education Department Education Department NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals, 29854 2016-11303 Employment and Training Employment and Training Administration NOTICES Meetings: Advisory Committee on Apprenticeship, 29921-29922 2016-11315 Environmental Protection Environmental Protection Agency RULES Acquisition Regulations:
Small Business Programs, Solicitation Provisions and Contract Clauses, 29793-29798 2016-11378 PROPOSED RULES National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Site Remediation, 29821-29828 2016-10988 NOTICES Access to Confidential Business Information: Abt Associates, Inc., 29855 2016-11379 Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals Title I of the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act, 29856 2016-11275 Agency Information Collection Activities;
Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Brownfields Program—Accomplishment Reporting, 29857 2016-11277 Solid Waste Disposal Facility Criteria, 29858 2016-11276 Environmental Impact Statements; Availability, etc.; Weekly Receipts, 29855-29856 2016-11347 Executive Office Executive Office for Immigration Review NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Application for Cancellation of Removal
(42A)for Certain Permanent Residents; and Application for Cancellation of Removal and Adjustment of Status
(42B)for Certain Nonpermanent Residents, 29919-29920 2016-11321 Export Import Export-Import Bank NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals, 29858-29859 2016-11340 Federal Aviation Federal Aviation Administration PROPOSED RULES Airworthiness Directives: Fokker Services B.V. Airplanes, 29800-29802 2016-11172 Saab AB, Saab Aeronautics (Type Certificate Previously Held by Saab AB, Saab Aerosystems) Airplanes, 29807-29809 2016-11171 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Helicopters, 29817-29819 2016-11196 The Boeing Company Airplanes, 29802-29807, 29809-29817 2016-11169 2016-11170 2016-11173 Federal Communications Federal Communications Commission PROPOSED RULES Emergency Alert System and Wireless Emergency Alerts, 29828-29829 2016-11232 Increase Resilience and Enhance Information Sharing During Disasters, 29829-29830 2016-11233 NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals, 29859 2016-11335 Federal Deposit Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation NOTICES Terminations of Receivership: 10261, Turnberry Bank, Aventura, FL, 29860 2016-11324 Miami Valley Bank Lakeview, OH, 29859-29860 2016-11355 The Peoples Bank, Winder, GA, 29860 2016-11356 Updates to Notice of Financial Institutions for Which the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has been Appointed Either Receiver, Liquidator, or Manager, 29860 2016-11357 Federal Election Federal Election Commission NOTICES Policy Statements: Program for Requesting Consideration of Legal Questions by the Commission, 29861-29862 2016-11145 Federal Mine Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission NOTICES Meetings; Sunshine Act, 29862-29863 2016-11453 2016-11454 Federal Reserve Federal Reserve System NOTICES Changes in Bank Control: Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank or Bank Holding Company, 29863 2016-11242 FIRSTNET First Responder Network Authority NOTICES Environmental Impact Statements; Availability, etc.: East Region of the Nationwide Public Safety Broadband Network and Notice of Public Meetings; Correction, 29837-29838 2016-11370 Fish Fish and Wildlife Service NOTICES Endangered Species; Marine Mammals: Receipt of Applications for Permit, 29889-29890 2016-11307 Environmental Impact Statements; Availability, etc.: Final Pima County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan, Pima County, AZ, 29907-29909 2016-10948 Incidental Take Permit Applications: Participation in the Amended Oil and Gas Industry Conservation Plan for the American Burying Beetle in Oklahoma, 29909-29910 2016-11333 Marine Mammals; Incidental Take During Specified Activities: Proposed Incidental Harassment Authorization for Northern Sea Otters from the Southcentral Stock in Cook Inlet, AK, 29890-29907 2016-11426 Food and Drug Food and Drug Administration NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Food Labeling; Notification Procedures for Statements on Dietary Supplements, 29867-29868 2016-11272 Charter Renewals: Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee, 29868-29869 2016-11323 Draft Guidance for Industry and Staff: Infectious Disease Next Generation Sequencing Based Diagnostic Devices: Microbial Identification and Detection of Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Markers, 29869-29870 2016-11237 Guidance: Frequently Asked Questions about Medical Foods; Second Edition, 29866-29867 2016-11268 Foreign Trade Foreign-Trade Zones Board NOTICES Applications for Reorganization under Alternative Site Framework: Foreign-Trade Zone 20—Norfolk, VA, 29838 2016-11391 Health and Human Health and Human Services Department See Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services See Children and Families Administration See Food and Drug Administration See Health Resources and Services Administration See National Institutes of Health See Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration NOTICES Findings of Research Misconduct, 29871 2016-11317 Health Resources Health Resources and Services Administration NOTICES Health Center Program, 29870-29871 2016-11413 Homeland Homeland Security Department See Coast Guard See U.S. Customs and Border Protection PROPOSED RULES Updates to Protected Critical Infrastructure Information Program, 29799-29800 2016-11338 NOTICES Meetings: Homeland Security Advisory Council, 29881-29882 2016-11345 Housing Housing and Urban Development Department NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Continuum of Care Homeless Assistance—Technical Submission, 29882-29883 2016-11354 Consolidated Redelegation of Authority for the Government National Mortgage Association (Ginnie Mae), 29883-29885 2016-11358 Federal Property Suitable as Facilities to Assist the Homeless, 29885-29888 2016-11046 Order of Succession for Government National Mortgage Association (Ginnie Mae), 29888-29889 2016-11359 Indian Affairs Indian Affairs Bureau NOTICES Indian Land Consolidation Lien Removal and Acquisition Fund Disposition, 29910 2016-11286 Proposed Finding Against Acknowledgment of the Georgia Tribe of Eastern Cherokee, Inc., 29910-29912 2016-11301 Interior Interior Department See Fish and Wildlife Service See Indian Affairs Bureau See Land Management Bureau See National Park Service RULES Land Exchange Procedures and Procedures to Amend the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 29776-29793 2016-11146 Internal Revenue Internal Revenue Service NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals, 29953-29958 2016-11327 2016-11328 2016-11332 2016-11362 2016-11364 2016-11366 2016-11369 Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Dividend Equivalents from Sources within the United States, 29954 2016-11367 International Trade Adm International Trade Administration NOTICES Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Investigations, Orders, or Reviews: Certain Steel Threaded Rod from the People's Republic of China, 29843-29846 2016-11389 Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea, 29840-29842 2016-11390 Solid Fertilizer Grade Ammonium Nitrate from the Russian Federation, 29839-29840 2016-11388 Meetings: President's Export Council, 29842-29843 2016-11485 International Trade Com International Trade Commission NOTICES Meetings; Sunshine Act, 29919 2016-11447 Justice Department Justice Department See Executive Office for Immigration Review NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Electronic Applications for the Attorney General's Honors Program and the Summer Law Intern Program, 29920-29921 2016-11322 Request for Registration under the Gambling Devices Act of 1962, 29920 2016-11320 Labor Department Labor Department See Employment and Training Administration Land Land Management Bureau NOTICES Environmental Impact Statements; Availability, etc.: Energy Gateway South Transmission Project and Proposed Land-use Plan Amendments, 29912-29915 2016-11371 Proposed Coeur Rochester Mine Plan of Operations Amendment 10 and Closure Plan, Pershing County, NV, 29915-29916 2016-11287 Legal Legal Services Corporation NOTICES Meetings; Sunshine Act, 29922 2016-11477 National Credit National Credit Union Administration NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals, 29922-29923 2016-11343 National Highway National Highway Traffic Safety Administration NOTICES Petitions for Decisions of Inconsequential Noncompliance; Denials: Van Hool N.V., 29941-29942 2016-11271 National Institute National Institutes of Health NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: NIDDK Office of Minority Health Research Coordination Research Training and Mentor Programs Applications, 29877-29878 2016-11416 Study to Estimate Radiation Doses and Cancer Risks from Radioactive Fallout from the Trinity Nuclear Test—National Cancer Institute, 29875-29876 2016-11254 Meetings: Center for Scientific Review, 29876 2016-11255 National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, 29878 2016-11256 National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, 29874 2016-11259 National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 29872-29874 2016-11261 2016-11260 National Institute of General Medical Sciences, 29873 2016-11262 National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, 29876-29877 2016-11263 National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 29872 2016-11257 Requests for Information: Developing the National Cancer Moonshot Initiative, 29871-29872 2016-11283 National Oceanic National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOTICES Applications: Marine Mammals; File No. 19638, 29846-29847 2016-11311 Marine Mammals; File No. 19116, 29847-29848 2016-11309 Permits: Marine Mammals; File No. 20324, 29846 2016-11348 National Park National Park Service NOTICES Committee Renewals: Gateway National Recreation Area Fort Hancock 21st Century Advisory Committee, 29918 2016-11383 Meetings: Wekiva River System Advisory Management Committee; Cancellation, 29916 2016-11377 Requests for Nominations: Cape Cod National Seashore Advisory Commission, 29917-29918 2016-11372 Cedar Creek and Belle Grove National Historical Park Advisory Commission, 29918-29919 2016-11368 Paterson Great Falls National Historical Park Advisory Commission, 29917 2016-11375 National Telecommunications National Telecommunications and Information Administration NOTICES Environmental Impact Statements; Availability, etc.: East Region of the Nationwide Public Safety Broadband Network and Notice of Public Meetings; Correction, 29837-29838 2016-11370 Nuclear Regulatory Nuclear Regulatory Commission RULES Fuel-Cladding Issues in Postulated Spent Fuel Pool Accidents, 29761-29765 2016-11212 NOTICES Environmental Impact Statements; Availability, etc.: Geologic Repository for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste, Yucca Mountain, NV, 29923-29924 2016-11075 Pension Benefit Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation RULES Adjustment of Civil Penalties, 29765-29767 2016-11296 Benefits Payable in Terminated Single-Employer Plans; Interest Assumptions for Paying Benefits, 29767-29768 2016-11297 Personnel Personnel Management Office NOTICES Meetings: Hispanic Council on Federal Employment, 29924 2016-11288 Pipeline Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration PROPOSED RULES Pipeline Safety: Safety of Gas Transmission and Gathering Pipelines, 29830-29831 2016-11240 NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals, 29943-29950 2016-11304 Presidential Documents Presidential Documents ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS Yemen; Continuation of National Emergency (Notice of May 12, 2016), 30153-30155 2016-11587 Securities Securities and Exchange Commission RULES Business Conduct Standards for Security-Based Swap Dealers and Major Security-Based Swap Participants, 29960-30151 2016-10918 NOTICES Meetings; Sunshine Act, 29925 2016-11533 Public Company Accounting Oversight Board; Order Granting Approval of Proposed Rules to Require Disclosure of Certain Audit Participants, etc., 29925-29928 2016-11292 Self-Regulatory Organizations; Proposed Rule Changes: Bats BZX Exchange, Inc., 29932-29936 2016-11293 Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc., 29936-29939 2016-11294 Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc., 29929-29932 2016-11295 Trading Suspension Orders: GroveWare Technologies Ltd., Luve Sports, Inc., and Northcore Technologies, Inc., 29928-29929 2016-11459 Li-ion Motors Corp. (a/k/a Terra Inventions Corp.), PetroHunter Energy Corp., and Shrink Nanotechnologies, Inc., 29924-29925 2016-11460 Small Business Small Business Administration NOTICES Disaster Declarations: Arkansas, 29939-29940 2016-11386 Louisiana, 29939 2016-11384 Louisiana; Amendment 7, 29940 2016-11387 State Department State Department NOTICES Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition: Real/Ideal: Photography in France, 1847-1860, 29941 2016-11353 Unruly Nature: The Landscapes of Theodore Rousseau, 29940-29941 2016-11360 Meetings: Binational Bridges and Border Crossings Group in Mexico City, Mexico, 29940 2016-11351 Substance Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration NOTICES Meetings: Center for Mental Health Services, 29878 2016-11247 2016-11248 Transportation Department Transportation Department See Federal Aviation Administration See National Highway Traffic Safety Administration See Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Treasury Treasury Department See Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau See Internal Revenue Service Customs U.S. Customs and Border Protection NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Application to Establish a Centralized Examination Station, 29880-29881 2016-11278 Quarterly IRS Interest Rates Used in Calculating Interest on Overdue Accounts and Refunds on Customs Duties, 29879-29880 2016-11376 Separate Parts In This Issue Part II Securities and Exchange Commission, 29960-30151 2016-10918 Part III Presidential Documents, 30153-30155 2016-11587 Reader Aids Consult the Reader Aids section at the end of this issue for phone numbers, online resources, finding aids, and notice of recently enacted public laws. To subscribe to the Federal Register Table of Contents LISTSERV electronic mailing list, go to http://listserv.access.gpo.gov and select Online mailing list archives, FEDREGTOC-L, Join or leave the list (or change settings); then follow the instructions. 81 93 Friday, May 13, 2016 Rules and Regulations NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 10 CFR Part 50 [Docket Nos. PRM-50-108; NRC-2014-0171] Fuel-Cladding Issues in Postulated Spent Fuel Pool Accidents AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Petition for rulemaking; denial. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC)is denying a petition for rulemaking (PRM or the petition), PRM-50-108, submitted by Mr. Mark Edward Leyse (the petitioner). The petitioner requested that the NRC require power reactor licensees to perform evaluations to determine the potential consequences of various postulated spent fuel pool
(SFP)accident scenarios. The evaluations would be required to be submitted to the NRC for informational purposes. The NRC is denying the petition because the NRC does not believe the information is needed for effective NRC regulatory decisionmaking with respect to SFPs or for public safety, environmental protection, or common defense and security. DATES: The docket for the petition, PRM-50-108, is closed on May 13, 2016. ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2014-0171 when contacting the NRC about the availability of information for this petition. You may obtain publicly-available information related to this petition by any of the following methods: • *Federal Rulemaking Web site:* Go to *http://www.regulations.gov* and search for Docket ID NRC-2014-0171. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415-3463; email: *Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov.* For technical questions, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. • *The NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS):* You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the ADAMS Public Document collection at *http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.* To begin the search, select “ADAMS Public Documents” and then select “ *Begin Web-Based ADAMS Search.”* For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public Document Room
(PDR)reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to *pdr.resource@nrc.gov.* The ADAMS accession number for each document referenced (if it is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time that it is mentioned in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section. For the convenience of the reader, instructions about obtaining materials referenced in this document are provided in Section IV, “Availability of Documents,” of this document. • *The NRC's PDR:* You may examine and purchase copies of public documents at the NRC's PDR, O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel Doyle, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation; U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-3748; email: *Daniel.Doyle@nrc.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Table of Contents I. The Petition II. Reasons for Denial III. Conclusion IV. Availability of Documents I. The Petition Section 2.802 of title 10 of the *Code of Federal Regulations* (10 CFR), “Petition for rulemaking—requirements for filing,” provides an opportunity for any interested person to petition the Commission to issue, amend, or rescind any regulation. The NRC received a petition dated June 19, 2014, from Mr. Mark Edward Leyse and assigned it Docket No. PRM-50-108 (ADAMS Accession No. ML14195A388). The NRC published a notice of docketing in the **Federal Register**
(FR)on October 7, 2014 (79 FR 60383). The NRC did not request public comment on the petition because sufficient information was available for the NRC staff to form a technical opinion regarding the merits of the petition. The petitioner requested that the NRC develop new regulations requiring that:
(1)SFP accident evaluation models use data from multi-rod bundle (assembly) severe accident experiments for calculating the rates of energy release, hydrogen generation, and fuel cladding oxidation from the zirconium-steam reaction;
(2)SFP accident evaluation models use data from multi-rod bundle (assembly) severe accident experiments conducted with pre-oxidized fuel cladding for calculating the rates of energy release (from both fuel cladding oxidation and fuel cladding nitriding), fuel cladding oxidation, and fuel cladding nitriding from the zirconium-air reaction;
(3)SFP accident evaluation models be required to conservatively model nitrogen-induced breakaway oxidation behavior; and
(4)licensees be required to use conservative SFP accident evaluation models to perform annual SFP safety evaluations of: postulated complete loss-of-coolant accident
(LOCA)scenarios, postulated partial LOCA scenarios, and postulated boil-off accident scenarios. The petitioner referenced recent NRC post-Fukushima MELCOR simulations of boiling-water reactor Mark I SFP accident/fire scenarios. The petitioner stated that the conclusions from the NRC's MELCOR simulations are non-conservative and misleading because their conclusions underestimate the probabilities of large radiological releases from SFP accidents. The petitioner asserted that in actual SFP fires, there would be quicker fuel-cladding temperature escalations, releasing more heat, and quicker axial and radial propagation of zirconium
(Zr)fires than MELCOR simulations predict. The petitioner stated that the NRC's philosophy of defense-in-depth requires the application of conservative models, and, therefore, it is necessary to improve the performance of MELCOR and any other computer safety models that are intended to accurately simulate SFP accident/fire scenarios. The petitioner stated that the new regulations would help improve public and plant-worker safety. The petitioner asserted that the first three requested regulations, regarding zirconium fuel cladding oxidation and nitriding, as well as nitrogen-induced breakaway oxidation behavior, are intended to improve the performance of computer safety models that simulate postulated SFP accident/fire scenarios. The petitioner stated that the fourth requested regulation would require that licensees use conservative SFP accident evaluation models to perform annual SFP safety evaluations of postulated complete LOCA scenarios, postulated partial LOCA scenarios, and postulated boil-off accident scenarios. The petitioner stated that the purpose of these evaluations would be to keep the NRC informed of the potential consequences of postulated SFP accident/fire scenarios as fuel assembles were added, removed, or reconfigured in licensees' SFPs. The petitioner stated that the requested regulations are needed because the probability of the type of events that could lead to SFP accidents is relatively high. The NRC staff reviewed the petition and, based on its understanding of the overall argument in the petition, identified and evaluated the following three issues: • Issue 1: The requested regulations pertaining to SFP accident evaluation models are needed because the probability of the type of events that could lead to SFP accidents is relatively high. • Issue 2: Annual licensee SFP safety evaluations and submission of results to the NRC is necessary so that the NRC is aware of potential consequences of postulated SFP accident/fire scenarios as fuel assemblies are added, removed, or reconfigured in licensees' SFPs. • Issue 3: MELCOR is not currently sufficient to provide a conservative evaluation of postulated SFP accident/fire scenarios for use in the PRM-proposed annual SFP evaluations. Detailed NRC responses to the three issues are provided in Section II, “Reasons for Denial,” of this document. II. Reasons for Denial The NRC is denying the petition because the petitioner failed to present any significant information or arguments that would warrant the requested regulations. The first three requested regulations would establish requirements for how the detailed annual evaluations that would be required by the fourth requested regulation would be performed. It is not necessary to require detailed annual evaluations of the progression of SFP severe accidents because the risk of an SFP severe accident is low. The NRC defines risk as the product of the probability and the consequences of an accident. The requested annual evaluations are not needed for regulatory decisionmaking, and the evaluations would not prevent or mitigate an SFP accident. The petitioner described multiple ways that an extended loss of offsite electrical power could occur and how this could lead to an SFP fire. In order for an SFP fire to occur, all SFP systems, backup systems, and operator actions that are intended to prevent the spent fuel in the pool from being uncovered would have to fail. The NRC does not agree that more detailed accident evaluation models need to be developed for this purpose, as requested by the petitioner, because the requested annual evaluations are not needed for regulatory decisionmaking. The NRC recognizes that the consequences of an SFP fire could be large and that is why there are numerous requirements in place to prevent a situation where the spent fuel is uncovered. This section provides detailed NRC responses to the three issues identified in the petition. Issue 1: The Requested Regulations Pertaining to SFP Accident Evaluation Models Are Needed Because the Probability of the Type of Events That Could Lead to SFP Accidents Is Relatively High The petitioner stated that the requested regulations pertaining to SFP accident evaluation models are needed because the probability of the type of events that could lead to SFP accidents is relatively high. The petitioner stated that an SFP accident could happen as a result of a leak (rapid drain down) or boil-off scenario. Furthermore, the petitioner notes that in the event of a long-term station blackout, emergency diesel generators could run out of fuel and SFP cooling would be lost, resulting in a boil-off of SFP water inventory and a subsequent release of radioactive materials from the spent fuel. The petitioner also provided several examples of events that could lead to a long-term station blackout and, ultimately, an SFP accident, such as a strong geomagnetic disturbance, a nuclear device detonated in the earth's atmosphere, a pandemic, or a cyber or physical attack. NRC Response Spent nuclear fuel offloaded from a reactor is initially stored in an SFP. The SFPs at all nuclear plants in the United States are robust structures constructed with thick, reinforced, concrete walls and welded stainless-steel liners. They are designed to safely contain the spent fuel discharged from a nuclear reactor under a variety of normal, off-normal, and hypothetical accident conditions ( *e.g.,* loss of electrical power, loss of cooling, fuel or cask drop incidents, floods, earthquakes, or extreme weather events). Racks fitted in the SFPs store the fuel assemblies in a controlled configuration so that the fuel is maintained in a sub-critical and coolable geometry. Redundant monitoring, cooling, and water makeup systems are provided. The spent fuel assemblies are typically covered by at least 25-feet of water, which provides passive cooling as well as radiation shielding. Penetrations to pools are limited to prevent inadvertent drainage, and the penetrations are generally located well above spent fuel storage elevations to prevent uncovering of fuel from drainage. Studies conducted over the last four decades have consistently shown the risk of an accident causing a zirconium fire in an SFP to be low. The risk of an SFP accident was examined in the 1980s as Generic Issue 82, “Beyond Design Basis Accidents in Spent Fuel Pools,” in light of increased use of high-density storage racks and laboratory studies that indicated the possibility of zirconium fire propagation between assemblies in an air-cooled environment (Section 3 of NUREG-0933, “Resolution of Generic Safety Issues,” *http://nureg.nrc.gov/sr0933/* ). The risk assessment and cost-benefit analyses developed through this effort, Section 6.2 of NUREG-1353, “Regulatory Analysis for the Resolution of Generic Issue 82, Beyond Design Basis Accidents in Spent Fuel Pools” (ADAMS Accession No. ML082330232), concluded that the risk of a severe accident in the SFP was low and appeared to meet the objectives of the Commission's Safety Goal Policy Statement public health objectives (51 FR 30028; August 21, 1986) and that no new regulatory requirements were warranted. The risk of an SFP accident was re-assessed in the late 1990s to support a risk-informed rulemaking for permanently shutdown, or decommissioned, nuclear power plants in the United States. The study, NUREG-1738, “Technical Study of Spent Fuel Pool Accident Risk at Decommissioning Nuclear Power Plants” (ADAMS Accession No. ML010430066), conservatively assumed that if the water level in the SFP dropped below the top of the spent fuel, an SFP zirconium fire involving all of the spent fuel would occur, and thereby bounded those conditions associated with air cooling of the fuel (including partial-drain down scenarios) and fire propagation. Even with this conservative assumption, the study found the risk of an SFP fire to be low and well within the Commission's Safety Goals. Additional mechanisms to mitigate the potential loss of SFP water inventory were implemented following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, which have enhanced spent fuel coolability and the potential to recover SFP water level and cooling prior to a potential SFP zirconium fire (73 FR 76204; August 8, 2008). Based on the implementation of these additional strategies, the probability and, accordingly, the risk of an SFP zirconium fire initiation has decreased and is expected to be less than previously analyzed in NUREG-1738 and previous studies. Following the 2011 accident at Fukushima Dai-ichi, the NRC took extensive actions to ensure that portable equipment is available to mitigate a loss of cooling water in the SFP. On March 12, 2012, the NRC issued Order EA-12-049, “Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events” (ADAMS Accession No. ML12054A735). This order required licensees to develop, implement, and maintain guidance and strategies to maintain or restore core cooling, containment, and SFP cooling capabilities following a beyond-design-basis external event. The NRC endorsed the Nuclear Energy Institute
(NEI)guidance to meet the requirements of this order. 1 That guidance establishes additional mechanisms for mitigating a loss of SFP cooling water beyond the requirements in 10 CFR 50.54(hh)(2), such as installing a remote connection for SFP makeup water that can be accessed away from the SFP refueling floor. 1 See NEI 12-06, “Diverse and Flexible Coping Strategies
(FLEX)Implementation Guide,” dated August 2012 (ADAMS Accession No. ML12242A378), and JLD-ISG-2012-01, “Compliance with Order EA-12-049, Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events,” dated August 2012 (ADAMS Accession No. ML12229A174). Also, in 2014, the NRC documented a regulatory analysis in COMSECY-13-0030, “Staff Evaluation and Recommendation for Japan Lessons Learned Tier 3 Issue on Expedited Transfer of Spent Fuel” (ADAMS Accession No. ML13329A918), which considered a broad history of the NRC's oversight of spent fuel storage, SFP operating experience (domestic and international), as well as information compiled in NUREG-2161, “Consequence Study of a Beyond-Design-Basis Earthquake Affecting the Spent Fuel Pool for a U.S. Mark I Boiling Water Reactor” (ADAMS Accession No. ML14255A365). In COMSECY-13-0030, the NRC staff concluded that SFPs are robust structures with large safety margins and recommended to the Commission that assessments of possible regulatory actions to require the expedited transfer of spent fuel from SFPs to dry cask storage were not warranted. The Commission subsequently approved the staff's recommendation in the Staff Requirements Memorandum to COMSECY-13-0030 (ADAMS Accession No. ML14143A360). As supported by numerous evaluations referenced in this document, the NRC has determined that the risk of an SFP severe accident is low. While the risk of a severe accident in an SFP is not negligible, the NRC believes that the risk is low because of the conservative design of SFPs; operational criteria to control spent fuel movement, monitor pertinent parameters, and maintain cooling capability; mitigation measures in place if there is loss of cooling capability or water; and emergency preparedness measures to protect the public. The information proposed to be provided to the NRC is not needed for the effectiveness of NRC's approach for ensuring SFP safety. The NRC notes that the issue of long-term cooling of SFPs is the subject of PRM-50-96, which was accepted for consideration in the rulemaking process (77 FR 74788; December 18, 2012) and is being addressed by the NRC's rulemaking regarding mitigation of beyond design-basis events (RIN 3150-AJ49; NRC-2014-0240). Issue 2: Annual Licensee SFP Safety Evaluations and Submission of Results to the NRC Is Necessary So That the NRC Is Aware of Potential Consequences of Postulated SFP Accident/Fire Scenarios as Fuel Assemblies Are Added, Removed, or Reconfigured in Licensees' SFPs The petitioner stated that the purpose of the proposed requirement is to keep the NRC informed of the potential consequences of postulated SFP accident/fire scenarios as fuel assemblies are added, removed, or reconfigured in licensees' SFPs. NRC Response The NRC does not agree that this is necessary because the NRC already evaluates SFP systems and structures during initial licensing and license amendment reviews. In addition, baseline NRC inspections provide ongoing oversight to ensure adequate protection. There are not sufficient benefits that would justify the new requirement proposed in the petition for SFP accident evaluations. The proposed new requirement for licensees to perform SFP evaluations would not prevent or mitigate an SFP accident or provide information that is necessary for regulatory decisionmaking. The annual licensee SFP safety evaluations and their results proposed to be provided to the NRC are not needed for the effectiveness of the NRC's approach to ensuring SFP safety. The NRC issues licenses after reviewing and approving the design and licensing bases contained in the plant's safety analysis report. Licensees are required to operate the plant, including performing operations and surveillances related to spent fuel, in accordance with technical specifications and established practices and procedures for that plant. Any licensee changes to design, operational or surveillance practices, or approved spent fuel inventory limits or configuration changes must be evaluated using the criteria in 10 CFR 50.59, documented and retained for the duration of the operating license, and, if warranted, submitted to the NRC for prior approval. The general design criteria
(GDC)in appendix A to 10 CFR part 50 establish general expectations that licensees must meet through compliance with their plant-specific licensing basis. Several GDC apply to SFPs: • Protecting against natural phenomena and equipment failures (GDC 2 and GDC 4); • Preventing a substantial loss-of-coolant inventory under accident conditions ( *e.g.,* equipment failure or loss of decay and residual heat removal) (GDC 61); • Preventing criticality of the spent fuel (GDC 62); and • Adequately monitoring the SFP conditions for loss of decay heat removal and radiation (GDC 63). Additionally, emergency procedures and mitigating strategies are in place to address unexpected challenges to spent fuel safety. Multiple requirements in 10 CFR part 50, as well as recent NRC orders following the Fukushima Dai-ichi accident, require redundant equipment and strategies to address loss of cooling to SFPs and protective actions for plant personnel and the public to limit exposure to radioactive materials. The NRC provides oversight of the licensee's overall plant operations and the SFP in several ways. The NRC inspectors ensure that spent fuel is stored safely by regularly inspecting reactor and equipment vendors; inspecting the design, construction, and use of equipment; and observing “dry runs” of procedures. At least two NRC resident inspectors are assigned to each site to provide monitoring and inspection of routine and special activities. They are aware of, and routinely observe, SFP activities involving fuel manipulation. The NRC inspectors use inspection procedures to guide periodic inspection activities, and the results are published in publicly-available inspection reports. Special inspections may be conducted, as necessary, to evaluate root causes and licensee corrective actions if site-specific events occur. Special inspections may also evaluate generic actions taken by some or all licensees as a result of an NRC order or a change in regulations. In accordance with 10 CFR part 21, the NRC is informed of defects and noncompliances associated with basic components, which include SFPs and associated drain pipes and safety-related systems, structures, and components for makeup water. This information allows the NRC to take additional regulatory action as necessary with respect to defects and noncompliances. The NRC is also informed of events and conditions at nuclear power plants, as set forth in §§ 50.72 and 50.73. Depending upon the nature of the event or condition, a nuclear power plant licensee must inform the NRC within a specified period of time of the licensee's corrective action taken or planned to be taken. These reports also facilitate effective and timely NRC regulatory oversight. Finally, information identified by a nuclear power plant applicant or licensee as having a significant implication for public health and safety or common defense and security must be reported to the NRC within 2 days of the applicant's or licensee's identification of the information. The annual evaluations requested in the petition would not provide information that is necessary for regulatory decisionmaking. The evaluations requested in the petition would postulate scenarios in which the normal cooling systems, the backup cooling methods, and the mitigation strategies have all failed to cool the stored fuel and would require the calculation of the time it would take for the stored fuel to ignite and how much of it would ignite. Due to the robustness of this equipment, the NRC views this sequence of events as extremely unlikely to occur. Since the current regulations require that the pool be designed to prevent the loss-of-coolant and subsequent uncovering of the fuel, the information that would be obtained from the proposed requirement in the petition would not impact the current design basis. Moreover, as discussed previously, the NRC's current regulatory infrastructure relevant to SFPs at nuclear power plants in the United States already contains information collection and reporting requirements that support effective NRC regulatory oversight of SFPs. The NRC does not agree that it is necessary to impose a new requirement for licensees to perform annual evaluations of their SFPs because existing requirements and oversight are sufficient to ensure adequate protection of public health and safety. Issue 3: MELCOR Is Not Currently Sufficient To Provide a Conservative Evaluation of Postulated SFP Accident/Fire Scenarios The petitioner requested that the NRC establish requirements for SFP accident evaluation computer models to be used in the annual SFP evaluations requested in Issue 2. The petitioner stated that there are serious flaws with MELCOR, which has been used by the NRC to model severe accident progression in SFPs, and, therefore, MELCOR is not sufficient. NRC Response The NRC does not agree that it is necessary to establish requirements for SFP accident evaluation computer models because the annual SFP evaluations requested in Issue 2 are not necessary for regulatory decisionmaking. Therefore, it is not necessary for the NRC to establish requirements for how such an evaluation should be conducted. Furthermore, the NRC disagrees with the petitioner's statements that MELCOR is flawed. There are inherent uncertainties in the progression of severe accidents. There are many interrelated phenomena that need to be properly understood; otherwise, conservatism in one area may lead to overall non-conservative results. Conservatism can be meaningfully introduced into the relevant analysis after the best estimate analysis is done and uncertainties are properly taken into account. The important question for a severe accident analysis is whether the uncertainties are appropriately considered in the analysis results. For example, Section 9 of the SFP study (NUREG-2161) is devoted to discussing the major uncertainties that can affect the radiological releases ( *e.g.,* hydrogen combustion, core concrete interaction, multi-unit or concurrent accident, or fuel loading). In addition, the regulatory analysis in COMSECY-13-0030 only relied on SFP study insights for the boiling-water reactors with Mark I and II containments, and, even then, the results were conservatively biased towards higher radiological releases. For other designs, the release fractions were based on previous studies ( *i.e.,* NUREG-1738) that used bounding or conservative estimates. The MELCOR computer code is the NRC's best estimate tool for severe accident analysis. It has been validated against experimental data, and it represents the current state of the art in severe accident analysis. In NUREG-2161, the NRC stated that “MELCOR has been developed through the NRC and international research performed since the accident at Three Mile Island in 1979. MELCOR is a fully integrated, engineering-level computer code and includes a broad spectrum of severe accident phenomena with capabilities to model core heatup and degradation, fission product release and transport within the primary system and containment, core relocation to the vessel lower head, and ex-vessel core concrete interaction.” Furthermore, MELCOR has been benchmarked against many experiments, including separate and integral effects tests for a wide range of phenomena. Therefore, the NRC has determined that MELCOR is acceptable for its intended use. Additional information about the capabilities of the MELCOR code to model SFP accidents can be found in the NRC response to stakeholder comments in Appendix E to NUREG-2161. The NRC also addressed questions regarding MELCOR in Appendix D to NUREG-2157, Volume 2, “Generic Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel” (ADAMS Accession No. ML14196A107). III. Conclusion For the reasons described in Section II, “Reasons for Denial,” of this document, the NRC is denying the petition under 10 CFR 2.803. The petitioner failed to present any information or arguments that would warrant the requested amendments. The NRC does not believe that the information that would be reported to the NRC as requested by the petitioner is necessary for effective NRC regulatory decisionmaking with respect to SFPs. The NRC continues to conclude that the current design and licensing requirements for SFPs provide adequate protection of public health and safety. IV. Availability of Documents The documents identified in the following table are available to interested persons as indicated. For more information on accessing ADAMS, see the ADDRESSES section of this document. Date Document ADAMS accession number/ Federal Register citation August 21, 1986 Safety Goals for the Operations of Nuclear Power Plants; Policy Statement; Republication 51 FR 30028. April 1989 NUREG-1353, “Regulatory Analysis for the Resolution of Generic Issue 82, Beyond Design Basis Accidents in Spent Fuel Pools” ML082330232. February 2001 NUREG-1738, “Technical Study of Spent Fuel Pool Accident Risk at Decommissioning Nuclear Power Plants” ML010430066. March 12, 2012 EA-12-049, “Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events” ML12054A735. August 2012 NEI 12-06, “Diverse and Flexible Coping Strategies
(FLEX)Implementation Guide” ML12242A378. August 2012 JLD-ISG-2012-01, “Compliance with Order EA-12-049, Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events” ML12229A174. December 18, 2012 Long-Term Cooling and Unattended Water Makeup of Spent Fuel Pools 77 FR 74788. November 12, 2013 COMSECY-13-0030, “Staff Evaluation and Recommendation for Japan Lessons Learned Tier 3 Issue on Expedited Transfer of Spent Fuel” ML13329A918. May 23, 2014 SRM-COMSECY-13-0030, “Staff Requirements—COMSECY-13-0030—Staff Evaluation and Recommendation for Japan Lessons-Learned Tier 3 Issue on Expedited Transfer of Spent Fuel” ML14143A360. June 19, 2014 Incoming Petition (PRM-50-108) from Mr. Mark Edward Leyse ML14195A388. September 2014 NUREG-2157, “Generic Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel,” Volume 2 ML14196A107. September 2014 NUREG-2161, “Consequence Study of a Beyond-Design-Basis Earthquake Affecting the Spent Fuel Pool for a U.S. Mark I Boiling-Water Reactor” ML14255A365. October 7, 2014 Notice of Docketing for PRM-50-108 79 FR 60383. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 5th day of May, 2016. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary of the Commission. [FR Doc. 2016-11212 Filed 5-12-16; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 3
2 references not yet in our index
- 10 CFR 50
- 10 CFR 21
Citation graph
cites case law
Unknown
Petition for rulemaking; denial
Cite10 CFR 50
Cite10 CFR 21
Cites 5Cited by 0 across 0 sources