Notices. Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce
1,195 words·~5 min read·
/register/2016/05/05/2016-10625A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-560-822, A-557-813, A-570-886, A-583-843, A-549-821, A-552-806, C-552-805] Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From Indonesia, Malaysia, the People's Republic of China, Taiwan, Thailand, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Orders and Countervailing Duty Order AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) and the International Trade Commission (the ITC) have determined that revocation of the antidumping duty
(AD)orders on polyethylene retail carrier bags (PRCBs) from Indonesia, Malaysia, the People's Republic of China (PRC), Taiwan, Thailand, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam) would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an industry in the United States. The Department and the ITC have also determined that revocation of the countervailing duty
(CVD)order on PRCBs from Vietnam would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of net countervailable subsidies and material injury to an industry in the United States. Therefore, the Department is publishing a notice of continuation of the AD orders and CVD order. DATES: *Effective Date:* May 5, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Schauer or Minoo Hatten, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202)482-0410 or
(202)482-1690, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On April 1, 2015, the Department initiated 1 and the ITC instituted 2 five-year (sunset) reviews of the AD orders on PRCBs from Indonesia, Malaysia, the PRC, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam, and the CVD order on PRCBs from Vietnam 3 pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). As a result of its reviews, the Department determined that revocation of the AD orders would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and that revocation of the CVD order would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of net countervailable subsidies. Therefore, the Department notified the ITC of the magnitude of the margins and the net countervailable subsidy rate likely to prevail should the orders be revoked, pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(b) and
(c)of the Act. 4 1 *See Initiation of Five-Year (“Sunset”) Review,* 80 FR 17388 (April 1, 2015). 2 *See Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam; Institution of Five-Year Reviews,* 80 FR 17490 (April 1, 2015). 3 *See Antidumping Duty Orders: Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From Indonesia, Taiwan, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam,* 75 FR 23667 (May 4, 2010); *Antidumping Duty Order: Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From Malaysia,* 69 FR 48203 (August 9, 2004); *Antidumping Duty Order: Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From the People's Republic of China,* 69 FR 48201 (August 9, 2004); *Antidumping Duty Order: Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From Thailand,* 69 FR 48204 (August 9, 2004); and *Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Countervailing Duty Order,* 75 FR 23670 (May 4, 2010). 4 *See Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From Indonesia, Malaysia, the People's Republic of China, Taiwan, Thailand, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders,* 80 FR 39997 (July 13, 2015), and *Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of Expedited First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order,* 80 FR 46539 (August 5, 2015). On April 22, 2016, the ITC published its determination that revocation of the AD orders on PRCBs from Indonesia, Malaysia, the PRC, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam and the CVD order on PRCBs from Vietnam would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act. 5 5 *See Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam; Determinations,* 81 FR 23749 (April 22, 2016). *See also* the letter from the ITC Chairman Meredith M. Broadbent to Deputy Assistant Secretary Christian Marsh dated April 18, 2016. Scopes of the Orders The merchandise covered in the sunset reviews of the AD orders on PRCBs from Indonesia, Malaysia, the PRC, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam and the CVD order on PRCBs from Vietnam is PRCBs, which may be referred to as t-shirt sacks, merchandise bags, grocery bags, or checkout bags. The subject merchandise is defined as non-sealable sacks and bags with handles (including drawstrings), without zippers or integral extruded closures, with or without gussets, with or without printing, of polyethylene film having a thickness no greater than 0.035 inch (0.889 mm) and no less than 0.00035 inch (0.00889 mm), and with no length or width shorter than 6 inches (15.24 cm) or longer than 40 inches (101.6 cm). The depth of the bag may be shorter than 6 inches but not longer than 40 inches (101.6 cm). PRCBs are typically provided without any consumer packaging and free of charge by retail establishments, *e.g.,* grocery, drug, convenience, department, specialty retail, discount stores, and restaurants, to their customers to package and carry their purchased products. The scope of the order excludes
(1)polyethylene bags that are not printed with logos or store names and that are closeable with drawstrings made of polyethylene film and
(2)polyethylene bags that are packed in consumer packaging with printing that refers to specific end-uses other than packaging and carrying merchandise from retail establishments, *e.g.,* garbage bags, lawn bags, trash-can liners. As a result of changes to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), imports of the subject merchandise are currently classifiable under statistical category 3923.21.0085 of the HTSUS. Furthermore, although the HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. Continuation of the Orders As a result of the determinations by the Department and the ITC that revocation of the AD orders and the CVD order would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping and, in the case of Vietnam, countervailable subsidies, and material injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(a), the Department hereby orders the continuation of the AD orders on PRCBs from Indonesia, Malaysia, the PRC, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam and the CVD order on PRCBs from Vietnam. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect cash deposits at the rates in effect at the time of entry for all imports of subject merchandise. The effective date of the continuation of the AD orders and the CVD order will be the date of publication in the **Federal Register** of this notice of continuation. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c)(2), the Department intends to initiate the next five-year review of these orders not later than 30 days prior to the fifth anniversary of the effective date of this continuation notice. These five-year sunset reviews and this notice are in accordance with sections 751(c) and 751(d)(2) of the Act and published pursuant to section 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). Dated: April 28, 2016. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2016-10625 Filed 5-4-16; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources