Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2016-04-28 · Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) · Notices

Notices. Notice of adequacy determination

637 words·~3 min read·/register/2016/04/28/2016-09968·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [EPA-R10-OAR-2015-0854: FRL-9945-88-Region 10] Adequacy Determination for the Medford, Oregon Carbon Monoxide State Implementation Plan for Transportation Conformity Purposes AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice of adequacy determination. SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA)is notifying the public of its finding that the Medford, Oregon second 10-year limited maintenance plan
(LMP)for carbon monoxide
(CO)is adequate for transportation conformity purposes. The LMP was submitted to the EPA by the State of Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ or the State) on December 11, 2015, and a supplement was submitted on December 30, 2015. As a result of our adequacy finding, regional emissions analyses will no longer be required as part of the transportation conformity determinations for CO for the Medford area. DATES: This finding is effective May 13, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The finding will be available at the EPA's conformity Web site: *http://www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/transconf/adequacy.htm.* You may also contact Dr. Karl Pepple, U.S. EPA, Region 10 (OAWT-107), 1200 Sixth Ave., Suite 900, Seattle WA 98101;
(206)553-1778; or by email at *pepple.karl@epa.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action provides notice of the EPA's adequacy finding regarding the second 10-year CO limited maintenance plan
(LMP)for the Medford area for purposes of transportation conformity. The EPA's finding was made pursuant to the adequacy review process for implementation plan submissions delineated at 40 CFR 93.118(f)(1) under which the EPA reviews the adequacy of a state implementation plan
(SIP)submission prior to the EPA's final action on the implementation plan. The State submitted the LMP to the EPA on December 11, 2015, and submitted a supplement to EPA on December 30, 2015. Pursuant to 40 CFR 93.118(f)(1), the EPA notified the public of its receipt of this plan and its review for an adequacy determination on the EPA's Web site and requested public comment by no later than February 22, 2016. The EPA received no comments on the plan during the comment period. As part of our analysis, we also reviewed the State's compilation of public comments and response to comments that were submitted during the State's public process for the LMP. There were no applicable adverse comments directed at the on-road portion of the LMP. Based on our review, the EPA believes it is appropriate to find this LMP adequate for use in transportation conformity determinations prior to final action on the LMP. The EPA notified ODEQ in a letter dated March 1, 2016 (adequacy letter), subsequent to the close of the EPA comment period, that the EPA had found the LMP to be adequate for use in transportation conformity determinations. A copy of the adequacy letter and its enclosure are available in the docket for this action and at the EPA's conformity Web site: *http://www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/transconf/adequacy.htm.* Pursuant to 40 CFR 93.109(e), limited maintenance plans are not required to contain on-road motor vehicle emissions budgets. Accordingly, as a result of this adequacy finding, regional emissions analyses will no longer be required as a part of the transportation conformity determinations for CO for the Medford area. However, other conformity requirements still remain such as consultation (40 CFR 93.112), transportation control measures (40 CFR 93.113), and project level analysis (40 CFR 93.116). Transportation conformity is required by section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act. Transportation conformity to a SIP means that on-road transportation activities will not produce new air quality violations, worsen existing violations, or delay timely attainment of the national ambient air quality standards. The minimum criteria by which we determine whether a SIP is adequate for conformity purposes are specified at 40 CFR 93.118(e)(4). The EPA's analysis of how the LMP satisfies these criteria is found in the adequacy letter and its enclosure. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-767Iq. Dated: April 19, 2016. Dennis J. McLerran, Regional Administrator, Region 10. [FR Doc. 2016-09968 Filed 4-27-16; 8:45 am]
Connections7 off-index
7 references not yet in our index
  • 40 CFR 93.118(f)(1)
  • 40 CFR 93.109(e)
  • 40 CFR 93.112
  • 40 CFR 93.113
  • 40 CFR 93.116
  • 40 CFR 93.118(e)(4)
  • 42 USC 7401-767Iq
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Notice of adequacy determination
Cite40 CFR 93.118(f)(1)
Cite40 CFR 93.109(e)
Cite40 CFR 93.112
Cite40 CFR 93.113
Cite40 CFR 93.116
Cites 7 · showing 5Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.