Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2016-04-14 · Postal Regulatory Commission · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Notice of proposed rulemaking

817 words·~4 min read·/register/2016/04/14/2016-08591·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Postal Regulatory Commission
Action: Notice of proposed rulemaking
Citation: FR Doc. 2016-08591 · Docket No. RM2016-7; Order No. 3225 · 39 CFR 3050

Summary

The Commission is noticing a recent filing requesting that the Commission initiate an informal rulemaking proceeding to consider changes to analytical principles relating to periodic reports (Proposal One). This notice informs the public of the filing, invites public comment, and takes other administrative steps.

Dates

Comments are due: May 20, 2016. Reply Comments are due: June 6, 2016.

Supplementary Information

Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Summary of Proposal III. Initial Commission Action IV. Ordering Paragraphs I. Introduction On April 5, 2016, the Postal Service filed a petition pursuant to 39 CFR 3050.11 requesting that the Commission initiate an informal rulemaking proceeding to consider a proposed change in analytical principles relating to periodic reports. 1 The Petition includes a description of Proposal One and several attachments. Petition at 1. 1 Petition of the United States Postal Service Requesting Initiation of a Proceeding to Consider Proposed Changes in Analytical Principles (Proposal One), April 5, 2016 (Petition). Attachment A provides a detailed description of the proposal. Attachment B provides product-level impacts. Attachment C is a technical note on the proposed system estimator. The Postal Service filed a non-public version of Attachment B. Notice of Filing of USPS-RM2016-7/NP1 and Application for Nonpublic Treatment, April 5, 2016. Proposal One seeks the Commission's authorization of a change in the current methodology for reporting revenue, pieces, and weight in the Revenue, Pieces, and Weight (RPW) report 2 for specified international outbound products. Id. 2 The RPW is filed quarterly with the Commission pursuant to 39 CFR 3050.25. Id. at 3. II. Summary of Proposal The proposed methodology and program changes relate to the System for International Revenue and Volume, Outbound, and International Origin Destination Information System (SIRVO) as it relates to RPW reporting for the outbound international product categories in Table 1. Id. at 2-3. Table 1—List of Affected Outbound International Product Categories Market dominant Competitive Outbound First-Class Mail International Outbound Priority Mail International. U.S. Postal Service Mail Outbound Direct Sacks (M-bags). Free Mail First-Class Package International Service. International Ancillary Services International Ancillary Services. Source: Petition at 2-3. Under Proposal One, the Postal Service seeks to enhance the data and estimates of the SIRVO. Id. at 2. The current SIRVO estimator of revenue and pieces is a probability-based statistical expansion estimator, which uses sample data. Id. at 3. The proposed SIRVO estimator would be a model-based regression estimator, based on census data. Id. at 5. This proposed estimator would also include census data from additional sources at a more granular level. Id. at 7. The Postal Service asserts that adoption of this proposal will significantly reduce the margins of error for product revenues and volumes. Id. at 10. These improvements will primarily affect estimates for Priority Mail International, First-Class Mail International, and First-Class Package International Service. Id. The Postal Service further asserts that “approximately 50 percent of the revenue . . . of the proposed SIRVO's product estimates for FY2015 are based upon census data sources.” Id. at 8. Proposal One would not affect the amount of total FY 2015 revenue, but total competitive revenue would increase, with a corresponding decrease in market dominant revenue. Id. at 8-9. Total FY 2015 volume would increase, with competitive volumes increasing and market dominant volumes decreasing. Id. III. Initial Commission Action The Commission establishes Docket No. RM2016-7 for consideration of matters raised by the Petition. Additional information concerning the Petition may be accessed via the Commission's Web site at . Interested persons may submit comments on the Petition and Proposal One no later than May 20, 2016. Reply comments are due no later than June 6, 2016. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Cassie D'Souza is designated as an officer of the Commission to represent the interests of the general public (Public Representative) in this proceeding. IV. Ordering Paragraphs It is ordered: 1. The Commission establishes Docket No. RM2016-7 for consideration of the matters raised by the Petition of the United States Postal Service Requesting Initiation of a Proceeding to Consider Proposed Changes in Analytical Principles (Proposal One), filed April 5, 2016. 2. Comments are due no later than May 20, 2016. Reply comments are due no later than June 6, 2016. 3. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, the Commission appoints Cassie D'Souza to serve as Public Representative in this docket. 4. The Secretary shall arrange for publication of this order in the Federal Register . By the Commission. Stacy L. Ruble, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2016-08591 Filed 4-13-16; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 3
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.