Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2016-03-28 · Copyright Royalty Board, Library of Congress · Notices

Notices. Final distribution order

437 words·~2 min read·/register/2016/03/28/2016-06923

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 1410-30-P LIBRARY OF CONGRESS Copyright Royalty Board [Docket No. 2008-2 CRB CD 2000-2003 (Phase II)] Distribution of the 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003 Cable Royalty Funds AGENCY: Copyright Royalty Board, Library of Congress. ACTION: Final distribution order. SUMMARY: The Copyright Royalty Judges announce the final Phase II distribution of cable royalty funds for the years 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003 for the Program Suppliers programming category. DATES: Effective March 28, 2016. ADDRESSES: The final distribution order also is posted on the Copyright Royalty Board Web site at *http://www.loc.gov/crb.* FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kimberly Whittle, Attorney Advisor. Telephone:
(202)707-7658; Email: *crb@loc.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The captioned consolidated royalty distribution proceeding concluded on August 14, 2015, when the United States Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit issued a mandate relating to their June 30, 2015, order affirming the distribution shares for claimants in the Program Suppliers category as determined by the Copyright Royalty Judges (Judges). After the mandate, the Judges received filings from Worldwide Subsidy Group dba Independent Producers Group
(IPG)and the Motion Picture Association of America
(MPAA)contesting the appropriate methodology for distribution of the remaining royalty funds on deposit. By order dated November 25, 2015, the Judges directed MPAA to provide historical context from which the Judges and the Licensing Division of the Copyright Office could distribute accurately the funds, taking into account prior partial distributions, fund growth through accrued interest, and deductions for Licensing Division costs. MPAA provided the necessary information on December 7, 2015. The Licensing Division staff provided accounting services to assure accurate distribution in accordance with the Judges' orders. The Licensing Division calculated that, as of February 17, 2016, the total distribution to IPG for each royalty year should be: 2000 $617,719 2001 164,203 2002 197,725 2003 125,884 Total 1,105,531 Now, therefore, the Judges hereby *order* that the Licensing Division make final distribution to IPG from the Program Suppliers category for the years 2000 through 2003, inclusive, in the amounts listed, adjusted if necessary to reflect interest accrued or costs incurred from and after February 17, 2016, to the date of distribution. The Judges *further order* that the Licensing Division distribute simultaneously the remaining funds in the Program Suppliers category for royalty years 2000 through 2003, inclusive, to MPAA, adjusted if necessary to reflect interest accrued or costs incurred from and after February 17, 2016. The Judges *further order* that IPG and MPAA provide to the Licensing Division all necessary and pertinent information to facilitate the transfer by March 31, 2016. Dated: March 23, 2016. Suzanne M. Barnett, Chief Copyright Royalty Judge. [FR Doc. 2016-06923 Filed 3-25-16; 8:45 am]
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.