Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2016-02-17 · Surface Transportation Board · Notices

Notices. Final rule

966 words·~4 min read·/register/2016/02/17/2016-03199

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD 49 CFR Part 1180 [Docket No. EP 714] Information Required in Notices and Petitions Containing Interchange Commitments AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The Surface Transportation Board (STB or Board) is issuing a final rule to insert language that was inadvertently omitted when an amended rule was promulgated on September 5, 2013. This decision is effective on its date of publication. DATES: This rule is effective on February 17, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy C. Ziehm at
(202)245-0391. Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through the Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS)at
(800)877-8339. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 5, 2013, the Board, with Vice Chairman Begeman dissenting, adopted final rules that established additional disclosure requirements for notices and petitions for exemption where the underlying lease or line sale includes an interchange commitment. *Information Required in Notices and Petitions Containing Interchange Commitments* (2013 Final Rules), EP 714 (STB served Sept. 5, 2013). Interchange commitments are “contractual provisions included with a sale or lease of a rail line that limit the incentive or the ability of the purchaser or tenant carrier to interchange traffic with rail carriers other than the seller or lessor railroad.” *Review of Rail Access & Competition Issues—Renewed Pet. of the W. Coal Traffic League,* EP 575, slip op. at 1 (STB served Oct. 30, 2007). The purpose of this rulemaking was to improve the ability of the Board and affected parties to determine at the outset whether a transaction that includes an interchange commitment is appropriate for the exemption process or raises competitive issues that require a more detailed examination. The 2013 Final Rules' addition of a requirement to certify the existence of any interchange commitments was intended to apply to all notices and petitions for exemption involving transactions where the underlying lease or line sale could include an interchange commitment. 2013 Final Rules 1, 3. The Board included such language in the amended versions of 1121.3(d)(1), 1150.33(h)(1), and 1150.43(h)(1). Due to an oversight, however, the introductory language of 49 CFR 1180.4(g)(4)(i) was not modified. This inadvertent error will now be addressed by amending 49 CFR 1180.4(g)(4)(i). Specifically, 49 CFR 1180.4(g)(4)(i) will now state that the filing party must certify whether or not a proposed acquisition or operation of a rail line involves a provision or agreement that may limit future interchange with a third-party connecting carrier, whether by outright prohibition, per-car penalty, adjustment in the purchase price or rental, positive economic inducement, or other means (“interchange commitment”). Futhermore, 49 CFR 1180.4(g)(4)(i) will now state that if such a provision or agreement exists, additional information must be provided (the information in paragraphs (g)(4)(i)(B), (D), and
(G)of this section may be filed with the Board under 49 CFR 1104.14(a) and will be kept confidential without need for the filing of an accompanying motion for a protective order under 49 CFR 1104.14(b)). As this action relates solely to the rules of agency practice and procedure, it will be issued as a final rule without requesting public comment. 1 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(A). 1 Board procedures allow for the issue of final rules without notice or comment when those rules are interpretive, general statements of policy, or relate to organization, procedure, or practice before the Board. *See* 49 CFR 1110.3(a). In the 2013 Final Rules, the Board certified that the rules as amended would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612. 2013 Final Rules 8. The Board further analyzed the burdens associated with the additional filing requirements pursuant to Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501-3549 and stated its belief that the additional disclosure requirements would not discourage parties from entering into efficiency-enhancing transactions. *See* 2013 Final Rules 6, 8. Those analyses and conclusions apply equally to this decision, and therefore, we adopt those analyses and conclusions and certify under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the RFA. List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 1180 Administrative practice and procedure, Railroads, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. *It is ordered:* 1. The Board adopts the final rule as set forth in this decision. Notice of the adopted rules will be published in the **Federal Register** . 2. This decision is effective on the date of publication. By the Board, Chairman Elliot, Vice Chairman Miller, and Commissioner Begman. Raina S. Contee, Clearance Clerk. For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Surface Transportation Board amends part 1180 title 49, chapter X, of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows: PART 1180—RAILROAD ACQUISITION, CONTROL, MERGER, CONSOLIDATION PROJECT, TRACKAGE RIGHTS, AND LEASE PROCEDURES 1. The authority for part 1180 continues to read as follows: Authority: 5 U.S.C. 553 and 559; 11 U.S.C. 1172; 49 U.S.C. 721, 10502, 11323-11325. 2. Amend § 1180.4 by revising paragraphs (g)(4)(i) introductory text to read as follows: 1180.4 Procedures.
(g)* * *
(4)*Transactions imposing interchange commitments.*
(i)The filing party must certify whether or not a proposed acquisition or operation of a rail line involves a provision or agreement that may limit future interchange with a third-party connecting carrier, whether by outright prohibition, per-car penalty, adjustment in the purchase price or rental, positive economic inducement, or other means (“interchange commitment”). If such a provision or agreement exists, the following additional information must be provided (the information in paragraphs (g)(4)(i)(B), (D), and
(G)of this section may be filed with the Board under 49 CFR 1104.14(a) and will be kept confidential without need for the filing of an accompanying motion for a protective order under 49 CFR 1104.14(b)): [FR Doc. 2016-03199 Filed 2-16-16; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 3
8 references not yet in our index
  • 49 CFR 1180
  • 49 CFR 1180.4(g)(4)(i)
  • 49 CFR 1104.14(a)
  • 49 CFR 1104.14(b)
  • 49 CFR 1110.3(a)
  • 5 USC 601-612
  • 44 USC 3501-3549
  • 49 USC 721
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Final rule
Cite49 CFR 1180
Cite49 CFR 1180.4(g)(4)(i)
Cite49 CFR 1104.14(a)
Cite49 CFR 1104.14(b)
Cite49 CFR 1110.3(a)
Cites 11 · showing 8Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.