Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2015-11-02 · U.S. International Trade Commission · Notices

Notices. Notice

687 words·~3 min read·/register/2015/11/02/2015-27815·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337-TA-959] Certain Electric Skin Care Devices, Brushes and Chargers Therefore, and Kits Containing the Same: Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting-in-Part Complainant's Motion for Leave To Amend the Amended Complaint and Notice of Investigation AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (“ID”) (Order No. 22) of the presiding administrative law judge (“ALJ”) granting-in-part complainant's motion for leave to amend the amended complaint and notice of investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202)205-3115. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202)205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at *http://www.usitc.gov.* The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket
(EDIS)at *http://edis.usitc.gov.* Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on
(202)205-1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (“Section 337”), on June 25, 2015, based on a complaint filed by Pacific Bioscience Laboratories, Inc. of Redmond, Washington (“PBL”) on April 30, 2015. An amended complaint was filed on May 20, 2015. 80 FR 36576-77 (Jun. 25, 2015). The amended complaint, as supplemented, alleges a violation of Section 337 by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,320,691 (“the '691 patent”) and 7,386,906, and U.S. Design Patent No. D523,809 by numerous respondents. The amended complaint further alleges violations of Section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, or in the sale of certain electric skin care devices, brushes and chargers therefor, and kits containing the same, by reason of trade dress infringement, the threat or effect of which is to destroy or substantially injure an industry in the United States. *Id.* The Commission's Office of Unfair Import Investigations (“OUII”) was also named as a party. On September 11, 2015, complainant PBL filed a motion pursuant to 19 CFR 210.14(b) seeking leave to amend its amended complaint and the Commission's notice of investigation to
(1)change the name of respondent “Michael Todd True Organics LP” to “Michael Todd LP” in order to reflect the new name of that entity;
(2)assert violation as to an additional accused product of respondents Michael Todd LP and MTTO LLC (collectively, “MT”); and
(3)assert infringement of additional claims of the '691 patent by MT's accused products. On September 23, 2015, the Commission investigative attorney filed a response supporting the motion in part and opposing the motion in part. On September 28, 2015, PBL filed a reply brief. On October 2, 2015, the ALJ issued Order No. 22, granting-in-part and denying-in-part complainant's motion. The ALJ granted PBL's motion with respect to changing the name of respondent “Michael Todd True Organics LP” to “Michael Todd LP” and accusing an additional MT product of infringement. Order No. 22 at 6. The ALJ denied the motion with respect to PBL's assertion of additional infringement claims against MT under the '691 patent. Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.14(b), the name change of respondent “Michael Todd True Organics LP” to “Michael Todd LP” is an ID. No party petitioned for review of the subject ID, and the Commission has determined not to review it. The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: October 27, 2015. William R. Bishop, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2015-27815 Filed 10-30-15; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 2
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 19 CFR 210
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Notice
Cite19 CFR 210
Cites 3Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.