Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2015-08-07 · DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION · Notices

Notices. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

498 words·~2 min read·/register/2015/08/07/2015-19492

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4910-59-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Surface Transportation Board [Docket No. FD 35945] Regional Rail Holdings, LLC—Acquisition of Control Exemption—Regional Rail, LLC Regional Rail Holdings, LLC (Regional Holdings), a noncarrier, has filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(2) to acquire control of Regional Rail, LLC (Regional Rail), a holding company for three Class III rail carriers, East Penn Railroad, LLC, Middletown & New Jersey Railroad, LLC, and Tyburn Railroad LLC.
The transaction is expected to be consummated on or after August 22, 2015, the effective date of the exemption. 1 1 In its verified notice, Regional Holdings requests expedited consideration to minimize potential disruption to its business as a result of the change in majority ownership due to its acquisition of Regional Rail. However, to permit the exemption to become effective before the scheduled 30-day consummation date, a party must file a separate petition for partial waiver of 49 CFR 1150.32(b), including its supporting rationale, which would be decided by the entire Board. *See The Great Lake Port Corp. d/b/a Grand River Ry.—Acquis. & Operation Exemption—CSX Transp., Inc.,* FD 35888 (STB served Dec. 24, 2014).
Applicants state that:
(i)The railroads will not connect with each other or any railroad in their corporate family;
(ii)the subject acquisition of control is not part of a series of anticipated transactions that would connect the railroads with each other or any railroad in their corporate family; and
(iii)the transaction does not involve a Class I carrier. Therefore, the transaction is exempt from the prior approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. 11323. *See* 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(2). Under 49 U.S.C. 10502(g), the Board may not use its exemption authority to relieve a rail carrier of its statutory obligation to protect the interests of its employees. Section 11326(c), however, does not provide for labor protection for transactions under sections 11324 and 11325 that involve only Class III rail carriers. Because this transaction involves Class III rail carriers only, the Board, under the statute, may not impose labor protective conditions for this transaction. If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, the exemption is void *ab initio.* Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically stay the effectiveness of the exemption. Petitions to stay must be filed no later than August 15, 2015 (at least seven days before the exemption becomes effective). An original and 10 copies of all pleadings referring to Docket No. FD 35945, must be filed with the Surface Transportation Board, 395 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be served on Mary Anne Mason, Crowell & Moring LLP, 1001 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20004. Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at *WWW.STB.DOT.GOV.* Decided: August 4, 2015. By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of Proceedings. Kenyatta Clay, Clearance Clerk. [FR Doc. 2015-19492 Filed 8-6-15; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 2
2 references not yet in our index
  • 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(2)
  • 49 CFR 1150.32(b)
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Cite49 CFR 1180.2(d)(2)
Cite49 CFR 1150.32(b)
Cites 4Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.