Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2015-04-22 · Food and Drug Administration, HHS · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Final rule; correction

298 words·~1 min read·/register/2015/04/22/2015-09301·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration 21 CFR Parts 1 and 16 [Docket No. FDA-2013-N-0365] Administrative Detention of Drugs Intended for Human or Animal Use; Correction AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Final rule; correction. SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration
(FDA)is correcting a final rule entitled “Administrative Detention of Drugs Intended for Human or Animal Use” that appeared in the **Federal Register** of May 29, 2014 (79 FR 30716). The rule sets forth the procedures for detention of drugs believed to be adulterated or misbranded and amends the scope of FDA's part 16 regulatory hearing procedures to include the administrative detention of drugs. The rule published with incorrect statements regarding the impact of the final rule on small entities. This document corrects those errors. DATES: Effective April 22, 2015 and applicable beginning June 30, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily Leongini, Office of Regulatory Affairs, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 32, Rm. 4339, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-5300, *FDASIAImplementationORA@fda.hhs.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the **Federal Register** of May 29, 2014, in FR Doc. 2014-12458, the following corrections are made: 1. On page 30718, in the third column, under “Analysis of Impacts (Summary of the Regulatory Impact Analysis),” the last sentence of the second paragraph is corrected to read: “FDA certifies that this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.” 2. On page 30719, in the first column, the third sentence of the last full paragraph is corrected to read: “We certify that this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.” Dated: April 16, 2015. Leslie Kux, Associate Commissioner for Policy. [FR Doc. 2015-09301 Filed 4-21-15; 8:45 am]
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.