Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2015-04-03 · Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Final rule

1,190 words·~5 min read·/register/2015/04/03/2015-07505

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 95 [Docket No. 31012; Amdt. No. 519] IFR Altitudes; Miscellaneous Amendments AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: This amendment adopts miscellaneous amendments to the required IFR (instrument flight rules) altitudes and changeover points for certain Federal airways, jet routes, or direct routes for which a minimum or maximum en route authorized IFR altitude is prescribed.
This regulatory action is needed because of changes occurring in the National Airspace System. These changes are designed to provide for the safe and efficient use of the navigable airspace under instrument conditions in the affected areas. DATES: *Effective Date:* 0901 UTC, April 30, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Harry Hodges, Flight Procedure Standards Branch (AMCAFS-420), Flight Technologies and Programs Division, Flight Standards Service, Federal Aviation Administration, Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd.
Oklahoma City, OK 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box 25082 Oklahoma City, OK 73125) telephone:
(405)954-4164. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This amendment to part 95 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 95) amends, suspends, or revokes IFR altitudes governing the operation of all aircraft in flight over a specified route or any portion of that route, as well as the changeover points
(COPs)for Federal airways, jet routes, or direct routes as prescribed in part 95. The Rule The specified IFR altitudes, when used in conjunction with the prescribed changeover points for those routes, ensure navigation aid coverage that is adequate for safe flight operations and free of frequency interference. The reasons and circumstances that create the need for this amendment involve matters of flight safety and operational efficiency in the National Airspace System, are related to published aeronautical charts that are essential to the user, and provide for the safe and efficient use of the navigable airspace. In addition, those various reasons or circumstances require making this amendment effective before the next scheduled charting and publication date of the flight information to assure its timely availability to the user. The effective date of this amendment reflects those considerations. In view of the close and immediate relationship between these regulatory changes and safety in air commerce, I find that notice and public procedure before adopting this amendment are impracticable and contrary to the public interest and that good cause exists for making the amendment effective in less than 30 days. Conclusion The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current. It, therefore—(1) is not a “significant regulatory action” under Executive Order 12866;
(2)is not a “significant rule” under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and
(3)does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. For the same reason, the FAA certifies that this amendment will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 95 Airspace, Navigation (air). Issued in Washington, DC on March 27, 2015. John Duncan, Director, Flight Standards Service. Adoption of the Amendment Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, part 95 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 95) is amended as follows effective at 0901 UTC, April 30, 2015. 1. The authority citation for part 95 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40106, 40113, 40114, 40120, 44502, 44514, 44719, 44721. 2. Part 95 is amended to read as follows: §§ 95.4000, 95.4024, 95.6001, 95.6070, 95.6071, 95.6114, 95.6133, 95.6145, 95.6194, 95.6420, 95.6438, 95.6511, 95.6559, 95.6566, 95.7001, 95.7002, 95.7138, 95.7590, 95.8003 [AMENDED] Revisions to IFR Altitudes & Changeover Point [Amendment 519 effective date April 30, 2015] From To MEA MAA § 95.4000 High Altitude RNAV Routes § 95.4024 RNAV Route Q24 is Amended to Read in Part Lake Charles, LA Vortac Fighting Tiger, LA Vortac * 20000 45000 * 18000—GNSS MEA * DME/DME/IRU MEA Fighting Tiger, LA VORTAC Irube, MS WP * 20000 45000 * 18000—GNSS MEA * DME/DME/IRU MEA Irube, MS WP Paytn, AL FIX * 20000 45000 * 18000—GNSS MEA * DME/DME/IRU MEA From To MEA § 95.6001 Victor Routes—U.S. § 95.6070 VOR Federal Airway V70 is Amended to Read in Part Lafayette, LA VORTAC * Rosey, LA FIX 2100 * 5000—MRA * Rosey, LA FIX Fighting Tiger, LA VORTAC 2100 * 5000—MRA Fighting Tiger, LA VORTAC Picayune, MS VOR/DME 2000 § 95.6071 VOR Federal Airway V71 is Amended to Read in Part Fighting Tiger, LA VORTAC Wrack, LA FIX 2200 § 95.6114 VOR Federal Airway V114 is Amended to Read in Part * Mikle, LA FIX Fighting Tiger, LA VORTAC 2000 * 3000—MRA Fighting Tiger, LA VORTAC Veils, LA FIX 2800 Veils, LA FIX Reserve, LA VOR/DME 2000 § 95.6133 VOR Federal Airway V133 is Amended to Read in Part * Ladin, MI FIX Traverse City, MI VOR/DME ** 5000 * 5000—MRA ** 2800—MOCA § 95.6145 VOR Federal Airway V145 is Amended to Read in Part Utica, NY VORTAC Weepy, NY FIX * 3400 * 3000—MOCA Weepy, NY FIX Floor, NY FIX * 3000 * 2200—MOCA Floor, NY FIX Watertown, NY VORTAC * 3000 * 2700—MOCA Watertown, NY VORTAC U.S. Canadian Border * 3000 * 1800—MOCA § 95.6194 VOR Federal Airway V194 is Amended to Read in Part Lafayette, LA VORTAC * Rosey, LA FIX 2100 * 5000—MRA * Rosey, LA FIX Fighting Tiger, LA VORTAC 2100 * 5000—MRA Fighting Tiger, LA VORTAC McComb, MS VORTAC 2300 § 95.6420 VOR Federal Airway V420 is Amended to Read in Part Traverse City, MI VOR/DME Gaylord, MI VOR/DME #3000 #Traverse City R-062 Unusable Use Gaylord R-247 § 95.6511 VOR Federal Airway V511 is Amended to Read in Part Lakeland, FL VORTAC Hallr, FL FIX * 4000 * 2300—MOCA § 95.6559 VOR Federal Airway V559 is Amended to Read in Part Lafayette, LA VORTAC Fighting Tiger, LA VORTAC 2100 § 95.6566 VOR Federal Airway V566 is Amended to Read in Part Veils, LA FIX Reserve, LA VOR/DME 2000 § 95.6438 Alaska VOR Federal Airway V438 is Amended to Read in Part * Sures, AK FIX Liber, AK FIX #** 11000 * 10000—MRA ** 8900—MOCA #MEA is Established With a Gap in Navigation Signal Coverage. From To MEA MAA § 95.7001 Jet Routes § 95.7002 Jet Route J2 is Amended to Read in Part Lake Charles, LA VORTAC Fighting Tiger, LA VORTAC 18000 45000 Fighting Tiger, LA VORTAC Semmes, AL VORTAC 18000 45000 § 95.7138 Jet Route J138 is Amended to Read in Part Lake Charles, LA VORTAC Fighting Tiger, LA VORTAC 18000 45000 Fighting Tiger, LA VORTAC Semmes, AL VORTAC 18000 45000 § 95.7590 Jet Route J590 is Amended to Read in Part Lake Charles, LA VORTAC Fighting Tiger, LA VORTAC 18000 45000 Fighting Tiger, LA VORTAC Greene County, MS VORTAC 18000 45000 Airway segment From To Changeover points Distance From § 95.8003 VOR Federal Airway Changeover Point V285 is Amended to Delete Changeover Point Manistee, MI VOR/DME Traverse City, MI VOR/DME 29 Manistee [FR Doc. 2015-07505 Filed 4-2-15; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 2
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 14 CFR 95
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Final rule
Cite14 CFR 95
Cites 3Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.