Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2015-01-06 · Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation (DOT) · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Proposed rule; withdrawal

870 words·~4 min read·/register/2015/01/06/2014-30911·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation (DOT)
Action: Proposed rule; withdrawal
Citation: FR Doc. 2014-30911 · RIN 2120-AA64 · Docket No. FAA-2012-1319; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-179-AD · 14 CFR 39

Summary

The FAA withdraws a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) that proposed to revise Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2012-12-15, which applies to all The Boeing Company Model 757 airplanes. The NPRM would have corrected errors in certain paragraph references in AD 2012-12-15; continued to require revising the maintenance program by incorporating new and revised fuel tank system limitations in the Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) section of the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness; and continued to require the initial inspection of certain repetitive AWL inspections to phase-in those inspections, and repair if necessary. Since the proposed AD was issued, we have received new data that the unsafe condition has been addressed by AD 2012-12-15, and the compliance relief that would have been provided by the proposed AD is no longer relevant. Accordingly, the proposed AD is withdrawn.

Dates

As of January 6, 2015, the proposed rule, which was published in the Federal Register on January 30, 2013 (78 FR 6247), is withdrawn.

Supplementary Information

Discussion We proposed to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) with a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to revise AD 2012-12-15, Amendment 39-17095 (77 FR 42964, July 23, 2012), which applies to all The Boeing Company Model 757 airplanes. That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on January 30, 2013 (78 FR 6247). The NPRM would have corrected errors in certain paragraph references in AD 2012-12-15; continued to require revising the maintenance program by incorporating new and revised fuel tank system limitations in the AWLs section of the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness; and continued to require the initial inspection of certain repetitive AWL inspections to phase-in those inspections, and repair if necessary. The NPRM resulted from the discovery of errors in certain paragraph references in AD 2012-12-15. The proposed actions were intended to prevent the potential for ignition sources inside fuel tanks caused by latent failures, alterations, repairs, or maintenance actions, which in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result in a fuel tank explosion and consequent loss of the airplane. Actions Since NPRM (78 FR 6247, January 30, 2013) Was Issued Since we issued the NPRM (78 FR 6247, January 30, 2013), commenters identified errors in the service information that was referenced in the NPRM. We reviewed those errors, considered the amount of time needed to address those errors in the service information, and re-considered the effect of the errors identified in AD 2012-12-15, Amendment 39-17095 (77 FR 42964, July 12, 2012). The identified errors in AD 2012-12-15 could have the unintended effect of implying that the grace period was 24 months after June 12, 2008 (which is the effective date of AD 2008-10-11, Amendment 39-15517 (73 FR 25974, May 8, 2008)), which is earlier than the intended 24 months after August 27, 2012 (the effective date of AD 2012-12-15). In either case, the grace period will have passed before the new, corrected AD would be effective. The compliance time relief that would have been provided by the new, corrected AD is no longer relevant, and there would be no benefit to publishing that new, corrected AD. FAA's Conclusions Upon further consideration, we have determined that the compliance time relief that would have been provided to operators by the NPRM (78 FR 6247, January 30, 2013) is no longer relevant. Accordingly, the NPRM is withdrawn. Withdrawal of the NPRM (78 FR 6247, January 30, 2013), does not preclude the FAA from issuing another related action or commit the FAA to any course of action in the future. Regulatory Impact Since this action only withdraws an NPRM (78 FR 6247, January 30, 2013), it is neither a proposed nor a final rule and therefore is not covered under Executive Order 12866, the Regulatory Flexibility Act, or DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979). List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. The Withdrawal Accordingly, we withdraw the NPRM, Docket No. FAA-2012-1319, Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-179-AD, which was published in the Federal Register on January 30, 2013 (78 FR 6247). Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 22, 2014. Michael Kaszycki, Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2014-30911 Filed 1-5-15; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 14 CFR 39
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Proposed rule; withdrawal
Cite14 CFR 39
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.