Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2014-08-19 · Federal Communications Commission · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Final rule; denial of petition for reconsideration

445 words·~2 min read·/register/2014/08/19/2014-19417

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4310-RK-P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 47 CFR Part 73 [MB Docket No. 05-112; MB Docket No. 05-151; RM-11185; RM-11374; RM-11222; RM-11258] Radio Broadcasting Services; Converse, Flatonia, Georgetown, Goldthwaite, Ingram, Junction, Lago Vista, Lakeway, Llano, McQueeney, Nolanville, San Antonio, Waco, TX AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Final rule; denial of petition for reconsideration. SUMMARY: This document denies a Petition for Reconsideration filed by Rawhide Radio, LLC, Clear Channel Broadcasting Licenses, Inc., CCB Texas Licenses, LP, and Capstar TX Limited Partnership (“Joint Parties”) of a *Report and Order* that denied a Counterproposal filed by the Joint Parties and granted a mutually exclusive Counterproposal filed by Munbilla Broadcasting Properties, Ltd. *See* Supplementary Information.
ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street SW., Washington, DC 20554. DATES: August 19, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew J. Rhodes, Media Bureau
(202)418-2700. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the consolidated *Memorandum Opinion and Order* in MB Docket No. 05-112 and MB Docket No. 05-151, adopted July 23, 2014, and released July 24, 2014 The full text of this decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC Reference Information Center at Portals ll, CY-A257, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copying and Printing, Inc. 445 12th Street SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1-800-378-3160 or *www.BCPIWEB.com.* Because the Commission is denying the Petition for Reconsideration, the Commission will not send a copy of this *Memorandum Opinion and Order* in a report to Congress and the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, *see* 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A). The Memorandum Opinion and Order denied the Joint Parties Petition for Reconsideration because no error was committed in the *Report and Order* by requiring the Joint Parties Counterproposal to protect a previously filed and cut-off application. *See* 72 FR 37673, July 1, 2007. Although the Joint Parties Counterproposal had been filed and dismissed in an earlier proceeding, the refilling of the Counterproposal does not revive that dismissed proposal or create cut-off rights with regard to proposals in the present proceeding. Likewise, the Memorandum Opinion and Order determined that no error was committed by processing a “cut-off” application and relying on the effective but non-final dismissal of the Joint Parties Counterproposal in the earlier proceeding. Finally, the Memorandum Opinion and Order concluded that an engineering solution submitted by the Joint Parties could not be considered because it was filed late. List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 Radio, Radio broadcasting. Federal Communications Commission. Peter H. Doyle, Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau. [FR Doc. 2014-19417 Filed 8-18-14; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 47 CFR 73
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Final rule; denial of petition for reconsideration
Cite47 CFR 73
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.