Unknown. Final rule

6,094 words·~28 min read·/register/2014/08/13/2014-19173

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

--- schema: federal-register doc_type: fedreg source_file: FR-2014-08-13.xml --- 79 156 Wednesday, August 13, 2014 Contents Agriculture Agriculture Department See Food Safety and Inspection Service See Rural Housing Service NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals, 47416-47417 2014-19108 2014-19109 Air Force Air Force Department NOTICES Environmental Impact Statements; Availability, etc.: Second Main Operating Base KC-46A Beddown at Alternative Air National Guard Installations;

Record of Decision, 47441 2014-19126 Army Army Department See Engineers Corps NOTICES Records of Decision: Implementation of Energy, Water, and Solid Waste Sustainability Initiatives at Fort Bliss, TX and NM, 47441-47442 2014-19125 Centers Disease Centers for Disease Control and Prevention NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals, 47465-47467 2014-19104 2014-19120 Meetings: Compliance with the Import Permit Program; Public Webcast, 47467-47468 2014-19114 Commerce Commerce Department See Foreign-Trade Zones Board See International Trade Administration See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOTICES Privacy Act;

Systems of Records, 47436 2014-19131 Community Living Administration NOTICES Meetings: President's Committee for People with Intellectual Disabilities, 47468 2014-19164 Defense Department Defense Department See Air Force Department See Army Department See Engineers Corps NOTICES Meetings: Representatives of Athletic Shoe Manufacturers, 47440-47441 2014-19181 Education Department Education Department NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals:

Annual Progress Report for the Access to Telework Program under the Rehabilitation Act, 47443-47444 2014-19067 Annual Progress Reporting Form for the American Indian Vocational Rehabilitation Services Program, 47445 2014-19066 National Evaluation of the Investing in Innovation Program, 47444 2014-19059 State Plan of Assistive Technology, 47442-47443 2014-19068 Energy Department Energy Department See Western Area Power Administration NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities;

Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals, 47445-47446 2014-19139 Applications: Freeport LNG Expansion, L.P.; FLNG Liquefaction, etc., 47446-47448 2014-19124 Meetings: President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, 47450-47451 2014-19134 Quadrennial Energy Review, 47449-47450 2014-19138 Renewals: Electricity Advisory Committee, 47451 2014-19133 Engineers Engineers Corps NOTICES Environmental Impact Statements; Availability, etc.: Baryonyx Corp., Proposed Wind Farm, Offshore, Willacy and Cameron Counties, TX, 47442 2014-19127 Environmental Protection Environmental Protection Agency RULES Air Quality State Implementation Plans;

Approvals and Promulgations: Illinois; Amendments to Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Program for Illinois, 47377-47380 2014-17331 NOTICES Pesticide Product Registrations: Receipt of Applications for New Active Ingredients, 47453-47454 2014-19060 Pesticide Registrations: Product Cancellation Orders, 47454-47456 2014-18961 Equal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals, 47456-47457 2014-19135 Executive Office of the President See Management and Budget Office See Presidential Documents Federal Aviation Federal Aviation Administration PROPOSED RULES Airworthiness Directives:

Airbus Airplanes, 47387-47390, 47395-47401 2014-19155 2014-19157 ATR - GIE Avions de Transport Regional Airplanes, 47390-47393 2014-19158 Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes, 47384-47387, 47393-47395 2014-19153 2014-19156 Federal Communications Federal Communications Commission RULES Radio Broadcasting Services: Haynesville, LA, 47380 2014-19162 Various Locations, 47380-47381 2014-19160 NOTICES Meetings, 47457 2014-19136 Federal Deposit Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities;

Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals, 47457-47460 2014-19130 Federal Reserve Federal Reserve System NOTICES Changes in Bank Control: Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank or Bank Holding Company, 47460-47461 2014-19075 2014-19122 Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding Companies; Correction, 47460 2014-19121 Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding Companies, 47461 2014-19123 Federal Trade Federal Trade Commission NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities;

Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals, 47461-47465 2014-19090 2014-19092 Federal Transit Federal Transit Administration NOTICES Research, Technical Assistance, and Training Programs Proposed Circular, 47514-47517 2014-19129 Fish Fish and Wildlife Service PROPOSED RULES Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants: 12-Month Finding on a Petition to List the Warton's Cave Meshweaver as Endangered or Threatened, 47413-47415 2014-19089 Threatened Status, Nonessential Experimental Population of the North American Wolverine, etc.;

Withdrawal, 47522-47545 2014-18743 NOTICES Meetings: Trinity Adaptive Management Working Group; Public Meeting and Teleconference, 47477-47478 2014-19163 Food Safety Food Safety and Inspection Service NOTICES Implementation of FSIS Traceback and Recall Procedures for Escherichia coli Positive Raw Beef Products, 47417-47424 2014-19141 Pre-harvest Management to Reduce Shiga Toxin-producing Escherichia Coli Shedding in Cattle, 47424-47427 2014-19172 Foreign Trade Foreign-Trade Zones Board NOTICES Subzone Status Applications:

Foreign-Trade Zone 158, Vicksburg/Jackson, MS, 47436 2014-19149 Health and Human Health and Human Services Department See Centers for Disease Control and Prevention See Community Living Administration See National Institutes of Health Homeland Homeland Security Department See U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services See U.S. Customs and Border Protection Housing Housing and Urban Development Department RULES Manufactured Housing Program Fee: Final Increase, 47373-47377 2014-19173 NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities;

Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Land Survey Report for Insured Multifamily Projects, 47475 2014-19167 Memorandum of Agreement and Improvement Plan in Connection With the Public Housing Assessment System, 47475-47476 2014-19166 Meetings: Manufactured Housing Consensus Committee Technical Systems Subcommittee, 47476-47477 2014-19171 Indian Affairs Indian Affairs Bureau PROPOSED RULES Rights-of-Way on Indian Land, 47402 2014-19165 Interior Interior Department See Fish and Wildlife Service See Indian Affairs Bureau Internal Revenue Internal Revenue Service NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities;

Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals, 47518 2014-19177 Meetings: Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee, 47519 2014-19169 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notices and Correspondence Project Committee, 47520 2014-19175 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Tax Forms and Publications Project Committee, 47519 2014-19170 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Assistance Center Improvements Project Committee, 47518-47519 2014-19188 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Communications Project Committee, 47519 2014-19185 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Toll-Free Phone Line Project Committee, 47519-47520 2014-19180 International Trade Adm International Trade Administration NOTICES Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Investigations, Orders, or Reviews:

Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil, 47437-47438 2014-19148 Orders to Amend Pesticide Registrations to Terminate Uses: Iprodione, Pendimethalin, and Permethrin, 47438-47439 2014-19061 International Trade Com International Trade Commission NOTICES Investigations; Determinations, Modifications and Rulings, etc.: Saccharin from China, 47478 2014-19081 Justice Department Justice Department NOTICES Consent Decrees under CERCLA, 47478 2014-19055 Proposed Consent Decrees under the Oil Pollution Act, 47478-47479 2014-19111 Proposed Settlement Orders under the Clean Water Act, 47479 2014-19112 Settlement Agreements under the Clean Air Act, 47479-47480 2014-19113 Labor Department Labor Department NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities;

Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Examinations and Testing of Electrical Equipment Including Examination, Testing, and Maintenance of High Voltage Longwalls, 47480-47481 2014-19069 Housing Occupancy Certificate; Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act, 47481-47482 2014-19070 Management Management and Budget Office NOTICES Revised Guidance on Appointment of Lobbyists to Federal Advisory Committees, Boards, and Commissions, 47482-47483 2014-19140 National Endowment for the Arts PROPOSED RULES Implementing the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act, 47402-47413 2014-19034 National Foundation National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities See National Endowment for the Arts National Highway National Highway Traffic Safety Administration NOTICES Meetings:

National Emergency Medical Services Advisory Council, 47517-47518 2014-19119 National Institute National Institutes of Health NOTICES Exclusive Licenses: Identification of Non-invasive Biomarkers of Coordinate Metabolic Reprogramming in Colorectal Tumor, 47468-47469 2014-19144 Meetings: Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 47469 2014-19146 National Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, 47470 2014-19147 National Cancer Institute, 47469-47470 2014-19145 National Oceanic National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration RULES Atlantic Highly Migratory Species:

Atlantic Bluefin Tuna Fisheries, 47381-47382 2014-19106 NOTICES Meetings: New England Fishery Management Council, 47439-47440 2014-19115 Permits: Endangered Species; File No. 17364-01, 47440 2014-19074 Nuclear Regulatory Nuclear Regulatory Commission NOTICES Maintaining the Effectiveness of License Renewal Aging Management Programs, 47483-47484 2014-19194 Nuclear Regulatory Guides: Revisions to NUREG-0800, Chapters 2 and 3, 47484-47485 2014-19192 Office of Management and Budget See Management and Budget Office Presidential Documents Presidential Documents PROCLAMATIONS Special Observances:

National Health Center Week (Proc. 9152), 47547-47550 2014-19346 Rural Housing Service Rural Housing Service PROPOSED RULES Reserve Account, 47383-47384 2014-19086 NOTICES Funding Availability: Rural Community Development Initiative for Fiscal Year 2014, 47427-47436 2014-19132 Securities Securities and Exchange Commission NOTICES Self-Regulatory Organizations; Proposed Rule Changes: BATS Exchange, Inc., 47488-47501 2014-19096 Miami International Securities Exchange LLC, 47504-47506 2014-19094 NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC, 47506-47511 2014-19093 2014-19095 NYSE Arca, Inc., 47502-47504 2014-19097 NYSE MKT LLC, 47485-47487 2014-19098 Small Business Small Business Administration NOTICES Disaster Declarations:

Iowa, 47511-47512 2014-19117 Meetings: Advisory Committee on Veterans Business Affairs, 47512 2014-19116 Interagency Task Force on Veterans Small Business Development, 47512-47513 2014-19118 State Department State Department NOTICES Designations as Foreign Terrorists: Asbat al-Ansar, 47513 2014-19151 Meetings: Shipping Coordinating Committee, 47513 2014-19154 Transportation Department Transportation Department See Federal Aviation Administration See Federal Transit Administration See National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Treasury Treasury Department See Internal Revenue Service U.S.

Citizenship U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery, 47470-47471 2014-19102 Filing Instructions for V Nonimmigrant Status Applicants, 47471-47472 2014-19103 Free Training for Civics and Citizenship of Adults; Civics and Citizenship Toolkit, 47472-47473 2014-19101 Customs U.S. Customs and Border Protection NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities;

Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement, 47473-47474 2014-19088 Commercial Laboratories; Approvals: ST Laboratories Group, LLC; Cancellation, 47474 2014-19087 Meetings: Airport and Seaport Inspections User Fee Advisory Committee, 47474-47475 2014-19110 Western Western Area Power Administration NOTICES Base Charge and Rates: Boulder Canyon Project, 47451-47453 2014-19128 Separate Parts In This Issue Part II Interior Department, Fish and Wildlife Service, 47522-47545 2014-18743 Part III Presidential Documents, 47547-47550 2014-19346 Reader Aids Consult the Reader Aids section at the end of this page for phone numbers, online resources, finding aids, reminders, and notice of recently enacted public laws.

To subscribe to the Federal Register Table of Contents LISTSERV electronic mailing list, go to http://listserv.access.gpo.gov and select Online mailing list archives, FEDREGTOC-L, Join or leave the list (or change settings); then follow the instructions. 79 156 Wednesday, August 13, 2014 Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT 24 CFR Part 3284 [Docket No. FR-5721-F-02] RIN 2502-AJ19 Manufactured Housing Program Fee: Final Fee Increase AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Housing—Federal Housing Commissioner, HUD.

ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: This final rule amends HUD's Manufactured Housing Program Fee regulations to raise the fee for each transportable section of a manufactured home that the manufacturer produces in accordance with HUD's Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards. This fee is referred to as a label fee. After considering public comments on HUD's May 2, 2014, proposed rule, this final rule raises the label fee to $100. DATES: *Effective Date:* September 12, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pamela B. Danner, Administrator, Office of Manufactured Housing Programs, Room 9168, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 20410; telephone number 202-708-6423 (this is not a toll free number). Persons with hearing or speech impairments may access this number via TTY by calling the toll free Federal Relay Service at 1-800-877-8389. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background HUD initiated this rulemaking to amend the amount of the fee collected from manufactured home manufacturers in accordance with section 620 (42 U.S.C. 5419) of the National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974, as amended by the Manufactured Housing Improvement Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 5401 *et seq.* ) (the Act).

Under this authority, HUD collects these fees through the sale of labels which the manufactured home manufacturer must apply to each transportable section of a manufactured housing unit that it produces as evidence that the unit(s) conform to HUD's Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards regulations, codified at 24 CFR part 3280. HUD establishes and collects these fees to offset its expenses for carrying out its responsibilities under the Act, including carrying out inspections, developing manufactured home construction and safety standards under 42 U.S.C. 5403, and making payments to states as required by statute and HUD's regulations (see § 3284.10).

On May 2, 2014, at 79 FR 25035, HUD published a proposed rule for public comment proposing to increase the fee to an amount between $95 and $105 per transportable section of manufactured housing unit produced. In proposing this increase, HUD stated that while it has had authority to modify the fee in order to collect the overall amount of the fee established by HUD's appropriation for the applicable fiscal year, HUD has not exercised this authority since 2002. Given the increased costs related to overseeing the quality, safety, and durability of manufactured housing, the substantial reduction in fee collections since 2002 and, based on HUD's projected production levels of between 95,000 and 105,000 sections, HUD proposed raising the fee to an amount between $95 and $105 per transportable unit.

II. The Commenters The public comment period for the May 2, 2014 (79 FR 25035), proposed rule closed June 2, 2014. HUD received two public comments in response to this proposed rule. The comments were submitted by national trade associations representing the manufactured housing industry. One commenter questioned the magnitude of the increase of the proposed fee but stated that it did not oppose the proposed fee modification, provided that additional revenues derived from the change were utilized to fund legitimate program functions in a manner proportionate to current and projected production levels, and are targeted and utilized to provide enhanced funding for State Administrative Agencies (SAAs).

The second commenter also expressed concern regarding the magnitude of the increase of the proposed fee and stated that the proposed fee is not reflective of current production levels. The commenter also recommended that HUD withdraw the proposed rule and develop a formula for establishing a fee based on production. The following section of this preamble summarizes the significant issues raised by the commenters on the May 2, 2014, proposed rule and HUD's responses to these comments. *Comment:* A commenter stated that HUD's proposed fee was an 143 to 169 percent increase over the current fee and, according to HUD, based on increased program expenses over the last 12 years.

The commenter questioned, however, how program expenses could require such a significant increase in the fee when industry production over the same period decreased by 64 percent. *Response:* Program operating expenses do not have a direct correlation to production levels since monitoring is an ongoing expense. Nevertheless, HUD recognizes the magnitude of the increase. As discussed in the preamble to this rule, however, HUD has not increased the label fee since 2002. Moreover, beginning in fiscal year

(FY)2014 and continuing through FY 2015, HUD plans to improve implementation of two key requirements of the Act. First, HUD plans to obtain contractual support to assist in the administration of the installation standards program in states that have not established approved programs and to assist in administering the dispute resolution program in states that have not established approved dispute resolution programs. HUD through its monitoring contractor also requires services to perform the design monitoring reviews of third party agencies as required by § 3282.452(e). Second, HUD is responsible for updating the construction and safety standards on a 2-year cycle, but has not been able to schedule a meeting of the Manufactured Housing Consensus Committee

(MHCC)since October, 2012. To address this, HUD recently awarded a contract to an Administering Organization as required by the Act and will begin holding regular meetings of the MHCC. Finally, beginning in FY 15, HUD plans to structure the Manufactured Housing Program to be self-supporting. This means that unlike most prior years, HUD will not receive a direct appropriation of funds from Congress but will be dependent on label fees for administering the program. As a result, HUD has and will continue to incur increased costs to administer the program and must establish a label at a level that will allow it to administer the program operations while relying less on additional appropriations from Congress. *Comment:* The second commenter stated that HUD's proposed label fee represents an increase of between 243 and 269 percent over the current fee and fails to consider the overall cost of regulation under the Manufactured Housing program. According to the commenter, the industry pays approximately $6.4 million per year in fees to Production Inspection Primary Inspection Agencies (IPIAs) and Design Approval Primary Inspection Agencies (DAPIAs) in order to comply with the Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards and Regulations. This is in addition to $10 million HUD estimates would be collected in label fees if the fee is increased to $100 per label. While the label fee is an important component of the HUD program, the commenter stated that HUD should consider the overall cost of regulation that is passed to the consumer and the impact on the affordability of manufactured housing prior to establishing a new label fee. *Response:* HUD is cognizant of the fees paid to IPIAs and DAPIAs by manufactured housing manufacturers for design reviews and inspections. However, these fees are a cost of doing business, established by contract or other agreement as agreed upon between the manufacturer and the primary inspection agency or, in the case of a state acting as an exclusive IPIA, by the state. The manufactured housing program fee, on the other hand, represents the fee necessary to offset HUD's expenses in connection with carrying out its responsibilities under the Act. *Comment:* One commenter recommended, given the magnitude of the increase of the proposed fee, that it be phased in over several years. *Response:* Phasing in the increase over several years is not contemplated by the Act which provides that the amount of the fee may only be modified “as specifically authorized in advance of *an annual* appropriation.” (Emphasis added). In addition, phasing in the increase would be difficult to administer and, more importantly, would not provide the funding required by HUD to meet the program's operating expenses for the balance of FY 2014 and FY 2015. *Comment:* A commenter stated that manufacture home production has been slowly increasing from 50,000 homes in 2010 to just over 60,000 in 2013, and that the proposed label fee increase does not consider likely production increases. According to the commenter, while HUD supervision goes up as production rises, the relationship is not linear and that if the fee becomes fixed at $95 to $105, a strong recovery by the industry could result in a windfall for HUD that has not been justified in the proposal. *Response:* In estimating the amount of the fee, HUD included a 5 percent per year production increase based on historic data. However, if there is an unpredicted increase in production, HUD would consider reducing the label fee. *Comment:* A commenter stated that HUD reported in its FY 2012 Congressional Budget Justifications that the responsibilities of its manufactured housing program have remained unchanged. The commenter questioned why the decline in industry production has not resulted in reduced program responsibilities and lower program expenses. The commenter questioned whether the increase in program expenditures might result from factors other than those which justify an increased label fee and must be addressed and corrected by the program going forward. *Response:* As discussed in response to a previous comment, program operating expenses do not have a direct correlation to production levels since monitoring is an ongoing expense. Moreover, the Manufactured Housing Improvement Act of 2000 increased HUD's responsibilities to carry out the requirements of the Act. For example, it established the MHCC and requires that HUD contract with an Administering Organization, hold regular MHCC and subcommittee meetings, and update the standards on a 2-year cycle. In addition, the Manufactured Housing Improvement Act of 2000 requires that HUD establish and revise model installation standards, implement an installation program in states without this program; and approve installation programs in the states that adopted installation standards based on the federal model installation standards and HUD's requirements for an approved installation program. HUD's responsibilities will be increasing as implementation of an installation program in the states without this program will be completed in FY 2015. Finally, HUD was required to establish a model dispute resolution program, administer the program in states that have not adopted such a program, and approve state dispute resolution programs based on the requirements established by HUD for such programs. HUD is also planning to obtain a contractor to fully implement a dispute resolution program in states that did not adopt such a program in FY 2015. *Comment:* A commenter stated, based on its review, that HUD's payments to the program's monitoring contractor have remained constant or increased even as production levels have decreased. According to the commenter, these sustained and increased contractor funding levels, during a period of decline in industry production and a falling number of consumer complaints and referrals to the federal dispute resolution system, is attributable to a major expansion of in-plant regulation with significant “make-work” activities for the program contractor and should be eliminated. According to the commenter, eliminating these unnecessary functions would realize significant cost savings that could be used to fund the functions and operations of the SAAs and properly fund the responsibilities of the Secretary. *Response:* HUD's overall monitoring costs have remained constant or gradually increased over the last few years due to inflation and efforts to enhance quality and reduce non-conformances and the number of consumer complaints. The improvements in overall home quality and reduced levels of consumer complaints are not “make-work” activities as suggested by the commenter. Rather, they are the direct result of the focus of HUD's cooperative monitoring activities and training over the past four years with manufacturers and their inspection agencies to improve overall construction quality. The goals of such monitoring are to reduce the number of consumer complaints and service calls for manufacturers, and enhance the manufacturer's quality assurance programs. While HUD believes that such goals are being achieved, without a similar level of monitoring, these improvements may not be sustained. For these reasons, HUD will be conducting oversight and evaluation of its inspection agencies performance to determine if the improvements put in place over the past four years are being sustained. HUD will consider future reductions in its in-plant monitoring if the results warrant changes in the level of current monitoring activities and may use the savings to fund SAA operations as discussed elsewhere in HUD's responses to the comments. *Comment:* The second commenter echoed these concerns stating that the amount paid to the monitoring contractor has increased to $5 million in 2013 from $3.2 million in 2011. According to the commenter, the costs for the monitoring contractor should be going down, not up. The commenter stated that while ensuring quality assurance in plants has been generally successful, it has also resulted in reduced service calls, fewer consumer complaints, and higher quality homes. According to the commenter, it is logical to conclude that the need for time consuming and costly audits should be reduced. *Response:* HUD agrees with the commenter that quality assurance monitoring has generally been successful. However, this shift in monitoring has been instituted using a training approach at manufacturer facilities over a period of 4 years. While the process appears successful in reducing the number of consumer complaints, the process is more time consuming for auditors and therefore, more expensive. As stated in a prior response, HUD believes that without continuing this level of monitoring, these improvements may not be sustained. *Comment:* A commenter stated that last year annual audits in each plant lasted 3 days. According to the commenter, audits could be shortened by at least one day, saving substantial sums. The commenter also stated cost savings could be realized if audits were conducted with regional planning in mind, so that auditors could visit plants within the same region and save money on air fare. The commenter also stated that the same logic holds for HUD's oversight of the Primary Inspection Agencies and that over time, monitoring and review of the activities of DAPIAs and IPIAs should improve performance and reduce the need for monitoring. *Response:* HUD's current 3-day audit approach is required to conduct an overall and thorough evaluation and quality audit of each inspection agency's performance in each factory. In scheduling audits, HUD travel costs and locations are considered as factors in current contract administration. As previously indicated, HUD agrees that over time, its current monitoring activities could be reduced if supported by inspection agency performance in sustaining improvements in their oversight of manufacturers and their quality assurance programs and reductions in non-conformances and by declines in the levels of consumer complaints. *Comment:* A commenter stated that HUD could reduce its cost estimates for regulation and enforcement of installation programs in each of the 15 states that do not have their own approved program by partnering with the industry. Specifically, the commenter recommended that HUD partner with the Manufactured Housing Educational Institute which has an effective training program that has been used since 2006 in over 15 states for installers. The commenter also recommended that HUD consider collecting license and inspection fees from installers as an alternative to label fees for activities related to administering installation programs in the 15 default states. *Response:* HUD is currently planning to contract with qualified entities to perform this function and will be looking to use resources currently in place. HUD will also examine the viability of collecting license and inspection fees from installers in the future. *Comment:* A commenter stated that HUD's expansion of in-plant monitoring from contractor scrutiny of the home to assess the IPIA to contractor inspections and analyses of the manufacturer's quality assurance systems should have been first considered by the MHCC for prior review and comment and should be eliminated. *Response:* HUD's emphasis over the past years on examining the quality assurance programs of the manufacturers and the third party agencies inspection of these programs is consistent with the Program's overall monitoring policies and the Program's regulations. The purpose of this education and monitoring approach has been to assure compliance with the Federal standards and to reduce consumer complaints. HUD does not believe that it requires prior review by the MHCC to implement current modified monitoring procedures which are part of HUD's responsibilities under the Act. *Comment:* The commenter, citing data from HUD's Congressional Budget Justifications since 2005, stated that payments to SAAs have decreased. According to the commenter, with a substantial number of states facing critical difficulties providing funding for SAA operations, it is essential that additional HUD funding of SAAs be provided. The commenter recommended that any additional program revenues resulting from HUD's proposed fee increase be utilized to increase payments to the SAAs, and thereby preserve the federal-state partnership that is the bedrock of the manufactured housing program. *Response:* SAA funding has not decreased. In fact, SAAs that were fully approved as of December 27, 2000, receive funding at the same production levels and siting as in 2000. HUD will consider future modifications to the current fee distribution formula to ensure states are provided with adequate funding to perform the required SAA functions. *Commen* t: The second commenter also stated that it has serious concerns that the fees paid to SAAs are not reflective of current production and shipment levels and that HUD should adjust its budget and consider a fee increase based on more realistic payments to SAAs. The commenter also stated that a flaw in the federal law mandates that fees be based on shipment and production levels in effect in the year 2000 but that production and shipments levels have declined significantly during the last 14 years. Some states have increased production and shipments since 2000 yet they continue to receive payments based on lower production levels in 2000. Most states, however, have shipments and production levels substantially lower than they were in 2000, yet these states continue to receive payments at the higher rate calculated according to production and shipments in 2000. *Response:* HUD will review the basis supporting the amount of fees paid to SAAs and the adequacy of funding to the approved SAAs. *Comment:* One commenter recommended that HUD consider withdrawing the proposed rule and develop a formula for establishing fees based on production. According to the commenter, the fee could be raised or lowered depending on the annual number of homes produced, perhaps over a two year cycle. *Response:* HUD does not have the legal authority to develop a formula to establish fees based on production. As already noted, the Act provides that the amount of the fee may only be modified “as specifically authorized in advance of an annual appropriation” and is tied, therefore to annual appropriations. As also discussed, the establishment of an appropriate fee also needs to take into consideration several factors, including but not limited to production levels, such as ongoing program operating expenses. HUD is moving forward with this rule since the fee increase is required for HUD to carry out the Program's basic responsibilities under the Act. *Comment:* Both commenters objected to a comment made in HUD's FY 2015 Congressional Justification that it is seeking authority to allow future fee modification to be implemented via notice, rather than rulemaking. One commenter stated that such authority would further erode the goal of the Manufactured Housing Improvement Act of 2000 to ensure accountability and transparency in the fee adjustment process, including a full opportunity for all stakeholders to participate in that process through the informal rulemaking requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act. The commenter also stated that the history of HUD's modifications to the program fee, and specifically the fact that HUD has not changed the fee since 2002, does not support the basis HUD identifies for such a provision; specifically, the need for HUD to make timely adjustments to the fee. The second commenter stated it is essential for the MHCC to review and comment on future fee increases and that it believes that HUD has the ability to expedite rulemaking if needed. Both commenters recommended that HUD discontinue efforts to seek this authority. *Response:* HUD appreciates the opportunity to clarify its position regarding seeking authority to modify the fee by notice. Based on the comments received, HUD has not decided whether to pursue efforts to seek the legal authority to modify the manufactured housing program fee by notice. Nevertheless, should HUD pursue such authority it has been and continues to be HUD's position that modifying the fee would require publishing a notice in the **Federal Register** announcing the proposed fee and providing a 30-day public comment period for the purpose of inviting comment. After consideration of the public comments received on the proposal, HUD would publish a final notice in the **Federal Register** announcing the modified fee, any other necessary information regarding payment of the fee, and provide at least a 30-day delayed effective date. In addition, prior to implementing this change, HUD would be required to publish a final rule revising § 3284.5 to accommodate the authority to revise the fee by notice. HUD notes that such a procedure could be used to both increase and decrease the fee. Nevertheless, HUD believes that such a procedure is consistent with section 620 of the Act and, notwithstanding the description in HUD's Congressional Justification, is rulemaking under section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553). As stated, however, HUD has not decided whether to pursue this authority. III. This Final Rule This final rule raises the amount of the fee to $100 per transportable unit. When HUD last modified the amount of the fee per transportable section in 2002 (67 FR 52832, August 13, 2002), HUD divided the annual projected number of manufactured housing transportable units (350,000) into the amount appropriated by Congress for the manufactured housing program for the fiscal year. (See 67 FR at 52832.) As described in the May 2, 2014, proposed rule, HUD believes that a similar formula should form the basis of this revised fee. This approach is also consistent with the method and formula used to determine the monitoring inspection fee in § 3282.307(e). In this regard, HUD has determined, based on the current projected production levels, that the number of manufactured housing transportable units will be approximately 100,000 sections. This is the average of the range of production levels discussed in the proposed rule. Additionally, as stated in HUD's 2015 budget justification, HUD has estimated that, at current production levels, approximately $10 million annually is required to administer the Manufactured Housing Program in a manner that fulfills HUD's statutory oversight responsibilities. This is consistent with HUD's budget requests for FY 2015 which stated that HUD would through rulemaking increase the fee to an amount of up to $100 per label. HUD recognizes that the Federal government is nearly through FY 2014, and that application of a new fee may only apply to a limited portion of FY 2014, or may not be feasible until FY 2015. Nevertheless, the fee is important to sustain the program. The increase in fee implemented in this rule is one that HUD believes is appropriate for succeeding fiscal years barring subsequent appropriations that require further changes. IV. Findings and Certifications Impact on Small Entities The Regulatory Flexibility Act

(RFA)(5 U.S.C. 601 *et seq.* ) generally requires an agency to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements, unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. As discussed in the May 2, 2014, proposed rule, this final rule would not have a total economic impact of more than $6.1 million, which the maximum additional amount of fees that HUD has determined would be collected if the fee is raised to $100 per label. By annual appropriations acts, Congress requires HUD to collect fees from manufacturers of manufactured housing to ensure the annual appropriation that HUD provides in a given fiscal year. In addition to the authority to set label fees, the reports accompanying HUD's recent annual appropriations acts reflect strong Congressional encouragement for HUD to respond to the annual appropriations act authority to modify the label fees to obtain additional funding to support the manufactured housing program. The per-unit fee would remain as has always been the case to be proportional in its impact, with greater collections from larger manufacturers and less collections from smaller manufacturers. HUD has concluded, generally, that, as is often the case with increased fees placed on manufacturers of products used by consumers, the fee increase will be passed through to consumers, thereby minimizing the impact on manufacturers large and small. If the cost of the fee is passed on to the consumer, the purchase price of a manufactured home would increase, and placements of new manufactured homes would decrease slightly below currently forecasted levels. If manufacturers absorb the cost, however, the effect of the increase would result in lower profits for the manufacturers and sales would remain unchanged. In either scenario, this change in fee collections would represent a transfer to tax payers from manufacturers of manufactured housing or consumers purchasing new manufactured housing, since the increased fee collections will replace funds collected through federal tax collections. For these reasons, HUD submits that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)

(UMRA)establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the effects of their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal governments and the private sector. This final rule does not impose any Federal mandates on any State, local, or tribal governments or the private sector within the meaning of the UMRA. Environmental Impact This final rule involves a rate or cost determination and a related fiscal requirement that do not constitute a development decision affecting the physical condition of specific project areas or building sites. Accordingly, under 24 CFR 50.19(c)(6), this final rule is categorically excluded from environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321). Federalism Impact Executive Order 13132 (entitled “Federalism”) prohibits, to the extent practicable and permitted by law, an agency from promulgating a regulation that has federalism implications and either imposes substantial direct compliance costs on State and local governments and is not required by statute, or preempts State law, unless the relevant requirements of section 6 of the Executive Order are met. This rule does not have federalism implications and does not impose substantial direct compliance costs on State and local governments or preempt State law within the meaning of the Executive Order. List of Subjects in 24 CFR Part 3284 Consumer protection, Manufactured homes. Accordingly, for the reasons discussed in this preamble, HUD amends 24 CFR part 3284 as follows: PART 3284—MANUFACTURED HOUSING PROGRAM FEE 1. The authority citation for 24 CFR part 3284 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 3535(d), 5419, and 5424. 2. Revise § 3284.5 to read as follows: § 3284.5 Amount of fee. Each manufacturer, as defined in § 3282.7 of this chapter, must pay a fee of $100 per transportable section of each manufactured housing unit that it manufactures under the requirements of part 3280 of this chapter. Dated: August 8, 2014. Carol J. Galante, Assistant Secretary for Housing—Federal Housing Commissioner. [FR Doc. 2014-19173 Filed 8-12-14; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 9

Traces to 9 documents

U.S. Code