Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2014-08-05 · SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION · Notices

Notices. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

777 words·~4 min read·/register/2014/08/05/2014-18378·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-72703; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2014-04] Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Designation of Longer Period for Commission Action on Proceedings To Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, To Amend NYSE Arca, Inc.'s Rules by Revising the Order of Priority of Bids and Offers When Executing Orders in Open Outcry July 29, 2014. On January 15, 2014, NYSE Arca, Inc.
(“Exchange” or “NYSE Arca”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) 1 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, 2 a proposed rule change to revise the order of priority of bids and offers when executing orders in open outcry. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the **Federal Register** on February 3, 2014. 3 On March 18, 2014, the Commission extended to May 2, 2014 the period in which to approve, disapprove, or institute proceedings to determine whether to disapprove the proposed rule change. 4 The Commission received ten comment letters from seven commenters regarding the proposal, 5 as well as a response to the comment letters from NYSE Arca. 6 On April 29, 2014, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change. 7 On May 2, 2014, the Commission noticed Amendment No. 1 and instituted proceedings to determine whether to approve or disapprove the proposed rule change under Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act 8 in an order published in the **Federal Register** on May 8, 2014. 9 The Commission thereafter received no comment letters on the proposal, as modified by Amendment No. 1.
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 10 provides that, after initiating disapproval proceedings, the Commission shall issue an order approving or disapproving the proposed rule change not later than 180 days after the **Federal Register** publishes notice of the proposed rule change. The Commission may extend the period for issuing an order approving or disapproving the proposed rule change by not more than 60 days if the Commission determines that a longer period is appropriate and publishes the reasons for such determination.
The proposed rule change was published for notice and comment in the **Federal Register** on February 3, 2014. August 2, 2014 is 180 days from that date, and October 1, 2014 is an additional 60 days from that date. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b-4. 3 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 71425 (January 28, 2014), 79 FR 6258 (“Notice”). 4 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 71733 (March 18, 2014), 79 FR 16072 (March 24, 2014). 5 *See* Letter from Darren Story, dated January 29, 2014;
Letter from Abraham Kohen, AK FE Consultants LLC, dated January 31, 2014; Letter from David Spack, Chief Compliance Officer, Casey Securities, LLC, dated February 3, 2014; Letter from Abraham Kohen, AK FE Consultants LLC, dated February 4, 2014; Letter from Angel Alvira, dated February 12, 2014; Letter from Donald Hart, dated February 12, 2014; Letter from Doug Patterson, Chief Compliance Officer, Cutler Group, LP, dated February 13, 2014; Letter from Donald Hart, dated February 18, 2014;
Letter from Gerald D. O'Connell, Chief Regulatory Officer, Susquehanna International Group, LLP, dated March 14, 2014; and Letter from Darren Story, dated March 21, 2014. The comment letters are available in the public comment file for SR-NYSEArca-2014-04 at *http://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nysearca-2014-04/nysearca201404.shtml* . 6 *See* Letter from Martha Redding, Chief Counsel, NYSE Euronext, dated April 4, 2014 (“NYSE Response Letter”). The NYSE Response Letter is available at *http://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nysearca-2014-04/nysearca201404.shtml* . 7 Amendment No. 1 is available in the public comment file for SR-NYSEArca-2014-04 at *http://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nysearca-2014-04/nysearca201404.shtml* . 8 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B). 9 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 72081 (May 2, 2014) 79 FR 26474 (“Order Instituting Proceedings”). 10 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
The Commission finds it appropriate to designate a longer period within which to issue an order approving or disapproving the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, so that the Commission has sufficient time to consider the proposed rule change, the issues raised in the comment letters that have been submitted in connection with this proposed rule change, and NYSE Arca's response to these issues in its response letter. Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, 11 designates October 1, 2014, as the date by which the Commission must either approve or disapprove the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1 (File Number SR-NYSEArca-2014-04). 11 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority. 12 12 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(57). Kevin M. O'Neill, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2014-18378 Filed 8-4-14; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 2
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 17 CFR 240.19
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Cite17 CFR 240.19
Cites 3Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.