Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2014-03-20 · Food and Drug Administration, HHS · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Final rule

470 words·~2 min read·/register/2014/03/20/2014-05882·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Food and Drug Administration, HHS
Action: Final rule
Citation: FR Doc. 2014-05882 · Docket No. FDA-2014-N-0002 · 21 CFR 558

Summary

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending the animal drug regulations to reflect the withdrawal of approval of a new animal drug application (NADA) and two abbreviated new animal drug applications (ANADAs) for three-way, fixed-ratio combination drug Type A medicated articles containing chlortetracycline, sulfathiazole, and penicillin. This action is being taken at the sponsor's request because these products are no longer manufactured or marketed.

Dates

This rule is effective March 31, 2014.

Supplementary Information

Zoetis Inc., 333 Portage St., Kalamazoo, MI 49007 has requested that FDA withdraw approval of the following NADA and two ANADAs because the products are no longer manufactured or marketed: NADA/ANADA Proprietary name 039-077 CSP 250 (chlortetracycline, sulfathiazole, and penicillin) Type A medicated article. 200-140 AUREOZOL (chlortetracycline, sulfathiazole, and penicillin) Type A medicated article. 200-167 AUREOZOL 500 Granular (chlortetracycline, sulfathiazole, and penicillin) Type A medicated article. The NADAs listed were identified as being affected by guidance for industry (GFI) #213, “New Animal Drugs and New Animal Drug Combination Products Administered in or on Medicated Feed or Drinking Water of Food-Producing Animals: Recommendations for Drug Sponsors for Voluntarily Aligning Product Use Conditions with GFI #209”, December 2013. Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register , FDA gave notice that approval of NADA 039-077, ANADA 200-140, and ANADA 200-167, and all supplements and amendments thereto, is withdrawn, effective March 31, 2014. As provided in the regulatory text of this document, the animal drug regulations are amended to reflect these voluntary withdrawals of approval. This rule does not meet the definition of “rule” in 5 U.S.C. 804(3)(A) because it is a rule of “particular applicability.” Therefore, it is not subject to the congressional review requirements in 5 U.S.C. 801-808. List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 558 Animal drugs, Animal feeds. Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs and redelegated to the Center for Veterinary Medicine, 21 CFR part 558 is amended as follows: PART 558—NEW ANIMAL DRUGS FOR USE IN ANIMAL FEEDS 1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 558 continues to read as follows: Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360b, 371. § 558.4 [Amended] 2. In § 558.4(d), in the “Category II” table, remove the entry for “Sulfathiazole” and its respective following entries. § 558.155 [Removed] 3. Remove § 558.155. Dated: March 12, 2014. Bernadette Dunham, Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine. [FR Doc. 2014-05882 Filed 3-19-14; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 2
2 references not yet in our index
  • 21 CFR 558
  • 5 USC 801-808
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Final rule
Cite21 CFR 558
Cite5 USC 801-808
Cites 4Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.