Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2014-02-06 · SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION · Notices

Notices. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

718 words·~3 min read·/register/2014/02/06/2014-02501·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-71455; File No. SR-NSCC-2013-13] Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Securities Clearing Corporation; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change To Discontinue Its Stock Borrow Program January 31, 2014. I. Introduction On December 10, 2013, the National Securities Clearing Corporation (“NSCC”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) the proposed rule change SR-NSCC-2013-13 pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) 1 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder. 2 The proposed rule change was published for comment in the **Federal Register** on December 27, 2013. 3 The Commission did not receive comments on the proposed rule change.
This order approves the proposed rule change. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b-4. 3 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-71156 (Dec. 20, 2013), 78 FR 79028 (Dec. 27, 2013) (SR-NSCC-2013-13). II. Description of the Proposal NSCC is amending its Rules and Procedures (“Rules”) to discontinue its Stock Borrow Program. The effective date of the rule change will be announced by NSCC via an Important Notice. Currently, NSCC Members may elect to participate in the Stock Borrow Program by designating specific securities from their inventory at the Depository Trust Company (“DTC”) as available to be lent in the event that NSCC's Continuous Net Settlement (“CNS”) system cannot complete a delivery of a security to a long Member because a short Member has not completed its delivery to CNS.
In such a case, if a lender has identified such a security as available through the Stock Borrow Program and the lender has a free excess position of the security at DTC, NSCC initiates deliveries through CNS to the long Member and sets up a pending receive for the lending Member. If the position is not returned to the lender by the end of the settlement day, i.e., the Member with the original obligation to deliver to CNS does not complete that delivery, the lender receives full market value for the securities through NSCC settlement.
Usage of NSCC's Stock Borrow Program has declined over the past few years. In 2007, NSCC borrowed a daily average of approximately $1.85 billion in market value at the close of each day from the approximately 21 Members that participated in the Stock Borrow Program. In October 2013, only three Members participated in the Stock Borrow Program and the average daily value borrowed at the close of day during that month was approximately $81 million. Usage of the program has continued to drop since the end of October 2013.
Given the reduction in the use of the program, NSCC has determined that it is not economically efficient to maintain the service. III. Discussion and Commission Finding Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act 4 directs the Commission to approve a proposed rule change of a self-regulatory organization if it finds that such proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and rules and regulations thereunder applicable to such organization. Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act 5 requires that the rules of a clearing agency be designed to, among other things, “promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions and . . . to assure the safeguarding of securities and funds which are in the custody or control of the clearing agency or for which it is responsible.” 6 The Commission finds that NSCC's proposed rule change is consistent with these requirements because discontinuing an underutilized service will enable NSCC to allocate its resources to core clearing agency functions in a more efficient and effective manner. 4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C). 5 12 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F). 6 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
IV. Conclusion On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Act and in particular with the requirements of Section 17A of the Act 7 and the rules and regulations thereunder. 7 In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. *See* 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). *It is therefore ordered,* pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, that the proposed rule change SR-NSCC-2013-13 be, and it hereby is, *approved.* For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority. 8 8 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
Kevin M. O'Neill, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2014-02501 Filed 2-5-14; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 4
2 references not yet in our index
  • 17 CFR 240.19
  • 12 USC 78q-1(b)(3)(F)
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Cite17 CFR 240.19
Cite12 USC 78q-1(b)(3)(F)
Cites 6Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.