Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2014-01-21 · Nuclear Regulatory Commission · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Petition for rulemaking; supplement

1,083 words·~5 min read·/register/2014/01/21/2014-01035·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Action: Petition for rulemaking; supplement
Citation: 79 FR (No. 13) · FR Doc. 2014-01035 · Docket No. PRM-50-107; NRC-2013-0077 · 10 CFR 30, 40, 50, 52, 60, 61, 63, 70, 71, 72

Summary

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has received a supplement to a petition for rulemaking (PRM) previously filed with the NRC by Mr. James Lieberman (the petitioner) (PRM-50-107). The petitioner originally requested that the NRC expand its regulatory framework for nuclear power reactors to make it a legal obligation for those non-licensees who seek NRC regulatory approvals to be held to the same legal standards for the submittal of complete and accurate information as would a licensee or an applicant for a license. The petitioner requests that the scope of his petition be expanded to encompass the NRC's regulations for radioactive materials, waste disposal, transportation, and spent fuel storage licensees. The NRC requests public comments on the supplement to the petition.

Dates

Submit comments on the supplemental information by April 7, 2014. Comments received after this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the NRC is able to assure consideration only for comments received on or before this date.

Supplementary Information

I. Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments A. Obtaining Information Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2013-0077 when contacting the NRC about the availability of information for this petition. You may access publicly available information related to this petition by any of the following methods: • Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to and search for Docket ID NRC-2013-0077. • NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): You may access publicly available documents online in the NRC Library at . To begin the search, select “ ADAMS Public Documents ” and then select “ Begin Web-based ADAMS Search. ” For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to . The ADAMS accession number for each document referenced in this document (if that document is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time that a document is referenced. • NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. B. Submitting Comments Please include Docket ID NRC-2013-0077 in the subject line of your comment submission, in order to ensure that the NRC is able to make your comment submission available to the public in this docket. The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact information that you do not want to be publicly disclosed in your comment submission. The NRC will post all comment submissions at as well as enter the comment submissions into ADAMS. The NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove identifying or contact information. If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be publicly disclosed in their comment submission. Your request should state that the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove such information before making the comment submissions available to the public or entering the comment submissions into ADAMS. II. Background In a petition for rulemaking dated April 15, 2013 (ADMAS Accession No. ML13113A443), the petitioner requested that the NRC expand its “regulatory framework to make it a legal obligation for those non-licensees who seek NRC regulatory approvals to be held to the same legal standards for the submittal of complete and accurate information as would a licensee or an applicant for a license.” The original submittal addressed part 50 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), “Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities,” and 10 CFR part 52, “Licenses, Certifications, and Approvals for Nuclear Power Plants.” On June 10, 2013 (78 FR 34604), the NRC published a notice in the Federal Register requesting public comments on the petitioner's original submittal. The comment period closed on August 26, 2013. On September 16, 2013 (ADAMS Accession No. ML13261A190), the petitioner submitted a supplement that expanded the scope of his petition to address 10 CFR part 30, “Rules of General Applicability to Domestic Licensing of Byproduct Material;” 10 CFR part 40, “Domestic Licensing of Source Material;” 10 CFR part 60, “Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Wastes in Geological Repositories;” 10 CFR part 61, “Licensing Requirements for Land Disposal of Radioactive Waste;” 10 CFR part 63, “Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Waste in A Geologic Repository At Yucca Mountain, Nevada;” 10 CFR part 70, “Domestic Licensing of Special Nuclear Material;” 10 CFR part 71, “Packaging and Transportation of Radioactive Material;” and 10 CFR part 72, “Licensing Requirements for the Independent Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level Radioactive Waste, and Reactor-Related Greater Than Class C Waste.” III. Request for Comment The full text of the original petition and the supplement are available at by searching on Docket ID NRC-2013-0077 and in ADAMS under Accession Nos. ML13113A443 and ML13261A190, respectively. The NRC requests public comments on the supplement to the petition. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 10th day of January 2014. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Annette Vietti-Cook, Secretary of the Commission. [FR Doc. 2014-01035 Filed 1-17-14; 8:45 am]

Connections9 off-index
9 references not yet in our index
  • 10 CFR 52
  • 10 CFR 30
  • 10 CFR 40
  • 10 CFR 60
  • 10 CFR 61
  • 10 CFR 63
  • 10 CFR 70
  • 10 CFR 71
  • 10 CFR 72
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Petition for rulemaking; supplement
Cite10 CFR 52
Cite10 CFR 30
Cite10 CFR 40
Cite10 CFR 60
Cite10 CFR 61
Cites 9 · showing 5Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.