Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2013-02-15 · Postal Regulatory Commission · Notices

Notices. Notice

726 words·~3 min read·/register/2013/02/15/2013-03505

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 7533-01-P POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. CP2013-49; Order No. 1654] International Mail Contract AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a recent Postal Service filing concerning an additional Global Reseller Expedited Package Contract 1 Negotiated Service Agreement. This notice informs the public of the filing, invites public comment, and takes other administrative steps. DATES: *Comments are due:* February 19, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments electronically via the Commission's Filing Online system at *http://www.prc.gov.* Those who cannot submit comments electronically should contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section by telephone for advice on filing alternatives. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, at 202-789-6820. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Contents of Filing III. Notice of Proceeding IV.
Ordering Paragraphs I. Introduction *Background.* On February 8, 2013, the Postal Service filed a notice pursuant to 39 CFR 3015.5 announcing that it has entered into an additional Global Reseller Expedited Package Contracts 1 negotiated service agreement (Agreement). 1 It seeks to have the Agreement included within the existing Global Reseller Expedited Package Contracts 1 product on grounds of functional equivalence to the baseline agreement filed in Docket No. CP2010-36. 2 *Id.* at 2-3. 1 Notice of United States Postal Service of Filing a Functionally Equivalent Global Reseller Expedited Package Negotiated Service Agreement and Application For Non-Public Treatment of Materials Filed Under Seal, February 8, 2013 (Notice). 2 *See also* Docket No.
MC2010-21 (based on Governors' Decision No. 10-1), Order No. 445, April 22, 2010, Order Concerning Global Reseller Expedited Package Contracts Negotiated Service Agreement. II. Contents of Filings *Agreement.* The Postal Service asserts that the Agreement is functionally equivalent to the baseline agreement approved in Docket No. CP2010-36. *Id.* at 2-3. The Postal Service filed the following material in conjunction with its Notice, along with public (redacted) versions of supporting financial information: • Attachment 1—a redacted copy of the Agreement; • Attachment 2—a certified statement required by 39 CFR 3015.5(c)(2); • Attachment 3—a redacted copy of Governors' Decision No. 10-1; and • Attachment 4—an application for non-public treatment of materials filed under seal. *Functional equivalency.* The Postal Service asserts that the Agreement is substantially similar to the baseline agreement filed in Docket No.
CP2010-36 because it shares similar cost and market characteristics and meets criteria in Governors' Decision No. 10-1 concerning attributable costs. *Id.* at 3. The Postal Service further asserts that the functional terms of the Agreement and the baseline agreement are the same and the benefits are comparable. *Id.* at 3-4. It states that prices offered under the Agreement may differ due to postage commitments and when the Agreement is signed (due to updated costing information), but asserts that these differences do not alter the functional equivalency of the Agreement and the baseline agreement. *Id.* at 4.
The Postal Service also identifies differences between the terms of the two agreements, but asserts that these differences do not affect the fundamental service being offered or the fundamental structure of the Agreement. 3 *Id.* at 4-7. 3 Differences include a new “Whereas” paragraph, numerous revisions to existing Articles, and five new Articles. *Id.* III. Notice of Proceeding The Commission establishes Docket No. CP2013-49 for consideration of matters raised by the Postal Service's Notice.
Interested persons may submit comments on whether the Agreement is consistent with the requirements of 39 CFR 3015.5 and the policies of 39 U.S.C. 3632 and 3633. Comments are due no later than February 19, 2013. The public portions of this filing can be accessed via the Commission's Web site, *http://www.prc.gov.* Information on how to obtain access to material filed under seal appears in 39 CFR 3007.50. The Commission appoints Curtis E. Kidd to serve as Public Representative in the captioned proceeding.
IV. Ordering Paragraphs *It is ordered:* 1. The Commission establishes Docket No. CP2013-49 for consideration of matters raised by the Postal Service's Notice. 2. Comments by interested persons in this proceeding are due no later than February 19, 2013. 3. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Curtis E. Kidd is appointed to serve as an officer of the Commission (Public Representative) to represent the interests of the general public in this proceeding. 4. The Secretary shall arrange for publication of this order in the **Federal Register** .
By the Commission. Shoshana M. Grove, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2013-03505 Filed 2-14-13; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 2
3 references not yet in our index
  • 39 CFR 3015.5
  • 39 CFR 3015.5(c)(2)
  • 39 CFR 3007.50
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Notice
Cite39 CFR 3015.5
Cite39 CFR 3015.5(c)(2)
Cite39 CFR 3007.50
Cites 5Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.