Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2012-11-23 · Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT · Notices

Notices. Notice; correction

407 words·~2 min read·/register/2012/11/23/2012-28409

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4910-22-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Highway Administration Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions on Proposed Highway in California AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT. ACTION: Notice; correction. SUMMARY: This notice corrects an error in the FHWA notice published on October 10, 2012, at 77 FR 61654. That notice provided an incorrect reference to a statute of limitations timeframe, and an incorrect date. DATES: This notice is effective November 23, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Manuel E. Sánchez, Senior Transportation Engineer/Border Engineer, Federal Highway Administration—California Division, 401 B Street, Suite 800, San Diego, CA 92101, Regular Office Hours: 6:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Telephone:
(619)699- 7336, Email: *manuel.sanchez@dot.gov,* or Bruce L. April, Deputy District Director—Environmental, Caltrans District 11, 4050 Taylor Street, MS 242, San Diego, CA 92110, Regular Office Hours: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Telephone:
(619)688-0100, Email: *Bruce* _ *April@dot.ca.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 10, 2012, at 77 FR 61654, the FHWA published a notice regarding actions taken by the FHWA and other Federal agencies that are final within the meaning of 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). The actions relate to the proposed State Route 11 and Otay Mesa East Land Port of Entry project in the City and County of San Diego, State of California. The original notice indicated that claims seeking judicial review of the Federal agency actions on the highway project will be barred unless the claim is filed on or before April 8, 2013, which represents 180 days after publication in the **Federal Register** . However, the recently enacted “Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act” (MAP-21) (Sec. 1308, Pub. L. 112-141, 126 STAT. 405), amended 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1) as of October 1, 2012, to provide that any claim seeking judicial review of the Federal agency actions on a highway project is barred unless the claim is filed 150 days after publication of a notice in the **Federal Register** . As such, any claim seeking judicial review of the above referenced highway project will be barred unless the claim is filed on or before March 9, 2013. Also, if the Federal law that authorizes judicial review of a claim provides a time period of less than 150 days for filing such a claim, then that shorter time period still applies. Authority: 23 U.S.C. 139(l); Sec. 1308, Pub. L. 112-141, 126 Stat. 405. Vincent P. Mammano, Division Administrator, Federal Highway Administration, Sacramento, California. [FR Doc. 2012-28409 Filed 11-21-12; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 1
2 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 112-141
  • 126 Stat. 405
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Notice; correction
Pub. L.Pub. L. 112-141
Stat.126 Stat. 405
Cites 3Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.