Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2012-09-05 · Social Security Administration · Notices

Notices. Notice of Social Security Acquiescence Ruling; Correction

158 words·~1 min read·/register/2012/09/05/2012-21799·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION [Docket No. SSA-2012-0046] Social Security Acquiescence Ruling
(AR)12-1(8); Correction; Petersen v. Astrue, 633 F.3d 633 (8th Cir. 2011): Whether a National Guard Technician Who Worked in Noncovered Employment is Exempt From the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP)—Title II of the Social Security Act AGENCY: Social Security Administration. ACTION: Notice of Social Security Acquiescence Ruling; Correction. SUMMARY: The Social Security Administration published a document in the **Federal Register** of August 27, 2012, in FR Doc. 2012-21065, in the first column, correct the “title” to read: Social Security Acquiescence Ruling
(AR)12-1(8); Petersen v. Astrue, 633 F.3d 633 (8th Cir. 2011); Whether a National Guard Technician Who Worked in Noncovered Employment is Exempt From the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP)—Title II of the Social Security Act. Also, in the second column, correct the heading to read: *Acquiescence Ruling 12-1(8)* Paul Kryglik, Director, Office of Regulations, Social Security Administration. [FR Doc. 2012-21799 Filed 9-4-12; 8:45 am]
Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 633 F.3d 633
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Notice of Social Security Acquiescence Ruling; Correction
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.