Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2012-08-28 · Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Proposed policy; implementation of Section 136; opportunity to comment; correction and extension of time to comment

397 words·~2 min read·/register/2012/08/28/2012-21147

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Chapter 1 [Docket No. FAA-2012-0754] Airport Improvement Program (AIP): Policy Regarding Access to Airports From Residential Property; Correction AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Proposed policy; implementation of Section 136; opportunity to comment; correction and extension of time to comment. SUMMARY: The FAA is correcting an inadvertent omission in the Addresses paragraph in the Proposed Policy Regarding Access to Airports From Residential Property that was published in the **Federal Register** on July 30, 2012.
The FAA is also extending the comment period to September 14, 2012. DATES: The comment period for the proposed policy document published July 30, 2012 (77 FR 44515), is extended to September 14, 2012. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randall S. Fiertz, telephone:
(202)267-3085; facsimile:
(202)267-5257; email: *randall.fiertz@faa.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Need for Correction On July 30, 2012, the Federal Aviation Administration published a Notice of Proposed Policy in the **Federal Register** at 77 FR 44515 proposing an FAA policy, based on Federal law, concerning through-the-fence access to a federally obligated airport from an adjacent or nearby property, when that property is used as a residence. The Notice also proposed to limit application of the FAA's previously published interim policy (76 FR 15028; March 18, 2011) to commercial service airports that certified existing residential through-the-fence access agreements and rescind applicability of this interim policy with regard to certain general aviation airports consistent with section 136 of Public Law 112-95. In addition, that notice described how the FAA will interpret provisions of the law pertaining to residential through-the-fence access and invited comments. There was an inadvertent omission in the Notice which FAA is correcting through this amendment. In the Addresses paragraph, the FAA inadvertently omitted the applicable Department of Transportation Docket Number. Correction In the document published on July 30, 2012 (77 FR 44515) FR Doc. 2010-18058, on page 44515 in column 3, under the heading ADDRESSES paragraph of this document, replace “Docket Number FAA-2012-XXX” with “Docket Number FAA-2012-0754”. Extension of Time To Comment The Experimental Aircraft Association requested the FAA extend the comment period an additional two weeks. The FAA believes this is a reasonable request and hereby extends the comment period to September 14, 2012. Dated: Issued in Washington, DC, on August 22, 2012. Randall S. Fiertz, Director, Airport Compliance and Management Analysis. [FR Doc. 2012-21147 Filed 8-27-12; 8:45 am]
Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 112-95
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Proposed policy; implementation of Section 136; opportunity to comment; correction and extension of time to comment
Pub. L.Pub. L. 112-95
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.