Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2012-07-26 · Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Notice

599 words·~3 min read·/register/2012/07/26/2012-18223·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA
Action: Notice
Citation: 77 FR (No. 144) · FR Doc. 2012-18223 · Docket No. APHIS-2006-0035

Summary

We are advising the public of our record of decision for the final supplemental environmental impact statement for the Gull Hazard Reduction Program at John F. Kennedy International Airport.

Dates

Effective Date: July 26, 2012.

Supplementary Information

Background On April 3, 2006, the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) published a notice in the Federal Register (71 FR 16547-16548, Docket No. APHIS-2006-0035) announcing APHIS' intent to prepare a supplemental environmental impact statement (EIS) to address wildlife hazards to aircraft resulting from changes in wildlife populations and land uses in and around the John F. Kennedy International Airport. This action is a supplement to the Gull Hazard Reduction Program at John F. Kennedy International Airport Final EIS, May 1994. The supplemental EIS has been prepared in cooperation with the Department of Interior's Fish and Wildlife Service and National Park Service, the Federal Aviation Administration, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, the New York City Department of Parks and Recreation, the New York City Department of Environmental Protection, and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. A notice of availability regarding the draft supplemental EIS was published by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the Federal Register on January 14, 2011 (76 FR 2680, Docket No. ER-FRL-8994-6), and a notice of availability regarding the final supplemental EIS was published by EPA in the Federal Register on May 11, 2012 (77 FR 27771, Docket No. ER-FRL-9002-9). The NEPA implementing regulations in 40 CFR 1506.10 require a minimum 30-day waiting period between the time a final EIS is published and the time an agency makes a decision on an action covered by the EIS. APHIS has reviewed the final supplemental EIS and comments received during the 30-day waiting period and has concluded that it has fully analyzed the issues covered by the draft supplemental EIS and those comments and suggestions submitted by commenters. Based on our final supplemental EIS, the response to public comments, and other pertinent scientific data, APHIS has prepared a record of decision. The record of decision has been prepared in accordance with: (1) The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq. ); (2) regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality for implementing the procedural provisions of NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500-1508); (3) USDA regulations implementing NEPA (7 CFR part 1b); and (4) APHIS' NEPA Implementing Procedures (7 CFR part 372). Done in Washington, DC, this 20th day of July 2012. Kevin Shea, Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. [FR Doc. 2012-18223 Filed 7-25-12; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
3 references not yet in our index
  • 40 CFR 1506.10
  • 7 CFR 1
  • 7 CFR 372
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Notice
Cite40 CFR 1506.10
Cite7 CFR 1
Cite7 CFR 372
Cites 4Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.