Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2012-07-10 · Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Approval of an information collection; comment request

983 words·~4 min read·/register/2012/07/10/2012-16798·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA
Action: Approval of an information collection; comment request
Citation: 77 FR (No. 132) · FR Doc. 2012-16798 · Docket No. APHIS-2012-0050

Summary

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this notice announces the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service's (APHIS) intention to request an approval of an information collection associated with the APHIS Asian longhorned beetle eradication program.

Dates

We will consider all comments that we receive on or before September 10, 2012.

Supplementary Information

Title: Asian Longhorned Beetle Consumer Research Survey. OMB Number: 0579-XXXX. Type of Request: Approval of an information collection. Abstract: The APHIS Asian longhorned beetle (ALB) Cooperative Eradication Program is responsible for protecting the United States' hardwood forests and parklands, as well as urban and suburban trees, from ALB infestation. The program works towards halting the spread of this devastating pest and preventing it from becoming established. Through survey, control, regulatory compliance measures, and public education, the ALB program protects trees on private property, in parks, and along streets. The program also protects tree-dependent industries such as timber, maple syrup, nurseries, and tourism. One of the most common ways the ALB can spread is by human transport. Of particular concern is firewood cut from personal or neighborhood trees and moved to areas that are not currently infested with ALB or other invasive insects or plant diseases. The vigilance of residents in and around ALB regulated areas looking for the beetle and signs of infestation and reporting any suspicions, along with their adherence to rules regarding the movement of firewood, remain crucial. It is also important that citizens allow program officials access to private property for survey and treatment activities. Citizens in areas not currently ALB infested should also be cognizant of the beetle and why firewood movement should be curtailed. The ALB Cooperative Eradication Program has been working to eradicate the ALB from the United States since 1996. Although steady progress has been made, areas remain vulnerable to ALB infestation as long as the beetle exists in the United States. Parts of Massachusetts, New Jersey, and New York are quarantined for ALB and the insect was recently detected in Ohio. People who live or work in or around ALB-affected and at-risk areas are critical to the United States Department of Agriculture's mission to stop the ALB. Alert community members have been the first to report every ALB infestation detected in the United States thus far. To stop the spread of this pest, the ALB Cooperative Eradication Program must retain the public's attention and would like to reach more people in different ways. This information collection activity will help APHIS determine if current public communication initiatives that support the eradication program are effectively communicating necessary information about the pest, the eradication program, and the steps the public can take to help prevent the spread of ALB. APHIS will use this information to revise ALB-specific public communication efforts to better align with public information needs. We are asking the Office of Management and Budget to approve our use of these information collection activities for 3 years. The purpose of this notice is to solicit comments from the public (as well as affected agencies) concerning our information collection. These comments will help us: (1) Evaluate whether the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) Evaluate the accuracy of our estimate of the burden of the collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, through use, as appropriate, of automated, electronic, mechanical, and other collection technologies; e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Estimate of burden: The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 0.25 hours per response. Respondents: Consumers 18 years of age or older living in target counties in Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, and Ohio. Estimated annual number of respondents: 1,000. Estimated annual number of responses per respondent: 1. Estimated annual number of responses: 1,000. Estimated total annual burden on respondents: 250 hours. (Due to averaging, the total annual burden hours may not equal the product of the annual number of responses multiplied by the reporting burden per response.) All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the request for OMB approval. All comments will also become a matter of public record. Done in Washington, DC, this 29th day of June 2012. Kevin Shea, Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. [FR Doc. 2012-16798 Filed 7-9-12; 8:45 am]

★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.