Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2012-06-18 · Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Withdrawal of notice of proposed rulemaking

551 words·~3 min read·/register/2012/06/18/2012-14788

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4310-02-P DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service 26 CFR Part 1 [REG-100276-97] RIN 1545-AU94 Financial Asset Securitization Investment Trusts AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. ACTION: Withdrawal of notice of proposed rulemaking. SUMMARY: This document withdraws a notice of proposed rulemaking relating to financial asset securitization trusts (FASITs). The FASIT provisions (sections 860H through 860L) of the Internal Revenue Code
(Code)were repealed by Public Law 108-357, effective January 1, 2005, with a limited exception for existing FASITs. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julanne Allen at
(202)622-3920 (not a toll-free number). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Section 1621(a) of the Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996, Public Law 104-188 (110 Stat. 1755 (1996)), amended the Code by adding part V (sections 860H through 860L) (the FASIT provisions) to subchapter M of chapter 1. Part V, which was effective September 1, 1997, authorized a securitization vehicle called a Financial Asset Securitization Investment Trust (FASIT). FASITs were meant to facilitate the securitization of debt instruments, such as credit card receivables, home equity loans, and auto loans. Proposed regulations providing guidance with respect to the application of the FASIT provisions were published in the **Federal Register** on February 7, 2000 (65 FR 5807). (Section 1.860E-1(c) of the proposed regulations, governing the transfer of non-economic REMIC residual interests, was finalized on July 18, 2002, in T.D. 9004.) In general, the proposed regulations pertaining to FASITs are proposed to be applicable on the date final regulations are filed with the **Federal Register** . The portion of the proposed regulations containing an anti-abuse rule and the portion of the proposed regulations implementing special transition rules for securitization entities in existence on August 31, 1997, were proposed to apply on February 4, 2000. The FASIT provisions were repealed by section 835(a) of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, Public Law 108-357 (118 Stat. 1418 (2004)), effective January 1, 2005. During the period of legislative consideration of the FASIT provisions and subsequently, other structures for loan securitizations were developed. In its discussion of the reasons for the repeal of the FASIT provisions, the Ways and Means Committee stated: The Committee is aware that FASITs are not being used widely in the manner envisioned by the Congress and, consequently, the FASIT rules have not served the purposes for which they originally were intended. Moreover, the Joint Committee staff's report [on its investigation of Enron Corporation and related entities] and other information indicate that FASITS are particularly prone to abuse and likely are being used to facilitate tax avoidance transactions. H.R. Rep. No. 108-548, Pt. 1, at 295
(2004)(footnote omitted). In light of the repeal of the FASIT provisions and their limited use, the Treasury Department and the IRS have decided to withdraw the proposed regulations. Drafting Information The principal authors of this withdrawal notice are Richard LaFalce and Julanne Allen of the Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions and Products). List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1 Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirement. Withdrawal of Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Accordingly, under the authority of 26 U.S.C. 7805, the notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-100276-97) published in the **Federal Register** on February 7, 2000 (65 FR 5807) is withdrawn. Steven T. Miller, Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement. [FR Doc. 2012-14788 Filed 6-15-12; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
6 references not yet in our index
  • 26 CFR 1
  • Pub. L. 108-357
  • Pub. L. 104-188
  • 110 Stat. 1755
  • T.D. 9004
  • 118 Stat. 1418
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Withdrawal of notice of proposed rulemaking
Cite26 CFR 1
Pub. L.Pub. L. 108-357
Pub. L.Pub. L. 104-188
Stat.110 Stat. 1755
Treas. Dec.T.D. 9004
Cites 7 · showing 6Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.