Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2012-03-26 · U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Withdrawal of notice of proposed rulemaking

457 words·~2 min read·/register/2012/03/26/2012-7223·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security
Action: Withdrawal of notice of proposed rulemaking
Citation: FR Doc. 2012-7223 · RIN 1651-AA80 · USCBP-2010-0038 · 19 CFR 111

Summary

This document withdraws a notice of proposed rulemaking, published in the Federal Register on October 27, 2010, that proposed amendments to the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) regulations that would allow brokers, upon the client's consent in a written authorization, to share client information with affiliated entities related to the broker so that these entities may offer non-customs business services to the broker's clients. Although the proposed rule was prepared in response to a request from a member of the broker community seeking to allow brokers to share clients' information for marketing purposes, there was opposition to the proposal from brokers due to the condition on sharing the information that CBP included in the document to protect importers' proprietary information. The notice is being withdrawn to permit further consideration of the relevant issues involved in the proposed rulemaking.

Dates

Effective March 26, 2012, the proposed rule published October 27, 2010, (75 FR 66050), is withdrawn.

Supplementary Information

Background On October 27, 2010, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) published a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register (75 FR 66050) pertaining to the obligations of customs brokers to keep clients' information confidential. The proposed amendment would allow brokers, upon the client's written consent, to share client information with affiliated entities related to the broker so that these entities may offer non-customs business services to the broker's clients. The proposed amendment would also allow customs brokers to use a third-party to perform photocopying, scanning, and delivery of client records for the broker. These proposed changes were intended to update the regulations to reflect modern business practices, while protecting the confidentiality of client (importer) information. The comment period ended on December 27, 2010. CBP received public comment on the proposed rulemaking. The majority of commenters expressed concern that the proposed rule did not serve the interests of the importing public. Specifically, there was opposition to the proposal from brokers due to the condition on sharing the information that CBP included in the document to protect importers' proprietary information. Withdrawal of Notice of Proposed Rulemaking CBP is withdrawing the notice published in the Federal Register (75 FR 66050) on October 27, 2010, pending further consideration of the relevant issues involved in the proposed rulemaking. Dated: March 21, 2012. David V. Aguilar, Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection. [FR Doc. 2012-7223 Filed 3-23-12; 8:45 am]

Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 19 CFR 111
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Withdrawal of notice of proposed rulemaking
Cite19 CFR 111
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.