Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2012-03-21 · Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Proposed rule; extension of comment period

539 words·~2 min read·/register/2012/03/21/2012-6799·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)
Action: Proposed rule; extension of comment period
Citation: FR Doc. 2012-6799 · RIN 3064-AD91 · 12 CFR 325

Summary

On January 23, 2012, the FDIC published in the Federal Register a notice of proposed rulemaking for public comment to implement the requirements in Section 165(i)(2) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) 1 by requiring state nonmember banks and state savings associations supervised by the Corporation with total consolidated assets of more than $10 billion to conduct annual stress tests. 1 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Public Law 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376 (2010). Due to the scope and complexity of the rulemaking, the FDIC has determined that an extension of the comment period until April 30, 2012, is appropriate. This action will allow interested persons additional time to analyze the proposed rules and to prepare their comments.

Dates

Comments on the proposed rule must be received on or before April 30, 2012.

Supplementary Information

On January 23, 2012, the proposed rule was published in the Federal Register . 3 The proposed rule implements section 165(i)(2) of the Dodd-Frank Act which requires the Corporation to issue regulations that require FDIC-insured state nonmember banks and FDIC-insured state-chartered savings associations with total consolidated assets of more than $10 billion (“covered banks”) to conduct annual stress tests (“bank-run stress tests”). The proposed rule defines the term “stress test” for purposes of the regulations; establishes methodologies for the conduct of the stress tests; establishes the form and content of a required report on the stress tests that banks must submit to the Corporation; and requires covered banks to publish a summary of the results of the required stress tests. 3 See id. In recognition of the complexities of the rulemaking and the variety of considerations involved in its impact and implementation, the FDIC requested that commenters respond to questions in the proposed rule. The proposed rule stated that the public comment period would close on March 23, 2012. 4 4 See id. The FDIC has received requests from the public for an extension of the comment period. The FDIC believes that it is important to allow parties more time to consider the impact of the proposed rule, and that such an extension will facilitate further public comment on the proposed rule. Therefore, the FDIC is extending the deadline for submitting comments on the proposed rule from March 23, 2012, to April 30, 2012. Dated at Washington, DC, this 16th day of March 2012. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2012-6799 Filed 3-20-12; 8:45 am]

Connections3 off-index
3 references not yet in our index
  • 12 CFR 325
  • Pub. L. 111-203
  • 124 Stat. 1376
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Proposed rule; extension of comment period
Cite12 CFR 325
Pub. L.Pub. L. 111-203
Stat.124 Stat. 1376
Cites 3Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.