Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2012-03-16 · Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Withdrawal of direct final rule

719 words·~3 min read·/register/2012/03/16/2012-6427·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Action: Withdrawal of direct final rule
Citation: FR Doc. 2012-6427 · RIN 2060-AR42 · EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0081; FRL-9648-9 · 40 CFR 52

Summary

The EPA issued “Revisions to Final Response to Petition From New Jersey Regarding SO 2 Emissions From the Portland Generating Station” as a direct final rule on December 22, 2011. Because the EPA received an adverse comment to the parallel proposal issued under the same name on December 22, 2011, we are withdrawing the direct final rule amendments to “Revisions to Final Response to Petition From New Jersey Regarding SO 2 Emissions From the Portland Generating Station” published in the Federal Register on December 22, 2011.

Dates

As of March 16, 2012, the EPA withdraws the direct final rule amendments published on December 22, 2011. See 76 FR 79541.

Supplementary Information

I. Background Information The EPA issued “Revisions to Final Response to Petition From New Jersey Regarding SO 2 Emissions From the Portland Generating Station” as a direct final rule on December 22, 2011. See 76 FR 79541. The direct final rule revised the preamble and rule text to the “Final Response to Petition From New Jersey Regarding SO 2 Emissions From the Portland Generating Station” (Portland) published November 7, 2011, to clarify that Portland significantly contributes to nonattainment or interferes with maintenance of the 1-hour sulfur dioxide national ambient air quality standard in the State of New Jersey, and not in specific counties within the state. See 76 FR 69052. The revisions did not change the conclusions that the EPA made in the final rule and did not affect the emission limits, increments of progress, compliance schedules, or reporting provisions. The EPA issued a parallel proposal under the same name on December 22, 2011, that proposed to make the same revisions outlined in the direct final and solicited comment on those revisions. See 76 FR 79574. We stated in the direct final rule amendments that if we received adverse comment to the parallel proposal by February 21, 2012, we would publish a timely notice of withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register. We received one adverse comment on the proposed amendments on February 21, 2012. We are consequently withdrawing the “Revisions to Final Response to Petition From New Jersey Regarding SO 2 Emissions From the Portland Generating Station” published as a direct final rule in the Federal Register on December 22, 2012 as of March 16, 2012. See 76 FR 79541. The EPA will address the adverse comment in a subsequent final action based on the parallel proposal also published on December 22, 2011. See 76 FR 79574. As stated in the parallel proposal, we will not institute a second comment period on this action. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Approval and promulgation of implementation plans, Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedures, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, and Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur dioxide. Dated: March 12, 2012. Lisa P. Jackson, Administrator. PART 52—[AMENDED] Accordingly, the amendments to the rule published in the Federal Register on December 22, 2011 (76 FR 79541) on pages 79541-79544 are withdrawn as of March 16, 2012. [FR Doc. 2012-6427 Filed 3-15-12; 8:45 am]

Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 40 CFR 52
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Withdrawal of direct final rule
Cite40 CFR 52
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.