Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2012-03-08 · Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Department of Labor · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Final rule; confirmation of effective date

654 words·~3 min read·/register/2012/03/08/2012-5589·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Department of Labor
Action: Final rule; confirmation of effective date
Citation: FR Doc. 2012-5589 · RIN 1218-AC64 · Docket No. OSHA-2011-0183 · 29 CFR 1910

Summary

OSHA is confirming the effective date of its direct final rule that revises the Acetylene Standard for general industry by updating the reference to a standard published by a standards-developing organization, the Compressed Gas Association. In the December 5, 2011, direct final rule, OSHA stated that it would withdraw the companion proposed rule and confirm the effective date of the direct final rule if the Agency received no significant adverse comments. OSHA did not receive significant adverse comments on the direct final rule. Therefore, OSHA is confirming that the direct final rule will become effective on March 5, 2012.

Dates

The direct final rule published on December 5, 2011 (76 FR 75782), is effective on March 5, 2012. For the purposes of judicial review, OSHA considers March 5, 2012, as the date of issuance.

Supplementary Information

On December 5, 2011, OSHA published a direct final rule (DFR) in the Federal Register that revised the Acetylene Standard for general industry by updating a reference to the Compressed Gas Association (GGA) acetylene standard ( see 76 FR 75782). In the DFR, OSHA deleted reference to CGA G-1-2003 and replaced it with CGA G-1-2009. In that Federal Register document, OSHA also stated that it would confirm the effective date of the DFR if the Agency received no significant adverse comments. OSHA received one comment on the DFR, which it determined was not a significant adverse comment. The commenter observed differences between provisions of the most recent Compressed Gas Association acetylene standard (CGA G-1-2009) and provisions of OSHA's oxygen-fuel gas welding and cutting standard at 29 CFR 1910.253. After describing the differences, the commenter stated that “the rulemaking process should include an assessment of how other existing OSHA Rules may be affected by the new or amended rule.” However, the commenter did not object to the revised provisions adopted by the CGA G-1-2009 standard that are the subject of this rulemaking. Therefore, the Agency determined that this comment was neither significant nor adverse. List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 1910 Acetylene, General industry, Occupational safety and health, Safety. Authority and Signature David Michaels, Ph.D., MPH, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210, authorized the preparation of this final rule. OSHA is issuing this final rule pursuant to Sections 4, 6, and 8 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 653, 655, and 657), 5 U.S.C. 553, Secretary of Labor's Order 1-2012 (77 FR 3912), and 29 CFR part 1911. Signed at Washington, DC on March 2, 2012. David Michaels, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health. [FR Doc. 2012-5589 Filed 3-7-12; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 4
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.