Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2012-02-02 · DEPARTMENT OF LABOR · Notices

Notices. Notice

722 words·~3 min read·/register/2012/02/02/2012-2268

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Office of the Secretary Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Shipyard Employment Standards ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Department of Labor
(DOL)is submitting the Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA)sponsored information collection request
(ICR)titled, “Shipyard Employment Standard” to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB)for review and approval for continued use in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA)of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.* ). DATES: Submit comments on or before March 5, 2012. ADDRESSES: A copy of this ICR with applicable supporting documentation; including a description of the likely respondents, proposed frequency of response, and estimated total burden may be obtained from the RegInfo.gov Web site, *http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain,* on the day following publication of this notice or by contacting Michel Smyth by telephone at
(202)693-4129 (this is not a toll-free number) or sending an email to *DOL_PRA_PUBLIC@dol.gov.* Submit comments about this request to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk Officer for the Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503, Telephone:
(202)395-6929/Fax:
(202)395-6881 (these are not toll-free numbers), email: *OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov.* FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michel Smyth by telephone at
(202)693-4129 (this is not a toll-free number) or by email at * DOL_PRA_PUBLIC@dol.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The information collection requirements of the Standard are directed towards reducing workers' risk of death or serious injury by ensuring that equipment has been tested and is in safe operating condition. The standard for shackles and hooks, 29 CFR 1915.113(b)(1), requires that all hooks for which no applicable manufacturer's recommendations are available be tested and that the employer retain a certification record. The standard on portable air receivers, 29 CFR 1915.172(d), requires that portable, unfired pressure vessels be examined quarterly and subjected to a yearly hydrostatic pressure test and that a certification record be maintained. This information collection is subject to the PRA. A Federal agency generally cannot conduct or sponsor a collection of information, and the public is generally not required to respond to an information collection, unless it is approved by the OMB under the PRA and displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. In addition, notwithstanding any other provisions of law, no person shall generally be subject to penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if the collection of information does not display a valid OMB Control Number. *See* 5 CFR 1320.5(a) and 1320.6. The DOL obtains OMB approval for this information collection under OMB Control Number 1218-0220. The current OMB approval is scheduled to expire on January 31, 2012; however, it should be noted that existing information collection requirements submitted to the OMB receive a month-to-month extension while they undergo review. For additional information, see the related notice published in the **Federal Register** on October 12, 2011 (76 FR 63327). Interested parties are encouraged to send comments to the OMB, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs at the address shown in the ADDRESSES section within 30 days of publication of this notice in the **Federal Register.** In order to help ensure appropriate consideration, comments should reference OMB Control Number 1218-0220. The OMB is particularly interested in comments that: • Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; • Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; • Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and • Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. *Agency:* Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). *Title of Collection:* Standard on Shipyard Employment (29 CFR part 1915). *OMB Control Number:* 1218-0220. *Affected Public:* Private Sector—Business or other for-profits. *Total Estimated Number of Respondents:* 635. *Total Estimated Number of Responses:* 13,051. *Total Estimated Annual Burden Hours:* 3,162. *Total Estimated Annual Other Costs Burden:* $0. Dated: January 26, 2012. Michel Smyth, Departmental Clearance Officer. [FR Doc. 2012-2268 Filed 2-1-12; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 3
2 references not yet in our index
  • 5 CFR 1320.5(a)
  • 29 CFR 1915
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Notice
Cite5 CFR 1320.5(a)
Cite29 CFR 1915
Cites 5Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.