Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2012-01-30 · Defense Acquisition Regulations System; Department of Defense (DoD) · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Final rule

850 words·~4 min read·/register/2012/01/30/2012-1487·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Defense Acquisition Regulations System; Department of Defense (DoD)
Action: Final rule
Citation: 77 FR (No. 19) · FR Doc. 2012-1487 · RIN 0750-AH50 · 48 CFR 225

Summary

DoD is issuing a final rule amending the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to incorporate adjusted thresholds for application of the World Trade Organization Government Procurement Agreement and the Free Trade Agreements, as determined by the United States Trade Representative. Additionally, this rule includes language in prescriptions for use of contract clauses intended to clarify their applicability to commercial items.

Dates

Effective Date: January 30, 2012.

Supplementary Information

I. Background Every two years, the trade agreements thresholds are adjusted according to a pre-determined formula set forth in the agreements. The United States Trade Representative has specified the following new thresholds in the Federal Register (76 FR 76808 December 8, 2011): Trade agreement Supply contract (equal to or exceeding) Construction contract (equal to or exceeding) WTO GPA $202,000 $7,777,000 FTAs: Australia FTA 77,494 7,777,000 Bahrain FTA 202,000 10,074,262 CAFTA-DR (Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua) 77,494 7,777,000 Chile FTA 77,494 7,777,000 Morocco FTA 202,000 7,777,000 NAFTA: —Canada 25,000 10,074,262 —Mexico 77,494 10,074,262 Peru FTA 202,000 7,777,000 Singapore FTA 77,494 7,777,000 II. Discussion and Analysis This final rule implements the new thresholds in the clause prescriptions at DFARS 225.1101 and 225.7503. III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804. IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act The Regulatory Flexibility Act does not apply to this rule because this final rule does not constitute a significant DFARS revision within the meaning of FAR 1.501-1 and 41 U.S.C. 1707 and does not require publication for public comment. V. Paperwork Reduction Act The rule does not contain any information collection requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35). List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 225 Government procurement. Ynette R. Shelkin, Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System. Therefore, 48 CFR part 225 is amended as follows: PART 225—FOREIGN ACQUISITION 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 225 is revised to read as follows: Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1. 2. In section 225.1101, revise paragraph (11)(i) to read as follows: 225.1101 Acquisition of supplies. (11)(i) Except as provided in paragraph (11)(ii) of this section, use the clause at 252.225-7036, Buy American Act—Free Trade Agreements—Balance of Payments Program, instead of the clause at FAR 52.225-3, Buy American Act—Free Trade Agreements—Israeli Trade Act, in solicitations and contracts for the items listed at 225.401-70, including acquisitions of commercial items or components, when the estimated value equals or exceeds $25,000, but is less than $202,000, and a Free Trade Agreement applies to the acquisition. (A) Use the basic clause when the estimated value equals or exceeds $77,494. (B) Use the clause with its Alternate I when the estimated value equals or exceeds $25,000 but is less than $77,494. 3. In section 225.7503, revise paragraphs (a)(1) and (b) to read as follows: 225.7503 Contract clauses. (a)(1) Use the clause at 252.225-7044, Balance of Payments Program—Construction Material, in solicitations and contracts for construction to be performed outside the United States, including acquisitions of commercial items or components, with a value greater than the simplified acquisition threshold but less than $7,777,000. (b)(1) Use the clause at 252.225-7045, Balance of Payments Program—Construction Material Under Trade Agreements, in solicitations and contracts for construction to be performed outside the United States with a value of $7,777,000 or more, including acquisitions of commercial items or components. (2) For acquisitions with a value of $7,777,000 or more, but less than $10,074,262, including acquisitions of comercial items or components, use the clause with its Alternate I, unless the acquisition is in support of Afghanistan. (3) If the acquisition is for construction with a value of $10,074,262 or more and is in support of operations in Afghanistan, use the clause with its Alternate II. (4) If the acquisition is for construction with a value of $7,777,000 or more, but less than $10,074,262, and is in support of operations in Afghanistan, use the clause with its Alternate III. [FR Doc. 2012-1487 Filed 1-27-12; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 3
2 references not yet in our index
  • 48 CFR 212
  • 48 CFR 225
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Final rule
Cite48 CFR 212
Cite48 CFR 225
Cites 5Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.