Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2011-11-23 · National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Final rule

466 words·~2 min read·/register/2011/11/23/2011-30148

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4165-15-P NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION 48 CFR Part 1809 RIN 2700-AD54 NASA Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Responsibility, Suspension and Debarment AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: NASA has adopted as final, without change, a proposed rule amending the NASA FAR Supplement
(NFS)to require contracting officers to notify prospective contractors if they are found to be nonresponsible. DATES: *Effective Date:* November 23, 2011. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leigh Pomponio, Procurement Analyst, at
(202)358-0592 or *leigh.pomponio@NASA.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background NASA published a proposed rule in the **Federal Register** at 76 FR 25656 on May 5, 2011, to implement a requirement for contracting officers to notify prospective contractors if they are found to be nonresponsible under FAR Subpart 9.1. Public comments were due on or before July 5, 2011. No comments were received. II. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804. III. Regulatory Flexibility Act NASA certifies that this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, *et seq.,* because it does not impose any new requirements on small entities. This rule only imposes requirements on Government personnel; the impact on the public, including small entities, is the receipt of additional information. IV. Paperwork Reduction Act This final rule does not contain any information collection requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35). List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 1809 Government procurement. Sheryl Goddard, Director, Program Operations Division. Accordingly, 48 CFR part 1809 is amended as follows: PART 1809—CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR Part 1809 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2455(a), 2473(c)(1). Subpart 1809.1—Responsible Prospective Contractors 2. Section 1809.105-2 is added to subpart 1809.1 to read follows: 1809.105-2 Determinations and documentation.
(a)The contracting officer shall provide written notification to a prospective contractor determined not responsible, which includes the basis for the determination. Notification provides the prospective contractor with the opportunity to take corrective action prior to future solicitations. [FR Doc. 2011-30148 Filed 11-22-11; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 3
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 48 CFR 1809
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Final rule
Cite48 CFR 1809
Cites 4Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.