Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2011-11-02 · Department of Defense (DOD), General Services Administration (GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Request for information

628 words·~3 min read·/register/2011/11/02/2011-27795·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Department of Defense (DOD), General Services Administration (GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
Action: Request for information
Citation: 76 FR (No. 212) · FR Doc. 2011-27795 · Notice 2011; Docket No. 2011-0091; Sequence 1

Summary

DoD, GSA, and NASA in consultation with the Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP) and the Office of Government Ethics (OGE), are seeking public comment on the question of whether additional guidance is necessary to address personal conflicts of interest by employees of Government contractors.

Dates

Interested parties should submit comments in writing to the Regulatory Secretariat at the address shown below on or before January 3, 2012.

Supplementary Information

DoD, GSA, and NASA, in close consultation with OFPP and OGE, have issued a final rule to address personal conflicts of interest by contractor employees performing acquisition functions closely associated with inherently governmental functions for, or on behalf of, a Federal agency or department. See FAR Case 2008-025, Preventing Personal Conflicts of Interest by Contractor Employees Performing Acquisition Functions, published concurrently with this notice. The rule implements provisions in section 841(a) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2009 (Pub. L. 110-417). Section 841(b) further requires that OFPP conduct a review of the Federal Acquisition Regulation to determine whether coverage of personal conflicts of interest should be expanded beyond contractors whose work supports acquisition functions closely associated with inherently governmental functions. DoD, GSA, and NASA, in consultation with OFPP and OGE, are working together to implement this requirement. As part of their review, they seek public comment on the issue of expanded coverage, taking into account the coverage provided by FAR Case 2008-025, and especially welcome public comment in response to the following questions: (1) Are there contracting methods, types, and services (other than those covered by FAR Case 2008-025) that raise heightened concerns for potential personal conflicts of interest? (2) Should regulatory coverage be expanded to address personal conflicts of interest by contractor employees with respect to functions other than those covered by FAR Case 2008-025? If so, what additional functions should be considered to ensure policies for the prevention and mitigation of personal conflicts of interest are sufficiently rigorous, comprehensive, and uniform? Responses to this notice will be taken into consideration by DoD, GSA, and NASA, in consultation with OFPP and OGE, as they evaluate the need for additional guidance on personal conflicts of interest. Dated: October 21, 2011. Laura Auletta, Acting Director, Office of Governmentwide Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition Policy, Office of Governmentwide Policy. [FR Doc. 2011-27795 Filed 11-1-11; 8:45 a.m.]

Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 110-417
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Request for information
Pub. L.Pub. L. 110-417
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.