Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2011-10-04 · U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, DHS · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Proposed rule; correction

257 words·~1 min read·/register/2011/10/04/2011-25463·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, DHS
Action: Proposed rule; correction
Citation: FR Doc. 2011-25463 · RIN 1615-AA90 · CIS No. 2484-09; Docket No. USCIS-2009-0029 · 8 CFR 216, 245

Summary

The Department of Homeland Security corrects an inadvertent error contained in the proposed rule titled Treatment of Aliens Whose Employment Creation Immigrant (EB-5) Petitions Were Approved After January 1, 1995 and Before August 31, 1998 published in the Federal Register on September 28, 2011. The docket number referenced in the proposed rule should read “DHS Docket No. USCIS-2009-0029”.

Dates

You must submit written comments on or before November 28, 2011.

Supplementary Information

Need for Correction On September 28, 2011, the Department of Homeland Security published a proposed rule in the Federal Register at 76 FR 59927 proposing to amend its regulations governing the employment creation (EB-5) immigrant classification. There was an inadvertent error in the document. The docket number referenced should be changed to read “DHS Docket No. USCIS-2009-0029” instead of “DHS Docket No. DHS-2009-0029”. Dated: September 28, 2011. Sunday Aigbe, Chief Regulatory Products Division, Office of the Executive Secretariat, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security. [FR Doc. 2011-25463 Filed 10-3-11; 8:45 am]

★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.