Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2011-09-13 · Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Civilian Personnel Policy) (DASD (CPP)), Department of Defense (DoD) · Notices

Notices. Notice; correction

459 words·~2 min read·/register/2011/09/13/2011-23336·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Office of the Secretary Science and Technology Reinvention Laboratory Demonstration Project; Department of the Army; Army Research, Development and Engineering Command; Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Center (TARDEC); Correction AGENCY: Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Civilian Personnel Policy) (DASD (CPP)), Department of Defense (DoD). ACTION: Notice; correction. SUMMARY: On March 7, 2011 (76 FR 12508-12548), DoD published notice of approval of a personnel management demonstration project for eligible TARDEC employees.
Within that notice the table showing the compensation regions defined by Normal Pay Ranges was misprinted. The Reduction-in-Force service credit was described erroneously, and several occupational series were omitted from the Occupational Families listed. This notice corrects these errors. DATES: Implementation of this demonstration project will begin no earlier than March 9, 2010. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: *TARDEC:* Mr. Gregory Berry, U. S. Army Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Center (TARDEC), 6501 East 11 Mile Road, *Attn:* RDTA-COS/MS 204, Warren, MI 48397-5000. *DoD:* Ms.
Betty Duffield, CPMS-PSSC, Suite B-200, 1400 Key Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22209-5144. Correction: 1. On page 12520, Table 7. Compensation Regions Defined by NPR is replaced with the table below: EN13SE11.010 2. On page 12529, **Section H. Reduction-in-Force
(RIF)Procedures** , the fourth paragraph is replaced with: The additional RIF service credit for performance shall be based on the last three OCS scores and will be applied as follows: a. 20 years of credit for each year the OCS is equal to or greater than the expected OCS. b. 16 years of credit for each year the OCS is less than the expected OCS but greater than 94% of the expected OCS. c. 12 years of credit for each year the OCS is less than 94% but greater than 90% of the expected OCS. d. Zero
(0)year of credit for each year the OCS is less than 90% of the expected OCS. Note 1: Expected OCS is the OCS that corresponds to the employee's base pay at the time of rating. 3. On page 12529, **Section H. Reduction-in-Force
(RIF)Procedures** , fifth paragraph, second to last sentence is changed to read: If an employee has not been rated under the demonstration project their rating will be considered acceptable and they will be given the full 20 years of performance credit. 4. On page 12537, **Appendix B: Occupational Series by Occupational Family** , the following series are added to the Occupational Families indicated: a. Engineering & Science: 0810 Civil Engineer Series. b. Business/Technical: 0399 Administration and Office Support Trainee Series. 1082 Writing and Editing. c. General Support: 0399 General Support Student Trainee Series. Dated: September 8, 2011. Aaron Siegel, Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. [FR Doc. 2011-23336 Filed 9-12-11; 8:45 am]
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.