Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2011-09-08 · Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Request for comments

759 words·~3 min read·/register/2011/09/08/2011-22943·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA
Action: Request for comments
Citation: 76 FR (No. 174) · FR Doc. 2011-22943 · Doc. No. AMS-PY-11-0064

Summary

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this document announces the Agricultural Marketing Service's (AMS) intention to request approval from the Office of Management and Budget, for an extension of and revision to a currently approved information collection in support of the shell egg surveillance portion of the Regulation for the Inspection of Eggs—7 CFR part 57.

Dates

Comments received by November 7, 2011 will be considered.

Supplementary Information

Title: Regulations for the Inspection of Eggs (Egg Products Inspection Act). OMB Number: 0581-0113. Expiration Date of Approval: March 31, 2012. Type of Request: Extension and revision of a currently approved information collection. Abstract: Congress enacted the Egg Products Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 1031-1056 (EPIA)) to provide, in part, a mandatory inspection program to control the disposition of dirty and checked shell eggs; to control unwholesome, adulterated, and inedible shell eggs that are unfit for human consumption; and to control the movement and disposition of imported shell eggs. The EPIA authorizes the Department to issue regulations, to assure that only eggs fit for human food are used for such purposes. Under the shell egg surveillance program, shell egg handlers are required to register with USDA. Quarterly, a State or Federal surveillance inspector visits each registered handler to verify that shell eggs packed for consumer use are in compliance, that restricted eggs are being disposed of properly, and that adequate records are being maintained. The information and recordkeeping requirements in this request are essential to carry out the intent of Congress, to administer the mandatory inspection program, and to take regulatory action, in accordance with the regulations and the EPIA. The forms within this collection package require the minimum information necessary to effectively carry out the requirements of the regulations, and their use is necessary to fulfill the intent of the EPIA. The information collected is used only by authorized representatives: AMS, Poultry Programs' national staff; regional directors and their staffs; Federal-State supervisors and their staffs; and resident Federal-State graders, which includes State agencies. The information is used to assure compliance with the EPIA and the regulations and to facilitate regulatory action. The Agency is the primary user of the information; secondary users include each authorized State agency that have a cooperative agreement with AMS. Estimate of Burden: Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 0.31 hours per response. Respondents: State or local governments, businesses or other for-profit, Federal agencies or employees, small businesses or organizations. Estimated Number of Respondents: 853. Estimated Number of Responses: 6,274. Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 7.35. Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 1936.58. Comments are invited on (a) whether the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of burden including the validity of the methodology and assumption used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques on other forms of information technology. Dated: September 2, 2011. David Shipman, Acting Administrator. [FR Doc. 2011-22943 Filed 9-7-11; 8:45 am]

Connections2 off-index
2 references not yet in our index
  • 7 CFR 57
  • 21 USC 1031-1056
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Request for comments
Cite7 CFR 57
Cite21 USC 1031-1056
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.