Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2011-07-14 · Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT · Notices

Notices. Notice to rescind a Notice of Intent and Draft Environmental Impact Statement

452 words·~2 min read·/register/2011/07/14/2011-17709

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 8025-01-M DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Highway Administration Notice To Rescind a Notice of Intent and Draft Environmental Impact Statement: Highway 35, Between Norfolk and South Sioux City, NE AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT. ACTION: Notice to rescind a Notice of Intent and Draft Environmental Impact Statement. SUMMARY: The FHWA is issuing this notice to advise the public that we are rescinding the Notice of Intent
(NOI)and Draft Environmental Impact Statement
(DEIS)for improvements that were proposed for the Highway 35 Corridor from Norfolk to South Sioux City
(N35)in Nebraska [DPS-35-4(119)]. The NOI was published in the **Federal Register** on March 4, 2002, and the DEIS availability was published in the **Federal Register** on January 11, 2008. This rescission is based on a lack of available funding for the full corridor proposal, which led to a reduction in scope to focus on the area of more defined need within the Norfolk area. The reduction in scope has brought the proposed action below the threshold of an EIS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melissa Maiefski, Program Delivery Team Lead, FHWA, Nebraska Division, 100 Centennial Mall North, Room 220, Lincoln, Nebraska 68508, *Telephone:*
(402)742-8473. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FHWA, in cooperation with the Nebraska Department of Roads (NDOR), is rescinding the NOI and DEIS for a proposal to improve N-35 between Norfolk and South Sioux City in Madison, Stanton, Wayne, Dixon, and Dakota Counties in Nebraska. The previous proposed action, described in the 2008 DEIS, was to upgrade the existing two lane, 70 mile rural highway to a four lane divided highway on partially new alignment. The NOI is being rescinded in large part due to funding constraints, which led to a reduction of scope to focus on the more imminent N-35 needs within the Norfolk area only. The current proposed actions would improve the capacity of N-35 within Norfolk, from the junction of N-35 with US 275 to Nucor Road, and would improve the intersection of N-35 with Norfolk Avenue and Victory Road. NDOR will be holding a public meeting to solicit community input on the new proposal, which will be advertised through the local media. Given the reduction in scope and the associated potential impacts of the proposed action, FHWA intends to prepare a lower-level NEPA document to determine if the project has the potential to significantly affect the quality of the human environment. If, at a future time, FHWA determines that the proposed action is likely to have a significant impact on the environment, a new NOI to prepare an EIS will be published. Authority: 23 U.S.C. 315; 49 CFR 1.48. Dated: July 8, 2011. Joseph A. Werning, Division Administrator, Nebraska. [FR Doc. 2011-17709 Filed 7-13-11; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 1
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 49 CFR 1.48
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Notice to rescind a Notice of Intent and Draft Environmental Impact Statement
Cite49 CFR 1.48
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.