Notices. Notice
925 words·~4 min read·
/register/2011/07/08/2011-17155A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration [Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0076] Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration
(FDA)is announcing that a proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB)for review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by August 8, 2011. ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, *Attn:* FDA Desk Officer, *Fax:* 202-395-7285, or e-mailed to *oira_submission@omb.eop.gov.* All comments should be identified with the OMB control number 0910-0303. Also include the FDA docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel Gittleson, Office of Information Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50-400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301-796-5156, *daniel.gittleson@fda.hhs.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for review and clearance. Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures—(OMB Control Number 0910-0303)—Revision FDA regulations in part 11 (21 CFR part 11) provide criteria for acceptance of electronic records, electronic signatures, and handwritten signatures executed to electronic records as equivalent to paper records. Under these regulations, records and reports may be submitted to FDA electronically provided the Agency has stated its ability to accept the records electronically in an Agency-established public docket and that the other requirements of part 11 are met. The recordkeeping provisions in part 11 (21 CFR part 11) (§§ 11.10, 11.30, 11.50, and 11.300) require the following standard operating procedures to assure appropriate use of, and precautions for, systems using electronic records and signatures:
(1)§ 11.10 specifies procedures and controls for persons who use closed systems to create, modify, maintain, or transmit electronic records;
(2)§ 11.30 specifies procedures and controls for persons who use open systems to create, modify, maintain, or transmit electronic records;
(3)§ 11.50 specifies procedures and controls for persons who use electronic signatures; and
(4)§ 11.300 specifies controls to ensure the security and integrity of electronic signatures based upon use of identification codes in combination with passwords. The reporting provision (§ 11.100) requires persons to certify in writing to FDA that they will regard electronic signatures used in their systems as the legally binding equivalent of traditional handwritten signatures. In the **Federal Register** of February 16, 2011 (76 FR 9024), FDA published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the proposed collection of information. FDA received one comment which was related to the Paperwork Reduction Act burden associated with this collection of information. The comment indicated that table 2 in the 60-day notice was not clear if it represented burden for all respondents, or just one respondent. In addition, the commenter noted that if table 2 represented the estimated burden for all respondents, that they did not agree with the accuracy of FDA's estimate, as the table appears to assume that each respondent creates one SOP per each 21 CFR section listed. The commenter felt that this assumption is not correct for large companies, who could possibly have several thousand systems, each requiring their own SOPs. If this were the case, the recordkeeping burden in Table 2 would be severely understated. FDA's response is to note that the recordkeeping burden in table 2 is an estimate of both large and small firms, and the burden represented in the table is an average of the burden for all forms. In addition, the recordkeeping requirements ask each respondent to this collection maintain a set of SOPs which could help the company and FDA in the future determine the methodology the company employed in its systems to ensure that the electronic signatures for its employees on documents submitted to the FDA were valid, if needed. Over the years, FDA developed this recordkeeping burden by listening to feedback from its staff and external stakeholders, and feels that the burden adequately represents the average burden a firm might expend to complete the recordkeeping requirements for this collection. The burden created by the information collection provision of this regulation is a one-time burden associated with the creation of standard operating procedures, validation, and certification. The Agency anticipates the use of electronic media will substantially reduce the paperwork burden associated with maintaining FDA required records. The respondents will be businesses and other for-profit organizations, State or local governments, Federal Agencies, and nonprofit institutions. FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as follows: Table 1—Estimated Annual Reporting Burden 1 21 CFR section Number of respondents Number of responses per respondent Total annual responses Average burden per response (in hours) Total hours 11,100 4,500 1 4,500 1 4,500 Total 4,500 1 There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information. Table 2—Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden 1 21 CFR section Number of recordkeepers Number of records per recordkeeper Total annual records Average burden per recordkeeping (in hours) Total hours 11.10 2,500 1 2,500 20 50,000 11.30 2,500 1 2,500 20 50,000 11.50 4,500 1 4,500 20 90,000 11.300 4,500 1 4,500 20 90,000 Total 280,000 1 There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information. Dated: July 5, 2011. Leslie Kux, Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy. [FR Doc. 2011-17155 Filed 7-7-11; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
1 reference not yet in our index
- 21 CFR 11
Citation graph
cites case law
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources