Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2011-06-21 · Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT · Notices

Notices. Notice and request for comments

422 words·~2 min read·/register/2011/06/21/2011-15383

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration Agency Information Collection Activities; Requests for Comments; Clearance of Renewed Approval of Information Collection; Advanced Qualification Program
(AQP)AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice and request for comments. SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB)approval to renew an information collection. The Advanced Qualification Program
(AQP)incorporates data driven quality control processes for validating and maintaining the effectiveness of air carrier training program curriculum content. DATES: Written comments should be submitted by August 22, 2011. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carla Scott on
(202)385-4293, or by e-mail at: *Carla.Scott@faa.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: *OMB Control Number:* 2120-0701. *Title:* Advanced Qualification Program (AQP). *Form Numbers:* There are no FAA forms associated with this collection. *Type of Review:* Renewal of an information collection. *Background:* Under SFAR No. 58, Advanced Qualification Program (AQP), the FAA provides certificated air carriers, as well as training centers they employ, with a regulatory alternative for training, checking, qualifying, and certifying aircrew personnel subject to the requirements of 14 CFR parts 121 and 135. AQP is continuously validated through the collection and analysis of trainee performance. Data collection and analysis processes ensure that the certificate holder provides performance information on its crewmembers, flight instructors, and evaluators that will enable the certificate holder and the FAA to determine whether the form and content of training and evaluation activities are satisfactorily accomplishing the overall objectives of the curriculum. *Respondents:* Approximately 18 certificated air carriers and training centers. *Frequency:* Information is collected monthly. *Estimated Average Burden per Response:* 1.20 hours. *Estimated Total Annual Burden:* 432 hours. ADDRESSES: Send comments to the FAA at the following address: Ms. Carla Scott, Room 336, Federal Aviation Administration, AES-300, 950 L'Enfant Plaza SW., Washington, DC 20024. *Public Comments Invited:* You are asked to comment on any aspect of this information collection, including
(a)Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance;
(b)the accuracy of the estimated burden;
(c)ways for FAA to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and
(d)ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information collection. Issued in Washington, DC on June 15, 2011. Carla Scott, FAA Information Collection Clearance Officer, IT Enterprises Business Services Division, AES-200. [FR Doc. 2011-15383 Filed 6-20-11; 8:45 am]
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.