Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2011-06-10 · Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Notice and withdrawal

489 words·~2 min read·/register/2011/06/10/2011-14484

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 3510-22-P 76 112 Friday, June 10, 2011 Notices DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Marketing Service [Document Number AMS-FV-09-0067; FV-09-330] United States Standards for Grades of Processed Raisins AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA. ACTION: Notice and withdrawal. SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS), of the United States Department of Agriculture
(USDA)is withdrawing a notice soliciting comments on its proposed revision to the United States Standards for Grades of Processed Raisins. Based on the petitioner's request to withdraw their petition, the agency has decided not to proceed with this action. DATES: *Effective Date:* June 10, 2011. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Myron Betts, Inspection and Standardization Section, Processed Products Branch (PPB), Fruit and Vegetable Programs (FV), AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 0709, South Building; STOP 0247, Washington, DC 20250; *Telephone:*
(202)720-5021 or fax
(202)690-1527; or e-mail: *Myron.Betts@ams.usda.gov.* The United States Standards for Grades of Processed Raisins are available by accessing the AMS Web site on the Internet at *http://www.ams.usda.gov/processedinspection.* Background On February 2, 2005, AMS received a petition from the Raisin Administrative Committee (RAC), requesting revision to the United States Standards for Grades of Processed Raisins. These standards are issued under the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1621-1627). The petitioner requested that AMS revise the United States Standards for Grades of Processed Raisins, Type I, Seedless Raisins. The revision would add a third sub-type, “Vine-dried (without the application of drying chemicals or materials)” and change the existing sub-type for “Dipped, Vine-dried or similarly processed raisins” to “Dipped, Vine-dried, treated with drying chemicals or materials”. On February 28, 2006, AMS published an advance notice of proposed rulemaking in the **Federal Register** (Vol. 71 39), [Docket No. FV-06-331] soliciting comments on the petition to revise the United States Standards for Grades of Processed Raisins. Between March 2007 and April 2010, AMS circulated a discussion draft to RAC which included a similar proposed revision to Type III, Raisins with Seeds. AMS did not receive any comments. On July 21, 2010, AMS asked the RAC if they would like to adopt the proposed changes or withdraw the petition. The RAC could not agree on the discussion draft language. In September 2010, AMS notified the RAC of its plan to withdraw the action to revise the United States Standards for Grades of Processed Raisins. The RAC agreed to bring up the issue again during their October 5, 2010, meeting. In October 2010 the RAC informed AMS that they had interest in keeping the process on the proposed revision open. In March 2011, the RAC requested that the proposed change to the United States Standards for Grades of Processed Raisins be withdrawn. AMS has decided not to proceed further with the proposed revision to the United States Standards for Grades of Processed Raisins and it is hereby withdrawn. Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621-1627. Dated: June 7, 2011. Ellen King, Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service. [FR Doc. 2011-14484 Filed 6-9-11; 8:45 am]
Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 7 USC 1621-1627
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Notice and withdrawal
Cite7 USC 1621-1627
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.