Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2011-06-06 · Office of the General Counsel, DHS · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Notice of availability; request for comments

566 words·~3 min read·/register/2011/06/06/2011-13801·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Office of the General Counsel, DHS
Action: Notice of availability; request for comments
Citation: FR Doc. 2011-13801 · Docket No. DHS-2011-0015

Summary

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announces the availability of its Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Review of Existing Regulations (Preliminary Plan). Pursuant to Executive Order 13563, “Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,” which the President issued on January 18, 2011, DHS developed its Preliminary Plan to facilitate the review of existing DHS regulations through the use of retrospective review. DHS is seeking public comment on its Preliminary Plan.

Dates

Written comments are requested on or before June 25, 2011. Late-filed comments will be considered to the extent practicable.

Supplementary Information

I. Public Participation Interested persons are invited to comment on this notice by submitting written data, views, or arguments using the method identified in the ADDRESSES section. Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and docket number for this notice. All comments received will be posted without change to . Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to . II. Background On January 18, 2011, the President issued Executive Order 13563, “Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,” to ensure that Federal regulations seek more affordable, less intrusive means to achieve policy goals and that agencies give careful consideration to the benefits and costs of those regulations. 76 FR 3821. The Executive Order requires each Executive Branch agency to develop a preliminary plan to periodically review its existing regulations to determine whether any regulations should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed so as to make the agency's regulatory program more effective or less burdensome in achieving its regulatory objectives. DHS's approach to conducting retrospective review focuses on public openness and transparency and on the critical role of public input in conducting retrospective review. To that end, DHS published a notice and request for comments in the Federal Register on March 14, 2011, “Reducing Regulatory Burden; Retrospective Review Under Executive Order 13563.” 76 FR 13526. In that notice, DHS solicited public input on how DHS should structure its retrospective review and which DHS rules would benefit from retrospective review. In addition, DHS launched an IdeaScale Web page; this social media tool provided an additional means for DHS to solicit input from the public, and more importantly, to foster dialogue among members of the public. DHS has incorporated the public input in developing its Preliminary Plan. The Preliminary Plan establishes a process for identifying regulations that may be obsolete, unnecessary, unjustified, excessively burdensome, or counterproductive. The DHS retrospective review process will help identify rules that warrant repeal or modification, or strengthening, complementing, or modernizing, where necessary or appropriate. The DHS Preliminary Plan is available for viewing online at and . We welcome public comment on its content. Ivan K. Fong, General Counsel. [FR Doc. 2011-13801 Filed 6-3-11; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Notice of availability; request for comments
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.