Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2011-06-02 · Federal Aviation Administration, DOT · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Final rule; technical amendment

434 words·~2 min read·/register/2011/06/02/2011-13675

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 91 [Docket No. FAA-2001-10047; Amdt. No. 91-322] RIN 2120-AH06 Regulation of Fractional Aircraft Ownership Programs and On-Demand Operations; Technical Amendment AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT. ACTION: Final rule; technical amendment. SUMMARY: The FAA is amending its regulations governing operations of aircraft in fractional ownership programs. This document corrects a technical error in the codified text of the regulations.
DATES: Effective June 2, 2011. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical questions concerning this action, contact Everette Rochon, General Aviation and Commercial Division, AFS-800, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone: 202-267-7413; e-mail: *everette.rochon@faa.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On September 17, 2003, the FAA published a final rule entitled, “Regulation of Fractional Aircraft Ownership Programs and On-Demand Operations” (68 FR 54520).
In that final rule the FAA updated and revised the regulations governing operations of aircraft in fractional ownership programs. Technical Amendment This technical amendment makes one revision to the final rule. The language in § 91.1091(f)(2) incorrectly uses the term “check pilot” when the term “flight instructor” should have been used. Accordingly, this amendment revises § 91.1091(f)(2). Because the section title applies to flight instructors it is obvious that the use of the term “check pilot” in (f)(2) should have been “flight instructor”.
This technical amendment corrects an incorrect term and we find good cause exists under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) to make the amendment effective in less than 30 days. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 91 Afghanistan, Agriculture, Air traffic control, Aircraft, Airmen, Airports, Aviation safety, Canada, Cuba, Ethiopia, Freight, Mexico, Noise control, Political candidates, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, and Yugoslavia. The Amendment In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration amends chapter I of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 91—GENERAL OPERATING AND FLIGHT RULES 1. The authority citation for part 91 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 1155, 40103, 40113, 40120, 44101, 44111, 44701, 44704, 44709, 44711, 44712, 44715, 44716, 44717, 44722, 46306, 46315, 46316, 46504, 46506-46507, 47122, 47508, 47528-47531, articles 12 and 29 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation (61 Stat. 1180). 2. Amend § 91.1091 by revising paragraph (f)(2) to read as follows: § 91.1091 Qualifications:
Flight instructors (aircraft) and flight instructors (simulator).
(f)* * *
(2)Satisfactorily complete an approved line-observation program within the period prescribed by that program preceding the performance of any flight instructor duty in a flight simulator. Issued in Washington, DC on May 26, 2011. Dennis R. Pratte, Acting Director, Office of Rulemaking. [FR Doc. 2011-13675 Filed 6-1-11; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 2
2 references not yet in our index
  • 14 CFR 91
  • 61 Stat. 1180
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Final rule; technical amendment
Cite14 CFR 91
Stat.61 Stat. 1180
Cites 4Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.