Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2011-05-24 · Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Withdrawal of Direct Final Rule

459 words·~2 min read·/register/2011/05/24/2011-12783·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Action: Withdrawal of Direct Final Rule
Citation: FR Doc. 2011-12783 · EPA-HQ-RCRA-2010-0851; FRL-9310-2 · 40 CFR 268

Summary

Because EPA received adverse comment, we are withdrawing the Direct Final rule that granted a site-specific treatment variance to U.S. Ecology Nevada in Beatty, Nevada and withdrew an existing site-specific treatment variance issued to Chemical Waste Management, Inc. in Kettleman Hills, California. The Direct Final rule pertains to the treatment of a hazardous waste generated by the Owens-Brockway Glass Container Company in Vernon, California that is unable to meet the concentration-based treatment standard for selenium established under the Land Disposal Restrictions program. EPA also issued a parallel proposal to be used as the basis for the final action in the event that EPA received any adverse comments on the Direct Final rule.

Dates

Effective May 24, 2011, EPA withdraws the Direct Final rule published at 76 FR 18921 on April 6, 2011.

Supplementary Information

Because EPA received adverse comment, we are withdrawing the Direct Final rule that amended the Land Disposal Restrictions treatment standards (40 CFR part 268.44(o)) by granting a site-specific treatment variance to U.S. Ecology Nevada in Beatty, Nevada and withdrawing an existing site-specific treatment variance issued to Chemical Waste Management, Inc. in Kettleman Hills, California, published on April 6, 2011 at 76 FR 18921. We stated in that Direct Final rule that if we received adverse comment by May 6, 2011, the Direct Final rule would not take effect and we would publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register . We subsequently received adverse comment on that Direct Final rule. We will address those comments in any subsequent final action, which will be based on the parallel proposed rule also published on April 6, 2011 at 76 FR 18921. As stated in the Direct Final rule and the parallel proposed rule, we will not institute a second comment period on this action. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 268 Environmental protection, Hazardous waste, and Variances. Dated: May 17, 2011. Mathy Stanislaus, Assistant Administrator, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Accordingly, the amendments to the rule published on April 6, 2011 (76 FR 18921) are withdrawn as of May 24, 2011. [FR Doc. 2011-12783 Filed 5-23-11; 8:45 am]

Connections2 off-index
2 references not yet in our index
  • 40 CFR 268
  • 40 CFR 268.44(o)
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Withdrawal of Direct Final Rule
Cite40 CFR 268
Cite40 CFR 268.44(o)
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.