Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2011-05-16 · Nuclear Regulatory Commission · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Petition for rulemaking; consideration in the rulemaking process

479 words·~2 min read·/register/2011/05/16/2011-11955·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Action: Petition for rulemaking; consideration in the rulemaking process
Citation: FR Doc. 2011-11955 · Docket No. PRM-26-5; NRC-2010-0304 · 10 CFR 26

Summary

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has decided to consider the issues raised in a petition for rulemaking (PRM) submitted by Anthony R. Pietrangelo, on behalf of the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI), the petitioner, in the planned “Quality Control/Quality Verification” (QC/QV) rulemaking (Docket ID: NRC-2009-0090). The petitioner requested that the NRC amend its regulations regarding its fitness-for-duty programs to refine existing requirements based on experience gained since the regulations were last amended in 2008.

Supplementary Information

On October 22, 2010, (75 FR 65249), the NRC published a Notice of Receipt of a PRM filed by Anthony R. Pietrangelo, on behalf of NEI, and request for public comment. The comment period closed on January 5, 2011. The NRC received 49 public comments. The NRC determined that the issues raised in PRM-26-5 are appropriate for consideration and will consider them in the planned QC/QV rulemaking. The NRC staff will address the comments filed in PRM-26-5 as part of the QC/QV rulemaking. This PRM docket is closed. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 30th day of April 2011. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Martin J. Virgilio, Deputy Executive Director for Reactor and Preparedness Programs. [FR Doc. 2011-11955 Filed 5-13-11; 8:45 am]

Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 10 CFR 26
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Petition for rulemaking; consideration in the rulemaking process
Cite10 CFR 26
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.