Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2011-05-06 · Food and Drug Administration, HHS · Notices

Notices. Notice

728 words·~3 min read·/register/2011/05/06/2011-11102

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4160-01-P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration [Docket No. FDA-2009-D-0126] Guidance for Industry on the Submission of Summary Bioequivalence Data for Abbreviated New Drug Applications; Availability AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration
(FDA)is announcing the availability of a guidance for industry entitled “Submission of Summary Bioequivalence Data for Abbreviated New Drug Applications.” The guidance is intended to assist abbreviated new drug application
(ANDA)applicants in complying with the requirements in the final rule on the submission of bioequivalence data that published in the **Federal Register** in January 2009 (74 FR 2849, January 16, 2009). The final rule requires ANDA applicants to submit data from all bioequivalence studies (BE studies) the applicant conducts on a drug product formulation submitted for approval, including both studies that demonstrate and studies that fail to demonstrate that a generic product meets the current bioequivalence criteria. The guidance provides recommendations to applicants planning to include BE studies for submission in ANDAs and is applicable to BE studies conducted during both preapproval and postapproval periods. DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on Agency guidances at any time. ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for single copies of this guidance to the Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 2201, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002. Send one self-addressed adhesive label to assist that office in processing your requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic access to the guidance document. Submit electronic comments on the guidance to *http://www.regulations.gov.* Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aida L. Sanchez, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (HFD-650), Food and Drug Administration, 7520 Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855, 240-276-8782. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background FDA is announcing the availability of a guidance for industry entitled “Submission of Summary Bioequivalence Data for ANDAs.” The guidance provides recommendations to applicants planning to include BE studies for submission in ANDAs. The guidance provides information on the following subjects: • Types of ANDA submissions covered by the regulations on BE studies; • Recommended format for summary reports of BE studies; and • Types of formulations the Agency considers to be the same drug product formulation for different dosage forms based on differences in composition. The guidance is applicable to BE studies conducted for ANDAs during both preapproval and postapproval periods. On April 17, 2009, FDA announced the availability of the draft version of this guidance (74 FR 17872). The public comment period closed on July 16, 2009. A few comments were received from the public, all of which the Agency considered carefully as it finalized the guidance and made appropriate changes. Changes to the guidance were minor and made to clarify statements in the draft guidance. This guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The guidance represents the Agency's current thinking on submission of summary bioequivalence data for ANDAs. It does not create or confer any rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the public. An alternative approach may be used if such approach satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations. II. Comments Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES ) either electronic or written comments regarding this document. It is only necessary to send one set of comments. It is no longer necessary to send two copies of mailed comments. Identify comments with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. III. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 This guidance refers to information collection provisions that are subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB)under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The collections of information in 21 CFR 314.94(a)(7), 314.96(a)(1), and 314.97 have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0630. IV. Electronic Access Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the document at either *http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm* or *http://www.regulations.gov.* Dated: May 2, 2011. Leslie Kux, Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy. [FR Doc. 2011-11102 Filed 5-5-11; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 2
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 44 USC 3501-3520
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Notice
Cite44 USC 3501-3520
Cites 3Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.