Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2011-04-15 · Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) and request for comment

1,286 words·~6 min read·/register/2011/04/15/2011-9210·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)
Action: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) and request for comment
Citation: FR Doc. 2011-9210 · RIN 3064-AD78 · 12 CFR 329, 330

Summary

Effective July 21, 2011, the statutory prohibition against the payment of interest on demand deposits will be repealed pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the DFA). 1 In light of this, the FDIC proposes to rescind regulations that have implemented this prohibition with respect to state-chartered nonmember (SNM) banks. Because the regulations include a definition of “interest” that may assist the FDIC in interpreting a recent statutory amendment that provides temporary, unlimited deposit insurance coverage for noninterest-bearing transaction accounts, the FDIC also proposes to retain and move the definition of “interest” into the deposit insurance regulations. 1 Public Law 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376.

Dates

Comments must be received on or before May 16, 2011.

Supplementary Information

I. Background Section 343 of the DFA amended section 11(a)(1) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, 12 U.S.C. 1821(a)(1), to provide full insurance coverage for depository institution noninterest-bearing transaction accounts from December 31, 2010, through December 31, 2012. Section 627 of the DFA repealed the statutory prohibition against the payment of interest on demand deposits, effective one year from the date of the DFA's enactment, July 21, 2011. In light of the prospective repeal of the demand deposit interest prohibition, the FDIC proposes to rescind 12 CFR Part 329, the regulation which implements that prohibition with respect to SNM banks, to be effective on the same date as the statutory repeal, July 21, 2011. At the same time, however, a regulatory definition of the term “interest” will still be useful in interpreting the requirements of section 343 of the DFA providing temporary, unlimited deposit insurance coverage for noninterest-bearing transaction accounts. For this reason, the FDIC proposes, as part of this same rulemaking, to transfer the definition of “interest” currently found at 12 CFR 329.1(c) to Part 330, specifically the definitions section at 12 CFR 330.1. The FDIC also specifically solicits comment on whether other parts of Part 329 could also prove useful and therefore should be moved into Part 330 as well. For example, section 329.103 provides an interpretive rule that defines what constitutes a “premium” which may prove useful in determining whether an account qualifies as a noninterest-bearing transaction account. The FDIC seeks comment on every aspect of this proposed rule. II. Regulatory Analysis and Procedure A. Solicitation of Comments on Use of Plain Language Section 722 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, 1471 (Nov. 12, 1999), requires the Federal banking agencies to use plain language in all proposed and final rules published after January 1, 2000. We invite your comments on how to make this proposal easier to understand. For example: • Have we organized the material to suit your needs? If not, how could this material be better organized? • Are the requirements in the proposed regulation clearly stated? If not, how could the regulation be more clearly stated? • Does the proposed regulation contain language or jargon that is not clear? If so, which language requires clarification? • Would a different format (grouping and order of sections, use of headings, paragraphing) make the regulation easier to understand? If so, what changes to the format would make the regulation easier to understand? • What else could we do to make the regulation easier to understand? B. Regulatory Flexibility Act The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) requires that each federal agency either certify that a proposed rule would not, if adopted in final form, have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities or prepare an initial regulatory flexibility analysis of the rule and publish the analysis for comment. For purposes of the RFA analysis or certification, financial institutions with total assets of $175 million or less are considered to be “small entities.” The FDIC hereby certifies pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that the NPR, if adopted, will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This is because the FDIC already applies the Part 329 definition of “interest” for purposes of determining whether an account qualifies for full deposit insurance coverage as a noninterest-bearing transaction account. The FDIC is only proposing to transfer the definition from Part 329 to Part 330 because the former regulation will become moot on July 21, 2011, pursuant to section 627 of the DFA and its repeal of the statutory ban on the payment of interest on demand deposits. There will therefore be no significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities as a result of this change. C. Paperwork Reduction Act No collections of information pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 3501 et seq. ) are contained in the proposed rule. D. The Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 1999—Assessment of Federal Regulations and Policies on Families The FDIC has determined that the proposed rule will not affect family well-being within the meaning of section 654 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, enacted as part of the Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1999 (). List of Subjects 12 CFR Part 329 Banks, banking, interest rates. 12 CFR Part 330 Bank deposit insurance, Banks, Banking, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Savings and loan associations, Trusts and trustees. For the reasons set forth in the preamble, and under the authority of 12 U.S.C. 1813, the FDIC proposes to amend chapter III of title 12 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows: PART 329—[REMOVED] 1. Part 329 is removed and reserved. PART 330—DEPOSIT INSURANCE COVERAGE 2. The authority for part 330 continues to read as follows: 12 U.S.C. 1813( l ), 1813(m), 1817(i), 1818(q), 1819(Tenth), 1820(f), 1821(a), 1822(c). 3. In § 330.1, paragraphs (k) through (r) are redesignated as paragraphs (l) through (s), respectively, and new paragraph (k) is added to read as follows: § 330.1 Definitions. (k) Interest, with respect to a deposit, means any payment to or for the account of any depositor as compensation for the use of funds constituting a deposit. A bank's absorption of expenses incident to providing a normal banking function or its forbearance from charging a fee in connection with such a service is not considered a payment of interest. By order of the Board of Directors. Dated at Washington, DC, this 12th day of April 2011. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2011-9210 Filed 4-14-11; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 5
4 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 111-203
  • 124 Stat. 1376
  • 12 CFR 329
  • 12 CFR 330
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) and request for comment
Pub. L.Pub. L. 111-203
Stat.124 Stat. 1376
Cite12 CFR 329
Cite12 CFR 330
Cites 9Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.