Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2011-04-11 · Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of Energy · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Decision and order; correction SUMMARY: On March 31, 2011, the U

824 words·~4 min read·/register/2011/04/11/2011-8572·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of Energy
Action: Decision and order; correction
Citation: FR Doc. 2011-8572 · RIN 1904-AB89 · Docket Number EERE-2008-BT-TP-0020 · 10 CFR 430

Summary

On March 31, 2011, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published a Decision and Order in the Federal Register which granted 27 companies submitting petitions before the required date ( i.e., by February 17, 2011), a 180-day extension of the compliance date for recent amendments to the DOE test procedure for residential furnaces and boilers related to the standby mode and off mode energy consumption of these products. Recently, DOE received a petition dated February 17, 2011 from a 28th manufacturer, Viessmann Manufacturing Company, Inc., in which the manufacturer also requested the above-referenced 180-day extension. Although DOE received this petition well after February 17, 2011, the Department believes a number of factors, including international postal handling and Federal mail security screening, contributed to the delay in receipt of this petition. After review, DOE has decided to grant the petition. However, DOE was not able to include its determination regarding this petition in its March 31, 2011 Decision and Order, because publication was already underway. Through this correction notice, DOE is modifying its Decision and Order to add Viessmann Manufacturing Company, Inc., to the list of companies to whom the extension of the compliance date has been granted.

Dates

This correction to the above-referenced Decision and Order is effective April 11, 2011. For representation purposes, petitioners must comply with all applicable provisions of the amended DOE test procedure for residential furnaces and boilers starting on October 15, 2011.

Supplementary Information

I. Background On March 31, 2011, DOE published a notice in the Federal Register (76 FR 17755) which announced receipt of petitions requesting a 180-day extension of the April 18, 2011 compliance date for representations associated with amendments to the DOE test procedure for residential furnaces and boilers in the October 20, 2010 final rule (75 FR 64621) from the following 27 companies: (1) Adams Manufacturing Company; (2) Allied Air Enterprises; (3) Bard Manufacturing Co. Inc.; (4) Boyertown Furnace; (5) Carrier Corporation; (6) Crown Boiler; (7) De Dietrich Boilers; (8) ECR International Inc.; (9) Goodman Manufacturing Company; (10) HTP Inc.; (11) Johnson Controls Inc.; (12) Laars Heating Systems Company; (13) Lennox International Inc.; (14) Lochinvar; (15) Newmac Furnace Company; (16) New Yorker Residential Heating Boilers; (17) Nordyne; (18) NY Thermal Inc.; (19) Peerless Boilers Heat LLC; (20) Raypak Inc.; (21) Rheem Manufacturing Company; (22) Slant/Fin; (23) Thermo Products LLC; (24) Trane; (25) Triangle Tube; (26) US Boiler Company; and (27) Weil-McLain. In the same March 31, 2011 Federal Register notice, DOE published a Decision and Order which granted to the above 27 petitioners the requested 180-day extension of the compliance date for recent amendments to the DOE test procedure for residential furnaces and boilers related to the standby mode and off mode energy consumption of these products. Recently, DOE received a petition dated February 17, 2011 from a 28th manufacturer, Viessmann Manufacturing Company, Inc., in which the manufacturer also requested the above-referenced 180-day extension. Viessmann Manufacturing Company's petition recited many of the same arguments as the earlier petitioners regarding the undue hardship which the petitioner would face if the requested extension of the compliance date were not granted. DOE has determined that the petitioner has made its case and that the extension should be granted for the reasons stated in the March 31, 2011 Decision and Order. II. Conclusion Although DOE received this petition well after February 17, 2011, the Department believes a number of factors, including international postal handling and Federal mail security screening, contributed to this delay in receipt of the petition from this 28th manufacturer. After review, DOE has decided to grant the petition. Through this correction notice, DOE is modifying its Decision and Order to add Viessmann Manufacturing Company, Inc., to the list of companies to whom the extension of the compliance date has been granted. Issued in Washington, DC, on April 5, 2011. Kathleen Hogan, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency, Office of Technology Development, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. [FR Doc. 2011-8572 Filed 4-8-11; 8:45 am]

Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 10 CFR 430
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Decision and order; correction SUMMARY: On March 31, 2011, the U
Cite10 CFR 430
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.