Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2011-03-10 · Department of State · Notices

Notices. 30-Day notice of submission of information collection approval from the Office of Management and Budget and request for comments

683 words·~3 min read·/register/2011/03/10/2011-5372

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P DEPARTMENT OF STATE [Public Notice 7361] Office of Directives Management (A/GIS/DIR); Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Generic Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery AGENCY: Department of State. ACTION: 30-Day notice of submission of information collection approval from the Office of Management and Budget and request for comments. SUMMARY: As part of a Federal Government-wide effort to streamline the process to seek feedback from the public on service delivery, The Department of State has submitted a Generic Information Collection Request (Generic ICR):
“Generic Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery ” to OMB for approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA)(44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.* ). DATES: Submit comments to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB)for up to 30 days from March 10, 2011. ADDRESSES: Direct comments to the Department of State Desk Officer in the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs at the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). You may submit comments by the following methods: • *E-mail: oira_submission@omb.eop.gov.* You must include the DS form number, information collection title, and OMB control number in the subject line of your message. • *Fax:* 202-395-5806. *Attention:* Desk Officer for Department of State. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request additional information, please contact: Raymond Ciupek, Department of State, Office of Directives Management, 1800 G St., NW., Suite 2400, Washington, DC 20522-2202, who may be reached at *ciupekra@state.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: *Title:* Generic Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery. *Abstract:* The information collection activity will garner qualitative customer and stakeholder feedback in an efficient, timely manner, in accordance with the Administration's commitment to improving service delivery. By qualitative feedback we mean information that provides useful insights on perceptions and opinions, but are not statistical surveys that yield quantitative results that can be generalized to the population of study. This feedback will provide insights into customer or stakeholder perceptions, experiences and expectations, provide an early warning of issues with service, or focus attention on areas where communication, training or changes in operations might improve delivery of products or services. These collections will allow for ongoing, collaborative and actionable communications between the Agency and its customers and stakeholders. It will also allow feedback to contribute directly to the improvement of program management. Feedback collected under this generic clearance will provide useful information, but it will not yield data that can be generalized to the overall population. This type of generic clearance for qualitative information will not be used for quantitative information collections that are designed to yield reliably actionable results, such as monitoring trends over time or documenting program performance. Such data uses require more rigorous designs that address: the target population to which generalizations will be made, the sampling frame, the sample design (including stratification and clustering), the precision requirements or power calculations that justify the proposed sample size, the expected response rate, methods for assessing potential non-response bias, the protocols for data collection, and any testing procedures that were or will be undertaken prior fielding the study. Depending on the degree of influence the results are likely to have, such collections may still be eligible for submission for other generic mechanisms that are designed to yield quantitative results. Below we provide the Department of State projected average estimates for the next three years: *Current Actions:* New collection of information. *Type of Review:* New Collection. *Affected Public:* Individuals and Households, Businesses and Organizations, State, Local or Tribal Government. *Average Expected Annual Number of activities:* 50. *Respondents:* Individuals responding to Department of State customer services evaluation requests. *Average Number of Respondents per Activity:* 500. *Annual responses:* 25,000. *Frequency of Response:* Once per request. *Average minutes per response:* 15 minutes. *Burden hours:* 6,250. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget control number. Dated: March 3, 2011. T.J. Furlong, Director, Office of Directives Management, Department of State. [FR Doc. 2011-5372 Filed 3-9-11; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
30-Day notice of submission of information collection approval from the Office of Management and Budget and request for comments
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.