Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2011-02-25 · Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Review and request for comments

645 words·~3 min read·/register/2011/02/25/2011-4257·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA
Action: Review and request for comments
Citation: FR Doc. 2011-4257 · Document Number AMS-NOP-11-0005; NOP-11-01 · 7 CFR 205

Summary

This document announces the Agricultural Marketing Service's (AMS) plans to review the National Organic Program (NOP) regulations (7 CFR part 205). This review will be conducted under criteria contained in section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), as amended. The RFA provisions require that all Federal agencies review existing regulations that have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities to determine whether the associated impact can be minimized.

Dates

Written comments must be received by April 26, 2011.

Supplementary Information

The NOP is authorized by the Organic Foods Production Act (OFPA) of 1990, as amended (7 U.S.C. 6501-6522). The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) administers the NOP. Under the NOP, the AMS oversees national standards for the production, handling, and labeling of organically produced agricultural products. Final regulations implementing the National Organic Program (NOP) were published December 21, 2000 (65 FR 80548), and became effective on October 21, 2002. On March 24, 2006, AMS published in the Federal Register (71 FR 14827), its schedule to review certain regulations, including the NOP regulations, under criteria contained in section 610 of the RFA (5 U.S.C. 601-612). Because many AMS regulations impact small entities, AMS decided, as a matter of policy, to periodically review regulations, irrespective of whether specific regulations meet the threshold requirement for mandatory review established by the RFA. As a result, the Agency is now conducting this review of the NOP regulations. The purpose of the review is to determine whether the NOP regulations should be continued without change, amended, or rescinded, consistent with the objectives of applicable statutes, to minimize the impacts on small entities. In conducting this review, the AMS will consider the following factors: (1) The continued need for the regulations; (2) the nature of complaints or comments received from the public concerning the regulations; (3) the complexity of the regulations; (4) the extent to which the regulations overlap, duplicate, or conflict with other Federal rules, and, to the extent feasible, with State and local regulations; and (5) the length of time since the regulations have been evaluated or the degree to which technology, economic conditions, or other factors have changed in the area affected by the regulations. Written comments, views, opinions, and other information regarding the impact of the NOP regulations on small businesses are invited. Dated: February 22, 2011. Rayne Pegg, Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service. [FR Doc. 2011-4257 Filed 2-24-11; 8:45 am]

Connections3 off-index
3 references not yet in our index
  • 7 CFR 205
  • 7 USC 6501-6522
  • 5 USC 601-612
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Review and request for comments
Cite7 CFR 205
Cite7 USC 6501-6522
Cite5 USC 601-612
Cites 3Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.