Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2011-02-07 · National Archives and Records Administration · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Direct final rule

886 words·~4 min read·/register/2011/02/07/2011-2033·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: National Archives and Records Administration
Action: Direct final rule
Citation: FR Doc. 2011-2033 · RIN 3095-AB69 · NARA-10-0005 · 36 CFR 1254

Summary

The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) is changing the appeal authority for researchers whose privileges have been revoked for specific behaviors, from the Archivist of the United States to the Deputy Archivist of the United States. This change will align the appeal authority for researchers whose research privileges have been revoked with the appeal authority for individuals who have been banned from NARA facilities for prohibited activities. Researchers maintain the same rights of appeal.

Dates

This rule is effective March 9, 2011 without further action, unless adverse comment is received by March 9, 2011. If adverse comment is received, NARA will publish a timely withdrawal of the rule in the Federal Register , and publish a notice of proposed rulemaking.

Supplementary Information

NARA is authorized to revoke researchers' privileges under certain circumstances by following the procedures outlined in 36 CFR part 1254. The privileges may be revoked for the following behaviors: Refusing to follow the rules and regulations of a NARA facility; acting or speaking in a way that may be dangerous to documents held by NARA or NARA property; acting or speaking in a way that may be dangerous to other researchers, NARA or contractor employees, or volunteers; or verbally or physically harassing or annoying other researchers, NARA or contractor employees, or volunteers. This change will align the appeal authority for researchers whose research privileges have been revoked with the appeal authority for individuals who have been banned from NARA facilities for the following prohibited activities on NARA properties: Carrying or using guns or weapons, using or in possession of alcohol or illegal drugs; gambling; soliciting; stealing NARA property; willfully damaging or destroying NARA property; creating any hazard to persons or things; throwing anything from or at a NARA building; improperly disposing of rubbish; acting in a disorderly fashion; acting in a manner that creates a loud or unusual noise or a nuisance; acting in a manner that unreasonably obstructs the usual use of NARA facilities; acting in a manner that otherwise impedes or disrupts the performance of official duties by Government and contract employees; acting in a manner that prevents the general public from obtaining NARA-provided services in a timely manner; loitering; or threatening directly ( e.g., in-person communications or physical gestures) or indirectly ( e.g., via regular mail, electronic mail, or phone) any NARA employee, visitor, volunteer, contractor, other building occupants, or property, which is the Deputy Archivist of the United States. Researchers maintain the same rights of appeal. Revocation actions are taken by staff at the NARA facility where an infraction takes place. In turn, researchers have the right to appeal the revocation to a higher authority than the local NARA facility director; a process which is also described in 36 CFR part 1254. The current appeal authority is the Archivist of the United States, yet the appeal authority for the more severe penalty of banning individuals from NARA facilities under 36 CFR part 1280, is the Deputy Archivist of the United States. This direct final rule will only change the appeal authority for researchers whose privileges have been revoked, from the Archivist of the United States to the Deputy Archivist of the United States, aligning the two disciplinary appeal processes. Researchers retain their full right to appeal revocation decisions. NARA believes that a Notice of Proposed Rule Making is not necessary for “good cause” as permitted by the Administrative Procedures Act (5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B)) as this rule is a nomenclature change only, and there are no changes to the public's right to appeal revocation decisions. This direct final rule is not a significant regulatory action for the purposes of Executive Order 12866. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act, it is hereby certified that this direct final rule will not have a significant impact on small entities. List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 1254 Archives and records. For the reasons set forth in the preamble, NARA amends part 1254 of title 36, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows: PART 1254—USING RECORDS AND DONATED HISTORICAL MATERIALS 1. The authority citation for part 1254 continues to read as follows: Authority: 44 U.S.C. 2101-2118. § 1254.50 [Amended] 2. In § 1254.50, remove the word “Archivist” and add, in its place, the words “Deputy Archivist” wherever it appears in the section. § 1254.52 [Amended] 3. In § 1254.52, remove the word “Archivist” and add, in its place, the words “Deputy Archivist” wherever it appears in the section. Dated: January 25, 2011. David S. Ferriero, Archivist of the United States. [FR Doc. 2011-2033 Filed 2-4-11; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 2
Traces to 2 documents
3 references not yet in our index
  • 36 CFR 1254
  • 36 CFR 1280
  • 44 USC 2101-2118
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Direct final rule
Cite36 CFR 1254
Cite36 CFR 1280
Cite44 USC 2101-2118
Cites 5Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.